Nationalist: Preserve culture and bloodline.
(Stalinist) Communist: Abolish the free market. The state should monopolize the market so that everybody works for the state for a comparative wage while profits go directly to the state.
Authoritarian: The state should be considered more important than religion.
Ecofascist: Strict environmental guidelines. Eugenics are enforced.
Overall a high quality of life and expansion of the territories (gaining resources) would be high on my agenda if I were a true revolutionary. But I'm a philosophical nihilist and not affiliated with any political group. I'm just mentioning utopian ideals here (as requested, right?) not practical/local politics.
Hasn't most of this been tried before? Mainly Communism and authoritarianism? I think there is enough evidence to suggest that it fails relatively quickly. If people's lives are merely for the preservation of a "state" , what kind of existence is that? All you will be doing is working day in and day out with no real incentive but to make a secular organization wealthier. I think society needs at least some sort of spirituality that makes them feel a sense of awe and puts them in their place while making the transcendent a goal to work towards. Of course, this spirituality should be grounded in nature and culture. "The Earth is the truth". What I'm saying is, people need more than a state. They need to know that they can excel past their peers if they can prove themselves worthy and find themselves working towards a higher goal than "the state". Also, lets face it, NO ONE wants to live in a Communistic, authoritarian society.
I'm totally on board with nationalism, no complaints there. Reasonable nationalism is a sign of a healthy society.
To me, just setting the bar low and have everyone make the same money is exactly what we want to avoid. That is basically egalitarianism and fake "equality". Let those who are intelligent and can create make more and reward them.
You lost credibility by stating that "NO ONE wants to live in a Communistic, authoritarian society." There's no way that you can prove that. You're making assumptions and generalizations. The many communists organizations and literature that's out there proves you wrong, reality proves you wrong. If you really want to mess up then you should suggest now that all those communist intellectuals and activists are all kids/retards/cons/have something wrong with them/etc. You can't prove that either, it would just be even more generalizations.
I mean, come on... What kind of arguing is this? "I think there is enough evidence to suggest that it fails relatively quickly." That sounds very insecure man, plus you suggest there is evidence but don't offer any... So what do you know for sure?
Let's look at the basics: what good is an excess of wealth in an ecofascist society? There is no way you can combine a free market with ecofascism. There is no way you can run an ecofascist state and then tell people "it's ok for you to have a heated swimming pool in your backyard but not for them" or "it's ok for you to pollute the environment more than others because you are special" etc. Hence everybody would have to follow the same ecofascist rules, there's no place for luxury!
So everybody makes roughly the same amount of money. Useless people are killed. People who achieve things get status, awards, higher places in business and society. But not more money. The point is that people should work for something bigger than themselves (the state) and if that's too much trouble for them then they are untermenschen (selfish capitalists) and have no place in an ecofascist/communist society.
Religion could be used as a tool to empower the state but I feel that people who have a need to believe in irrational fairytales are undesirable too. I don't see the point in giving preachers the same power as the state (or even more power because after all religion controls "the afterlife") I'd also dare say that the communists achieved a hell of a lot more than the muslim fundamentalists did. Soviet Russia certainly had a higher quality of life than Afghanistan did under the Taliban, I'm not in favor of returning back to the stone age. And don't be fooled by an economic crisis such as in Cuba, the embargo forced by the Americans is to blame for that, not Fidel Castro or just having a communist system. If a nation has resources that the world really needs then the world will do business with them anyway regardless of their convictions and how they deal with human rights etc, just look at Saudi Arabia or China.
Look at Prince Charles. Does he look like a leftist?
He looks like a monkey. And he wants to be someone's tampon...
* Charles to Camilla, in an intercepted telephone call: "I want to feel my way along you, all over you and up and down you and in and out. Oh God, I'll just live inside your trousers or something -- it would be much easier."
* Camilla: "What are you going to turn into, a pair of knickers? Oh, you're going to come back as a pair of knickers."
* Charles: "Or, God forbid, a Tampax (tampon). Just my luck!" Camilla: "You are a complete idiot! Oh, what a wonderful idea."
"Let's look at the basics: what good is an excess of wealth in an ecofascist society? There is no way you can combine a free market with ecofascism."
Ha, advocates for Marxism/Communism on the ANUS boards, this is rich.
"If you really want to mess up then you should suggest now that all those communist intellectuals and activists are all kids/retards/cons/have something wrong with them/etc"
Sure I can. Most of them were liberals or leftists of some shape or form. Leftism is at its very root delusional and rejects reality. Marx was a hack.
You are aware that the various Communist regimes have raped the Earth too, correct? Also, why do you seem to assume that the only real alternative to capitalism is Communism?
Fact is, Communism simply does not work on a mass scale. We have seen this on many occasions throughout history. All Communism has ever done is create misery, genocide, broken people and failed states.
People need an incentive. You cannot tell me that a doctor will want to do all of the study, work and undergo all of the stress that goes along with his job and receive the same money as a janitor. It simply will not happen.
You're not going to like this but: Money is not a bad thing. Money is not the problem. People are the problem. To fix the fact that people spend their money on shit we have to reshape our culture starting with ourselves.
Ok, I want you to take everything that is considered a luxury and get rid of it immediately. That includes your computer, car, refrigeration, heating and AC etc etc etc . Put your money where your mouth is.
As for me:
-I am a pan-nationalist.
-I favor smaller, more intimate communities with an emphasis on localism and community togetherness.
-Zero immigration unless you are valuable or a genius. English only.
-Communities will be organized so they are largely walkable/bike-a-ble.
-Nuclear power will be championed.
-Leaders will be strictly appointed by a tough meritocratic system. Only the best can lead in any area.
-Elected ruler with restrictions. Limited Monarchy.
-Large swathes of land shall be restricted for non-use by any human. National parks will be set aside for people to use.