Why deconstruct evil?
If you are unhappy with the word evil, why don't you take the next step and deconstruct the word "chair", or something?
What's the point? Only evil deserves to be deconstructed because only children adhere to concepts of good and evil?
If someone comes and say "I think the concept of degenerate sex should be re-evalued... It should not address inserting banana up my male ass while I sodomize a dog. That's christian morality"
What I mean is there is some interest behind the deconstruction.
I go so far as to state that the struggle between good and evil defines our whole human existence.
The only difference is not that good and evil does not exist for some, there are two things:
1. The conceptions of good and evil change from person to person or group
2. Some people alternate between different models of good and evil, in fact all do (for example, in times of great pressure it can change) but the psychopatic do not have a standart good/evil model, but they always do have one (hardly you will see a psychopath accepting to be maimed - that would be evil for him? Unless he/she gets sexually aroused or something - in that case the excitement would be good).
The only people who trasncend that shit are the ones who transcended a lot more. I mean, why should the person who transcended good & evil be the one torturing innocents? Does that mean he has transcended?
Good and evil may not exist... but im from the path where to transcend that, you get first knee-deep in the good and evil shit until you bypass it.... and then there's death.