High Kwality Education

[Wild]

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4590

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

[MediterraneanSun]

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

Well, I have to disagree with you my friend. Even women outside of relationships don't need this kind of "education" because they are going to discover sex anyway if the do the right choices in life. And doing the right choices is a matter completely unrelated to liberal indoctrination, or any indoctrination at all. Well in fact I guess that this "program" would not even help women who have difficulties attracting men at all.

The problem with all these people is that they don't tackle actual problems, they just have a certain, simple, subconscious thought process. 1) They start from a trendy subject (i.e. What can be done to help the poor) and 2) they choose the most nice-sounding way to proceed (i.e. give'em money so they can be like us happy liberal professors).

Exactly the same happens with sex in our society. The people who are left entirely out of anyone's attention are, of course, the ones who don't have trendy sounding problems. For example girls who might be pretty but are not as slutty to draw the morons' attention (they're damn conservative fascist bitches man). Or let's say victims of integration and white flight in USA or South Africa whatever.

LET'S EXTERMINATE THE PEOPLE WHO SUFFER BECAUSE OF UN-TRENDY PROBLEMS!!! We are against the barbaric thing called natural selection but .... they're bad and they should die!

[aquarius]

High Kwalité Education

or

How Spiritual Deformity Manifests in the Guise of Liberation

[Wild]

This class would not exist if couples were in relationships that were healthy and promoted the family. it's a symptom of modern decay that causes these people to think that the goal of a relationship is merely to 'get off' in the worst way possible and then they wonder why they feel unfulfilled.

I don't see many conservative, healthy women attending this class.

[Humanicide]

I don't see any healthy women (left or right) attending this class, period. This is a class for people who either watch too much porn, are frumpy, or are nuts and can't keep a man.

[§Transcix]

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4590

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

So you're saying that if women knew how to achieve good orgasms then they wouldn't need to attend a class on how to achieve good organisms? You're such a fucking genius, dude. Sex is not so simple. I practice tantric sex so let me tell you there's lots to learn about energy and state of mind and you can have so many types of experiences, to claim that it's a sign of weakness to seek education in this department as if you should automatically just know how to do it is utterly ludicrous. But your women probably fake their orgasms so perhaps you're not aware of the complexities.

[aquarius]

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4590

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

So you're saying that if women knew how to achieve good orgasms then they wouldn't need to attend a class on how to achieve good organisms? You're such a fucking genius, dude. Sex is not so simple.

Really it is quite simple. If people actually love the person they are having sex with then there will be no division of flesh and spirit. It's a matter of either finding one worthwhile person to dedicate yourself or diluting your capacity for love by only thinking of physical pleasure.

[beyond_godlike]

While this class is not likely to actually help anyone, I don't oppose these kinds of lessons. There's no reason to restrict education to academic subjects. The personal aspect of education is almost entirely neglected. Personal lessons only go as far as to say to never question authority and to always be middle of the road and which professions are good ones. That is insane. People who were not anything about life find themselves suddenly overwhelmed by a foreign world tat they were completely unaware of due to the irrational obscuring of the real world parents and educators are expected to do. I can definitely imagine the existence of a considerable number of women who either don't know women can orgasm, or that they personally are able to. This is especially true for women from very conservative and very liberal communities, though for different reasons. The liberal women would only have encountered men who have been considered that masculinity is evil and that being in a perpetual state of malnourishment and hunger is healthy. These people can not satisfy a woman and the women being convinced of the superiority of these men would be utterly baffled as to the cause of their dissatisfaction since other men can only be worse.

[§Transcix]

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4590

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

So you're saying that if women knew how to achieve good orgasms then they wouldn't need to attend a class on how to achieve good organisms? You're such a fucking genius, dude. Sex is not so simple.

Really it is quite simple. If people actually love the person they are having sex with then there will be no division of flesh and spirit. It's a matter of either finding one worthwhile person to dedicate yourself or diluting your capacity for love by only thinking of physical pleasure.

So you can have sex for hours with multiple orgasms?

[aquarius]

http://www.campusreform.org/blog/?ID=4590

Perhaps if these women were in real relationships, they wouldn't need a class for this.

So you're saying that if women knew how to achieve good orgasms then they wouldn't need to attend a class on how to achieve good organisms? You're such a fucking genius, dude. Sex is not so simple.

Really it is quite simple. If people actually love the person they are having sex with then there will be no division of flesh and spirit. It's a matter of either finding one worthwhile person to dedicate yourself or diluting your capacity for love by only thinking of physical pleasure.

So you can have sex for hours with multiple orgasms?

That's not really the point I was getting at. Besides, inability to achieve orgasm is thought to be largely psychological in origin which ties in well with the widespread disintegration of tradition relationships. I think this issue would naturally resolve in people that find true love.

[fallot]

You don't see "healthy" women attending this? I would be enormously surprised if they didn't That would mean this isn't the dominant cultural dogma after all, just something loudly pushed by an extreme minority. Plus, given opportunities to indulge, women are just the more indulgent sex. Ideology and biology are not in as much harmony, they are less rational, conformist.

And what is this talk of "people" "person" etc. aquarius? Two rational entities experiencing mutual and equal attraction dubbed "true love"... turn your cynicism back on please. Traditionalism is well and good but dont let it turn into airy fairy bullshit. This issue would resolve itself if you have men that turn women on banging the shit out of them (with societal controls on promiscuity). You're right, its psychological, but it sure as hell isn't about finding love. It's about finding balls... the love is an aftereffect, the reward.

[Examiner]

This is nothing more than a reason to act like a degenerate in a large group of people who act the same. Here`s an example of what this "sex education" really is http://redhotrussia.com/oral-sex-lessons-moscow/

[NHA]

Traditionalism is well and good but don't let it turn into airy fairy bullshit.

But...but... modernism is like bad man. If only society were more traditional i surely wouldn't be such a social pariah... right... right?

Do healthy people sit around whining about some irrelevant class that costs peanuts to run and teaches a practical skill?

People here need to stop using their sparse knowledge of philosophy and politics as an excuse to project and ignore their own dysfunction. If you're unhappy: it's 100% your fault for not being able to cope with your environment.

Learn to interact with the stupid animals at the appropriate level:
Dogs are for petting.
Vapid sluts are for sodomizing.
Serious women are for loving.
Perfect women are for writing terrible poetry and slashing your wrists.

[aquarius]

And what is this talk of "people" "person" etc. aquarius? Two rational entities experiencing mutual and equal attraction dubbed "true love"... turn your cynicism back on please. Traditionalism is well and good but dont let it turn into airy fairy bullshit. This issue would resolve itself if you have men that turn women on banging the shit out of them (with societal controls on promiscuity). You're right, its psychological, but it sure as hell isn't about finding love. It's about finding balls... the love is an aftereffect, the reward.

By this reasoning, love could develop out of a one night stand? I doubt it. There is no division between love and sex in a traditional view of the relationship. A guy either pursues sex (nightclubs, broads being passed around a football team) or actually dedicates himself to one worthwhile girl (death-stares anyone that looks at her). It’s really a matter of sacred versus profane, or perhaps I'm just a 'clean-freak'.

Do healthy people sit around whining about some irrelevant class that costs peanuts to run and teaches a practical skill?

It’s irrelevant and yet it teaches a practical skill?

At any rate, the point of such a 'class' isn’t really to teach anything but to further push the boundaries of accepted social norms (as though any form of change amounts to ‘progress’).

People here need to stop using their sparse knowledge of philosophy and politics as an excuse to project and ignore their own dysfunction. If you're unhappy: it's 100% your fault for not being able to cope with your environment.

In a casual discussion someone calls modernity dysfunctional. You step in to defend it with some kind of “get with the program” type statement while at the same time appearing unconcerned. Is it not possible that a totally functional person might find fault in the world? I just can’t understand this viewpoint as it seem to recognise the modern world as a shithole but then resorts to accepting it as the only solution.

[NHA]

It’s irrelevant in the sense that it's a minor event with little to no impact.

At any rate, the point of such a 'class' isn’t really to teach anything but to further push the boundaries of accepted social norms

It's both. Are we surprised that schools indoctrinate? The proles need to be told what to think, what to listen to, and how to dress.

as though any form of change amounts to ‘progress’.

Right, but cheap sentimentality for the past is pretty much the conservative's analogue to this.

In a casual discussion someone calls modernity dysfunctional. You step in to defend it with some kind of “get with the program” type statement while at the same time appearing unconcerned.
...
I just can’t understand this viewpoint as it seem to recognise the modern world as a shithole but then resorts to accepting it as the only solution.

I'm defending nothing. Your assumption makes no sense, yet you refuse to question its reasoning. That's really one of the underlying points.

Is it not possible that a totally functional person might find fault in the world?

Society is flawed, people are flawed and the world is flawed. A healthy person acknowledges this and doesn't constantly dwell on it. Most activists (feminists in particular) tend to just be butthurt about one thing or another and use their cause to inflate themselves or transfer blame for their own shortcomings. Their thinking is pretty much dominated by confirmation bias and thus they see symptoms of their cause in everything around them.