I'm not sure if chuck found meaning within his later work, only that it certainly fell away from creating something expressive and moved more towards proving himself as a musician within mixed genres.
You're not sure that he found meaning in his later work, but you have the audacity to accuse him of not..... that is COMPLETELY MORONIC! He knew he had cancer by then and you think he's just gonna throw a bunch of shit together just because he wanted to prove he can play guitar, all the while disregarded expressing what he was going through. That's just laughable.
Dimebag lived for playing his guitar, but as an artist its always been apparent that his work was more of passion through skill rather than vision.
Always the spokesperson, so now you know what Dimebag's vision was. I can see that you're definitely an elitist. His vision doesn't fit yours, so it must be shit. So you have to dog everyone else just so that you can feel special, well your music is just as shitty as everyone else's.
Which brings me to ask;
are you a musician?
If so, Are you in a band?
I will not ask who, but I want to hear some of it, because it has to be amongst the greatest of artforms.
as Hume would say, the contrary is always possible, making it only probability.
Does that eliminate the process of making intelligent accusations? Judging by that quote, I can accuse you of being a gay, dog lover and only beastiality keeps you from commiting suicide. You may say that you're not, but the contrary is always possible. Now I'm just trying to establish how much freedom you're providing yourself to accuse others of (or not) living up to your greatness, then maybe we can be on the same level of what can be established based on opinion.
I'll leave this response with, "You're a work of art!"