You're wrong, historically speaking. Hitler defended the working German from large corporate interests. The problem with the left is that they're so busy trying to get revenge on rich people they forget that it's the appetite of the crowd that empowers the real bastards in this world.
I don't know how any thinking person can defend the left, considering their utterly abysmal record in getting things done. Have they lessened poverty? No. Have they improved "race relations"? No. Have they made women happier? No, now they're all single in their 40s, without families and ignored by men who can chase younger flesh. Left is death.
That being said, I can't think of a real right-wing party at this point in time, and I think it's a mistake to view Hitler's National Socialists as leftists. After all, they were the first government to advance a real environmental plan, and still the only one with a comprehensive one.
Protector, I respect your music, but you're not a historian or philosopher. Let me direct you to something and see how many points you disagree with:
You can see that maybe the modern rightists you see are not representative of the ideas responsible for National Socialism. (Hell, most people are morons. So most rightists are probably morons, too -- but that doesn't mean rightist as correctly interpreted is wrong).
Two, on race... you wonder why America is a cultureless void? A lack of National culture and consensus. Every individual person (the weak) does what they want, and doesn't care about the outcome, so the place becomes a wreck. Cruel corporate leaders manipulate the little dummies and get what they want, every time. That's what the left brings you... dominion by jerks.
The fact is, the crowd needs to be kept in line, because they don't have the judgment to make political decisions, just like you clearly don't understand history (even from an unbiased perspective). You have other things to do. Escapist fantasy heavy metal is one of them. So we should pay attention to the smartest people we have, and their wisdom is anti-crowd.
Personally I am very much in love with Nietzsche and Aristotle. They are the ultimate eugenicist realists who recognize that constant struggle by the better against the lesser is necessary for the better to keep making themselves better, and so staying better, and for the lesser to keep from overwhelming the planet with their numbers.
I consider myself a Anti-Racist Nationalist in that I don't believe in being mean to other races, but I believe in keeping my own apart from all other races by any means necessary. That comes from an understanding of history and the ideas that rule it, and I suggest you explore those intellectual tools before making grand but empty statements.
85 (Heil Eugenics)
remamber times of the industrial revolution where the normal working peole had to work 16 hours a day in cole mines an never even saw the cole mine. the only ones that cared about this situation where the socialist those times. with the help of workers unions they finally could manage that peole work less and less and the might of the super ritch got reduced.
well the problem is that this was 100 years ago, and now people calling them social politicians are rather social politicians because their daddies braught them to this position, but anyway you have to see that historically see they cared far more for their folk than any nazi leader.
actually it is a great advantage for a nazi that the thrid reich did not lats so long and did not end like ht communistic fascistic regimes, so there is more space left for fantasies how great everything would have been those times. but already in this short time you saw how the nazis leader had parties drinking champagne each day whereas the people in war had maybe 2 slices of bread to eat. i often noticed that most of the people can not decide between reality and the images the nazis produced in their propaganda. sure seeing it from the propaganda side everything was super fine, but that always the same with dictatorships. they have great abilities to presentsemselfes nice and fine.
you tell me i am neither a philosopher nor a historian so i shall shut up. why you think you have the right to decide that. and do you think that all people with opposite views are all philosophers and historian. acutally i am write i neither studies philosophy nor hitory in university. but do you think a person has to have finished a study in philosophy or history to be worth to have an opinion about it. isnit is possible for a normal person to read fact and compare them with others and therefore get new conclusions.
dont you think that these line is extremely arrogant?
sorry but i am right now to busy to react on all of the political lines you wrote but i want to concentrate one line
3. We demand land and territory (colonies) to feed our people and to settle our surplus population.
well thats what i mean. nazis are not only nationalits (a i said this is not necessarily bad for me). they are arrogant nationalists thinking their culture is better than others. well funny to read this in a forum that is on an USA server as USA once was a colony full of foreign people that later got independent. USA did not accept to be a colony to feed the people in England. and this complete idea of colonies is super capitalistic and the essence of exploitation and the reason for terror attacks as well.
ok anti-racistic nationalist are indeed not such a problem for me then racisitic one, but still living in austria that historically seen is totally mixed up since decades and centuries (40% of the austrian have obvious Slavonic names for example) i dont share those believes anyway.
Btw years ago i voted against the EU as i see it only as a support for the rich people.