you'll find that more often than not, the vast majority of these right wing crusaders who claim to be acting in pursuit of a world free of socialism or whatever hatred of economic policy is currently in vogue are being worked into a lather by plutocrats. among the most virulent of class warriors, you'll find a comparable lack of judgement as far as the ability to discern where their raison d'etre(s) are originating. marginal intellects are easily convinced that their governments are the cause of a society's ills, and while that may have been true several hundred years ago, the role of government has been relegated to little more than tackle dummy status. the actual coordinators are doing their utmost to insure that people point their fingers everywhere in order to create a groundswell of sentiment against governments that stand in the way of plutocratic interests. the easiest to mislead in this effort are people who believe they are acting to preserve bloodlines or ancient rites/rights; if I can convince you that your soul is being sullied by a group of corrupt public officials, you're quite likely to fall into line. in reality, they're helping to do the same kind of dirty work that occurs every time a plane-full of Fusarium is dropped on Colombia. the folks who do that work are fond of words like "social cleansing," too. if one reads any of Mr. Breivik's provincial ramblings, you'll learn that he believes a so-called "super capitalist" economy ("such as the U.S.") is the best option for Europe. this speaks to a staggering misunderstanding of capitalism and its eternal love affair with multiculturalism.
what has struck me about the aftermath of yesterday's killing is the extraordinary naivete present in the words of the statements I've read online and elsewhere. there seems to be a sincere level of shock that a beady-eyed Aryan could be responsible for the kind of death toll that's been reported. this would seem to align rather favorably with the perception that all violent acts are perpetrated by people with dark skin (of course, we have a very wide range of historical data that contradicts this supposition). the most popular brown-skinned folks who seem to be responsible for each and every act of terror inflicted upon innocent white people hail from the middle east, and, logically, they were automatically the first suspects within minutes of the Oslo story going public. if one is to read the many comments posted on other forums and websites hosted by the news media, you'll find scores of people who are unable to reckon that a fair-skinned person could harm anything. we had to endure similar nonsense after the events in Oklahoma City over 15 years ago. this cognitive dissonance will continue until the next filthy, dark-skinned man in a sheet shouting Allah Akbar kills a few dozen people and the natural order of white passivity can be restored.