If this feminized brain structure were "superior", in history and recent time why aren't there female or homosexual male scientists, scholars and warriors all across the board?
One can make note of many geniuses that never begat children or ‘bothered’ with family life, and the many great artists who were or have been reputed to have been homosexual or bisexual such as: Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Caravaggio, Jean-Baptiste Lully, Beethoven, Chopin, Lord Byron, Oscar Wilde, Marcel Proust and so on.
I'm not picking sides, just pointing out that he already answered your question. I'm interested to see how his statement will be rebunked. Mind you that since homosexuality has been heavily tabooed in the western world for 2000 years (because of christianity) there might be tons of historically important closet fags out there. But hey this should help: maybe it was because of the pressure they were under because of possible persecution that they tried to make themselves valuable in other ways. Maybe if homosexuality was encouraged then they would have all ended as some drunken sailors lovebird instead of geniuses. We'll never know any of these things for sure will we?
So here's another way of looking at it: what has homosexuality done for mankind? Not homos, but homosexuality itself...?
I was speaking in general terms here, but a good lot of those names in that list are male artists
, and my previous statement was not made in ignorance of that list.
It's possible that the successes of most of those men came from their being relatively celibate or sublimating their sexual drive, and whether their inborn preference be heterosexual or homosexual, it's still a sex drive that will make or break the man.
Nikola Tesla is one such heterosexual celibate genius, Friedrich Nietzsche might be another.
The fact that certain gay geniuses may have had to remain closeted homosexuals could have forced them to sublimate their energies into their specialties rather than toward chasing men. Another possibility is that certain behaviors by celibates may have had them considered by others to be gay or bisexual simply because they never had the drive to interact with women with great fervor. People get called gay in high school all the time for not going around to get laid or having a girlfriend: It doesn't mean they're gay.
It could more than likely mean they have other priorities and/or they are too socially-inept to get a girl.
We all are innately bi-sexual.
Mostly wrong. Women are the gender who are innately bisexual.
Men are either turned on more by women or by men, they have no choice. The men in the above linked study noted that they were only turned on by the films of their innately-preferred gender.
Tie this into the previous post about homosexual male brains resembling hetero female brains, and you'll see all signs pointing toward inborn sexuality.
Sure, a homosexual can learn
to repress their gay urges in the closet and pretend to be straight and maybe stick his dick in a wet (female) hole or two, or a straight man can learn to tolerate taking it in the ass and sucking on cock, but neither of those situations are their inborn preferences.