I have an intellectually disabled son and if anyone came around my home with the intent of causing harm, I would feed them their own intestines
Internet tough guy. If you and your tard wanted to live near me, I'd run you both out with a shotgun for being parasites.
secondly, for supposed traditionalists you parroting a view that was developed in the early 20th century
No. Societies have killed defectives for a long time. Even executing murders fits into this category.
Anyone who has actually spent time with someone with one of these disabilities can see a purer, more transgressive humanity
Did I just accidentally tune in to the justification channel?
Actually, this guy very likely would literally kill you in order to protect his kid. Like most people would. There's nothing internet tough-guy about it. A lot of people would sooner die than allow you to carry out your campaign of tard slaying. The number of people willing to kill and die to defend their sub-120 friends or relatives is almost certainly higher than the number of people who are willing to kill and die for the distant (and highly questionable) abstraction of your 'better society without the dumbs'. You can't just pretend this away.
Also - this whole notion that 'when things get hard enough' the idea of massacring adults with IQs below 120 will suddenly become a realistic plan in the minds of all those people out there who are currently Obama-voting liberals or conservative Christians is totally ridiculous. It's the same thing that radical utopian idealists have always been claiming about their movements: the Marxists insist that one day the proletariat will develop an internationalist class consciousness, the white nationalists insist that one day white people will wake up and stop reproducing with non-whites, etc, etc, etc. It's always somewhere on the horizon, right over the hill in the next decade. These kind of people never realize that: 1.) few are convinced about their assessment of 'the problem' and their prescribed cures, which are typically crude, simplistic, apocalyptic and absolute; 2.) human communities and individuals have a great capacity for adapting to strenuous situations, and will often face physical hardship and sometimes even the threat of annihilation rather than sacrifice their value systems and worldviews.
Nobody is going to get in line to kill half of the people they know. It is a self-indulgent fantasy, and the continuing attachment that people on this site have to this idea is hard to understand when there are more realistic ways to address the same problems. These include: legislated limitations on childbirth based upon various criteria, sterilization of criminals and sociopaths, universal and easy access to abortion, finding a way to mandate the use of birth control, etc, etc.
P.S: on a personal level - which DOES matter for 'leaders' - your inability to articulate yourself or address criticisms without resorting to passive aggression and snideness is a real failing. You realize it just looks like impotent bitterness to everyone else, right? You're not going to get very far in your social revolution acting like this.