Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Diversity always fails

Diversity always fails
January 14, 2012, 09:12:21 PM
The problem is not Muslims, or African-Americans, or even Caucasians. It's diversity itself.

If you are part of a group, it's because your ancestors did something differently, and you have been shaped by that. Your attitudes are not your own; they're mostly genetic and reflect among other things your abilities and strengths.

Anywhere diversity is tried, these unique abilities are destroyed. The result is friction and ultimate, racial, religious, ethnic, class and social conflict.

Fighting broke out between crowds of Muslims and police when a mosque was demolished - for being an 'illegal religious place'.

Violence erupted in the town of Hexi, in China's northwest Ningxia region, after 1,000 officers arrived to help police the knocking down of the building.

More than 50 protesters were injured and 100 arrested after several hundred members of China's Muslim Hui minority tried to stop the demolition.


What are the Chinese supposed to do? Follow the West into suicidal pluralism, where so much internal conflict and competition exists that we can no longer manufacture a reliable coffee maker?

Hell no. They'll boot the tiny Muslim population if they have to because the remaining 90% who are ethnically Han will take over the world.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 15, 2012, 11:25:18 AM
Diversity has merit, it is absolute diversity that is absolute destruction. Many nations contained a variety of ethnic and religious groups; as long as the supporting one is ascendant diversity is a boon. How about the problem is Caucasians after all, who don't give a flying fuck about their heritage and continuity?

The Hui and other Turkics/Muslims occupy particular geographical areas of China, they do not threaten Han homogeneity. However, mistreating them may have detrimental effects on China's relationship with certain neighbours.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 15, 2012, 03:47:25 PM
I think part of the great comedy about "diversity" is that even diversity advocates hate diversity. The end-game is anti-diversity when we all mingle into a gray egalitarian mass of consumers.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 16, 2012, 12:12:43 AM
Diversity is unavoidable, but it is the general rule of homogeneity that makes for a stable system.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 16, 2012, 07:53:51 AM
Diversity is unavoidable, but it is the general rule of homogeneity that makes for a stable system.

isn't this more or less what China was doing anyway? Destroying a mosque that is valued by a minority in favor of values of the majority?

Last I knew, America had some semblance of written mission statements, but they seem about as worthless as the paper they were wrote on if general population chooses to pander to special interest minorities.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 16, 2012, 11:45:13 AM
" Some form of sentiment, deriving from out orientation toward the world, lies at the base of all congeniality. Vanishing, it leaves cities and nations mere empirical communities, which are but people living together in one place, without friendship or common understanding....On the other side is the metaphysical comminity, suffused with a common feeling about the world which enables all vocations to meet without embarassment and to enjoy the strength that comes of common tendency"

-Richard Weaver-

This reasoning does much to explain the dangers of diversity and clearly explains what I percieve to be the underlying social philosophy of both ANUS and Amerika.

Re: Diversity always fails
January 17, 2012, 07:38:06 AM
Diversity fails when it becomes policy or rather, a goal. Empires, although not explicitly stated, tend to strive for diversity. This is so because when expanding terrority, it is rare that the indigenous population is replaced completely by the conquering lands. All too often, an Empire tends to absorb peoples as it expands. They do tend to force aherence to their culture. While this is successful to a point, it tends to be rather difficult to erase generations of ethnic and cultural identity. Thus, diversity as a goal fails.

Re: Diversity always fails
February 05, 2012, 07:28:04 AM
The multiculturalists are inherently condescending, believing that all groups should score well on the White Man's Tests, and if not, they'll fake the results. This results in the degradation of many groups:

Although we do not know the statistics for the Posse students, we do have reason to doubt their academic qualifications as a group. At least one student flunked out and several took leaves of absence for academic reasons. A 1998 evaluation of the Posse program at Vanderbilt University found that athletes entered with an average of 1042 SAT score and maintained an average GPA of 3.13, while Posse students came in with a 900 average SAT and finished with a 2.93 average GPA. Due to the low grades of Posse students in their engineering programs, Rice and Lehigh canceled their involvement with Posse, according to the L.A. Times in 2004.


A better solution is to recognize that "one culture, one land" is the only sensible rule.

Diversity (of any kind: religious, cultural, ethnic/racial, political, aptitudinal) always fails, wherever it is tried and throughout history.

Re: Diversity always fails
February 05, 2012, 10:47:18 AM
Judging the Other by whitey's yard stick (are they modern enough? liberal enough? educated enough?) is bigotry masquerading as anti-racism and tolerance.

Re: Diversity always fails
April 29, 2012, 09:07:34 AM
“The University of California system has been raising tuitions and cutting departments,” Barone writes, but “its San Diego campus found the money to create a new post of ‘vice chancellor for equity, diversity and inclusion.’”

That’s in addition to what the Manhattan Institute’s Heather Mac Donald calls its “already massive diversity apparatus.” It takes Mac Donald 103 words just to list the titles of UCSD’s diversitycrats.

Here are Heather Mac Donald’s 103 words (City Journal):

the Chancellor’s Diversity Office, the associate vice chancellor for faculty equity, the assistant vice chancellor for diversity, the faculty equity advisors, the graduate diversity coordinators, the staff diversity liaison, the undergraduate student diversity liaison, the graduate student diversity liaison, the chief diversity officer, the director of development for diversity initiatives, the Office of Academic Diversity and Equal Opportunity, the Committee on Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Issues, the Committee on the Status of Women, the Campus Council on Climate, Culture and Inclusion, the Diversity Council, and the directors of the Cross-Cultural Center, the Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender Resource Center, and the Women’s Center.


Re: Diversity always fails
April 29, 2012, 12:00:08 PM
“The results weren’t heartening. Overall, 46 percent of Millennials agree that the government pays too much attention to the problems of minorities, with 49 percent who disagree. 48 percent also agree that discrimination against whites is a genuine problem. When you disaggregate by race and count only white Millennials, the picture is much worse.

A solid majority of white Millennials, 56 percent, say that government has paid too much attention to the problems of blacks and other minorities. An even larger majority, 58 percent, say that “discrimination against whites has become as big a problem as discrimination against blacks and other minorities.”


Re: Diversity always fails
April 30, 2012, 06:08:59 AM
You can have it two ways. Either we are all the same and no one gets any special treatment, which makes blacks look bad because most of them are poor and in jail. Or we are not the same, and blacks need special treatment, which makes blacks look bad because we have to treat them like retarded children. They also have to decide whether they want to be African or American.