So Rob Darken's statement are not relevant? Not even somewhat? I disagree, I think Rob's statements are relevant, although presented in a slightly sentimental manner. Is he an expert? Perhaps not, but that does not mean he has not discovered some inkling of truth.
I get the feeling you just disagree with Darken, thats fine, but why are you so hostile to the people that agree, or see some relevance in what he is saying? Is it because he is not qualified to make such statements? If so, by what means could Darken become qualified?