I wasnt clear enough , my bad.
I was going through the topic and it seamed to me that all the suggestions were actually for a better system, radicaly unchanged. Or for a (educational) system to work you need people in charge. My question was Who are these people? and who chooses them, on what basis. An answer shall be: well, the most educated ar fit to educate. Wich is an ok idea if you have strategy that werent obviously wrong on the basis that no great genius/specialist (= an individual that not only knows great deal about the matter (specialist) but can bring novelty to that domain (genius) ) is actually a great teacher, or does he chooses to teach. neeadles to ask the manner in wich you find and recognize great individuals, or great specialist ready and wiling to teach. Use force? But how s that diffrent from the actual system (that uses force for funds and reinterprets almost everything that counts in order to propel itself etc)
So it seems to me that all that s said here is more like an ideal of how current education system should be if you were in charge. And thats like: well this gov sucks lets change it with another.
public education it s obviously wrong: diferent individuals-to-be, with diferent goals stuck together by force, it s no surprise they get so many psychological traumas, they start shooting each other etc Central education is wrong too: why should I send my kids to some school that preaches things i dont agree with: and any official school program is socialistic in essence no matter they wanna look liberal etc This is a melting pot: the intention is to create not smart, intelligent, aware individuals, but citizens: dumb, not minding control, welcoming it as necessary, no matter who runs the show: socialists or democrats, nazis or commies, roadrunner records or anus.com, mandrake or conservationist.
The system in itself obliges to this effect.
so, i think both conservationist and me would rather prefere, him for his kid, me for mine, choosing teachers, choosing schools, after a very attentive analisis of their matter of the school itself, its history etc then just send them over to the state'searly-prisons-for-citizens to be, i mean schools. Stupid parents would choose wrong, but in this system we re all obliged to choose wrong, cause all we got to choose from is what the state decides that s good for the children (be it any gov, liberal, socialist etc) If there are private schools it must be said that they cant exist without gov legal consent (or how they call it) so they are controlled to. (anyhow what school could you have established in this already state-hypnotized times?) the no-state-interference-alternative wouldnt make any slow minded an perfectly culturalized and intelligent human beings, but this actual system tends to make us all as slow minded as it gets.
Look at yourselfs: are your beliefs and your personal cultural knowledge what the 5th grade teacher told you or what you have personaly learned by reading, asking, finding out etc
but still you think the system has to be changed, taken over by individuals that fit your personal beliefs, not pulled to the ground. any political party that you hate thinks the same.