If you take issue with someone's action, you probably consider what they're doing wrong. Injustice is at the root of senseless cruelty, so it's probably unjust also.
What is mathematics applied to the evolutionary process (what philosopher Thomas Campbell calls "the fundamental process")? It is considering the POSITIVE PERCENTAGE on the NEGATIVE EVENT.
If by witnessing 5 gross, cruel events, you are able to perceive, even in the midst of those cruel, damned hearts, 5% of good will, you can, IF YOU'RE STRONG AND WISE, extract the 25 PERCENT of good will from all those bad subjects.
IF YOU DO IT PERSONALLY AND SILENTLY, nobody needs to no. It is just reality calculus.
If you promote openly, you're encouraging thr mindlesness and stupidity.
What I mean is, extract what you comprehended from evil situations, the knowledge, the understanding. But never do so in public, or you will be supporting the evil action. People like Ildjarn are hateful and evil.
He said he wanted to magically take control of a plane, for god's sake, and have fun witht he horror of killing everybody in it. And not in self defense to attack an enemy target, like the muslims, but for sheer cruelty.
So when we support artists like these, we do it for what they bring ARTISTICALLY and our Id, which is mathematical, comprehends the big picture of cruelty. To understand it is one thing, to condone it, another.
Why are nationalists attacking ideals like multi culturalism? Do you have any idea the pain and innocent victims that separating the races will cause? That's why David Myatt changed. He got Good. Christ is real, but he is not a man. If you analyze many nationalist ideas, they attack concepts like: Freedom, love towards people independent of profit, charity, helping poor people, condone bullying which creates psychological scars and produces school shootings. Many conservatives also seem to think rape is only bad in certain situations, that the woman should keep the child product of rape, that women are here only to serve men (they are here for this, but not ONLY this), that women who wear tight and small clothing deserved to be rape, that a woman who drank too much should be raped, that woman should not care about being treated as only a juicy cunt in the workplace, streets, media and other places. Guess what, if you gotta watch your woman so she doesn't do anything wrong, it's probably because you were not enough of a man to fascinate her, or she doesn't really like you. The woman should worship the man and serve him with pleasure. Women are behaving badly now because men aren't being strong, except in exceptions where the woman just likes the man regardless. Plus it doesn't make sense to at the same time think women, like secretaries for example, should put out, and at the same time be moral with YOUR woman. Only the open slut should be treated like so, but many ofthem are just misguided in this world. If you want women to be chaste, you better inspire yourself in the muslims and old christian morals, and behave accordingly. Don't masturbate to porn and then expect women to be prude.
But am I against racial preservation? I too think multiculturalism, IN PLACES WITH A ETHNIC TRADITION, is harmful, and I don't mind, for example, the japanese not being nice to foreigners. Although I'm sure if I was there, in japan, they would like me. They like people like me. The girls would love me. I'll be a tourist there some day and it's gonna be AWESOME. A whole culture degraded during the post war years, but is it worst than their cruel years? Than the Naking Massacre?