The truth about dating

[Conservationist]

Now that I'm pretty sure my dating life has come to a close, I feel free to divulge some secrets about online dating I've learned over the years. Since 1999, I've met well over 100 women from various websites. I've never paid a penny for a membership at any site, except meet me on hot or not. Yahoo and AOL used to be free, today, plentyoffish, and bangme are two that are still free, and have plenty of ass. For a small fee, 'meet me' on hot or not, will net you plenty of action. Sites like eharmony and match, that require money, are probably a bit different.

Lesson number one, and I learned this quickly. If a chick says anything in her profile about how you should just move on if all you want is a piece of ass, then she will fuck you on the first date.

Lesson number two, if she talks like a stupid kid (like, omg, etc etc), she's a money grubbing bitch. But if you spread a little money around, she will fuck you on the first date.

Lesson number three, if you can set up your first date with a girl starting at a porn store, then she'll fuck you, on the first date, in a preview booth. (this irritates the fuck out of the losers that don't have a woman)

Lesson number four, if she has cats, run. Trust me, run.

Lesson number five, when she has 4 kids, and says she's not lookin for a daddy for her kids, she's looking for a daddy for her kids.

Lesson number six, if she seems like a great girl, (really sweet, yet fun, doesn't seem like a whore...) then she's in a manic stage, and will go downhill soon.

Lesson number seven. pictures of you with a cute puppy are stronger than kryptonite.

Lesson number eight. Pic that shows your eyes really well. Women think all eyes are hot, it makes you look like a nice guy, so it's disarming to the 18 girls online that don't want to fuck you on the first date.

Lesson number nine. If the first date is at her place, it doesn't matter if you wear pajamas over, she'll still fuck you.

Lesson number ten. drive the conversation towards texting asap. Women will say shit in a text message that will make satan blush. They'll send pics too.

Lesson number eleven. shirtless pic of yourself. don't do it. I don't care if you make Jay Cutler look fat. It's common. You don't want to do what most guys do. If you can make a woman say "he's not like the rest" what she's really saying is "he's not like the rest, I'll suck his dick"

Lesson number twelve, let them know that you're tired of women that treat you like an average guy. It's not really victimizing yourself, but it puts them in a protective mode. Then they'll comfort you. Probably on the first date.

Thirteen. DO NOT EXPECT A REAL RELATIONSHIP OFF THE FREE WEBSITES. A certain type of women use the free sites.

Fourteen. Don't lie. ever. EVER. No need. And it makes you the bad guy. You don't wanna be that, you will get put on the websites dedicated to bad guys. "don't date him girl.com" shit like that, plus, now days, a lotta women respect that, and only want you for your cock anyway, so you may just meet a good long term fuck buddy.

Fifteen, trust your gut. Watch for clues. I was talking to one chick that told me she was single. She sent me a pic of her in the bathroom mirror and I saw a man's razor and axe bodywash. Instant bail.

I'm not a super attractive guy, I'm on the heavy side, and I've had some fucking smoking hot women do horribly evil and fun things to me within minutes of meeting me in person. Yes, banged women in porn booths y'all have seen plenty of them in my old botd threads from back in the day.

After years and years of doing this, I've found the love of my life. I didn't meet her online, I've known her for ten years. I just didn't realize it.

see rule 13. You're not gonna find a real lady on the free sites. Mostly just pieces of ass.

The clueless, neurotic, ego-dramatic can only be pieces of meat, despite all their protestations to the contrary.

Increasingly, I think most people do not have souls.

[Humanicide]

"Lesson number one, and I learned this quickly. If a chick says anything in her profile about how you should just move on if all you want is a piece of ass, then she will fuck you on the first date."

"Lesson number five, when she has 4 kids, and says she's not lookin for a daddy for her kids, she's looking for a daddy for her kids."

Those are two of my favorites. Haha.

People who sign up for dating sites are just people who either want to get laid or are so ugly/socially inept that they wouldn't even be able to hold a conversation or be noticed by others in real life. I like the whole moral at the end, where he finds love and happiness right in front of him all along. That should be an indicator for others.

[Necrophiliac]

I'm actually a little miffed that I did not receive a bro-fist and a can of PBR upon finishing that read.

[Umbrage]

Most fuck books are written from the standpoint of “Here are tips to
trick stupid women.” And most of them tell you “Don’t let women know
you’re reading this book.”
Fuck all that.
This book is not about how to trick stupid women. It’s about how to
better engage in equitable, consensual hot sex with smart women.
And you shouldn’t hide this book from women. Hell, you could get laid
from just being seen reading this book. And many women are preordering
it as a gift for their man.
I don’t trick women. I love women. I celebrate them. I adore them.
And they adore me.

How To Fuck A Woman's Brains Out

Straight forward e-book about getting into a lasting BDSM type relationship. Funny and informative, worth a read if you're confused about love or relationships.

I know that men dominate women in fucking, I know that many women
want to be held down and violated. My fix on the stupid old saying,
“Women just want to be dragged off to a cave and raped...” is my
addendum, “...WITH PERMISSION...BY SOMEONE THEY LOVE.”

True rape is horrible. Actual rapists should be ground into cat food.

But good, hard consensual sex, the type I like, the type where two (or
more) people agree to have sex, and fuck each other’s brains out,
when it’s done right, is consensual rape. There is something so arcane
and mystical about this dance that we do...it is somehow frighteningly
beautiful - as well as being beautifully frightening. A woman has it in
her nature to want to be forcefully taken by a man. Kissing is lovemaking,
and it is awe-inspiring....but fucking is not making love. A good
fuck is more a consensual rape then an act of love. That is the nature
of the beast, and the beast of the nature.

I feel like Jesus’ son on all the smack in Manhattan when one of God’s
sisters is open before me like a flower, taking my cock deep into her
womb with rhythmic, convulsive swallows while clawing rivers into my
back. And women feel about ten times as good as this if you hold ‘em
down and fuck ‘em right.

Unfortunately, a lot of women end up with assholes instead of loving
dominant men. The woman’s DNA confuses a hard attitude, a type-A
personality, or even asskickings with strength. Women are programmed
for the survival of the species, automated to mate with the superior
partner. But since society generally believes that dominating women
lovingly doesn’t exist, not much mainstream educational materials are
available to women to show them the difference. So they end up with
the asshole, because none of their sweet sisters has sat down and
explained it to them.

But what a lot of women really want, is to for a sweet, smart man that
they love to “fuck them like they hate them.” And they want it done
with love, and respect, even as the man is calling her a filthy whore.
And they want a man who can do all that, and make them smile and
think with conversation between all the orgasms.

[My AIDS, Your Arse]

Taking tranny-Fenriz's post up there into consideration, I wonder how ANUSites feel about "Game" and that whole PUA deal.

My interest was piqued in it again when I came across this article:
The Sixteen Commandments of Poon

Straightforward and useful advice here.

III. You shall make your mission, not your woman, your priority

Forget all those romantic cliches of the leading man proclaiming his undying love for the woman who completes him. Despite whatever protestations to the contrary, women do not want to be “The One” or the center of a man’s existence. They in fact want to subordinate themselves to a worthy man’s life purpose, to help him achieve that purpose with their feminine support, and to follow the path he lays out. You must respect a woman’s integrity and not lie to her that she is “your everything”. She is not your everything, and if she is, she will soon not be anymore.

[...]

XV. Maintain your state control

You are an oak tree. You will not be manipulated by crying, yelling, lying, head games, sexual withdrawal, jealousy ploys, pity plays, shit tests, hot/cold/hot/cold, disappearing acts, or guilt trips. She will rain and thunder all around you and you will shelter her until her storm passes. She will not drag you into her chaos or uproot you. When you have mastery over yourself, you will have mastery over her.

XVI.  Never be afraid to lose her

You must not fear. Fear is the love-killer. Fear is the ego-triumph that brings abject loneliness. You will face your fear. You will permit it to pass over and through you. And when your ego-fear is gone you will turn and face your lover, and only your heart will remain. You will walk away from her when she has violated your integrity, and you will let her walk when her heart is closed to you. She who can destroy you, controls you. Don’t give her that power over yourself. Love yourself before you love her.

Sounds to me like a big part of game just takes inner stability and a great sense of duty and other ideals to uphold. Something as little as the rewards of a relationship come second to your true goals, but part of the journey toward attaining/maintaining a healthy relationship could help give you that momentum to keep on going toward them.

Is anyone else here familiar with Game? Are there people here who are reviled by the idea of it, or see it as a godsend?

(I personally disagree with polyamory and commitment-free sex that all the PUA people seem to uphold because it defeats the constructive intent of an actual loving, committed relationship. their goals are physical pleasure, and to a certain degree, self-improvement to reach that very end -- ours are continuity and conservationism.)

[istaros]

There's no nobility in being celibate simply because you're lazy/repulsive/ass-pie In all things, it is better to have power than to not.

[Sammaellofi]

FAUST:  Rule 1: If she asks if you are religious, just say yes and move on.... trust me.

[Libido_Itch]

I have two friends that are really good with seducing woman.  They probably have had sex with over 30+ woman.  Its a certain personality they have, its a mixture of charisma and self-confidence. And it seems they are not the nicest guys in the world toward woman either.  I actually find it interesting how this works.  I worked one friend at a book store and he slept with 60 percent of the girls(good looking) that worked there because it was static, they would come and go.  The other friend mostly picks girls up from parties, work, and bars.

[Aulë]

This is going a little different direction but I have a question.  The articles on this site advocate against interracial dating/marriage/breeding but I have also learned that interracial relationships are actually genetically favorable because of an increase in variance of genes.  Which one is it?  Is it more beneficial to breed between the same race? (some say that this has greater chance of inbreeding and inheritance of recessive traits.)  It's kind of conflicting with it's own views and I'm just confused with my personal opinions and what is actually best.

[nous]

This is going a little different direction but I have a question.  The articles on this site advocate against interracial dating/marriage/breeding but I have also learned that interracial relationships are actually genetically favorable because of an increase in variance of genes.  Which one is it?  Is it more beneficial to breed between the same race? (some say that this has greater chance of inbreeding and inheritance of recessive traits.)  It's kind of conflicting with it's own views and I'm just confused with my personal opinions and what is actually best.

Since I'm no writer for this site, you're free to dismiss my opinion.

You are looking for an absolute where there is none.

What I would like to know, though, is: who or what should benefit? What are your opinions?

[NHA]

I have also learned that interracial relationships are actually genetically favorable because of an increase in variance of genes

Favorable to what extent?

Its pointless to use genetics in this type of argument. Mostly it just involves dipshits with a limited understanding of the topic trying to use it to justify their own morality.

[kontinual]

The articles on this site advocate against interracial dating/marriage/breeding

Please cite them.

[Aulë]

Quotes:  "While all humans can breed together, we are separated by thousands of generations of specialized evolution, which makes it a poor idea."

 "Because we have evolved differently, not only is race-mixing insane, but caste-mixing is insane"

"Thanks for writing a polite letter. I think you summarize the concept of why racial mixing is insane quite well; it's succinct and grasps the point. I see racial mixing as destructive in the same way that human environmental policy is, in that we replace natural diversity with a same, single-form-factor reality, whether that is concrete streets or a generic race of humans"

"For people who are already mixed, I suggest forming societies of similar mixes, and breeding those to a higher level."

Maybe I am taking these out of context.  But the point I'm trying to make is in America it is pushed upon people to accept interracial relationships and not discriminate, and that love is love etc.  Whether or not some people are for or against this, I am being taught these acts are now scientifically supported based on that it increases the variation of the genetic pool yielding advantages (such as an iimmunity to a disease).  Additionally, that people are actually more attracted to those with a very dissimilar genetic code (two different races)  b/c breeding with too much of an alike genes (and race) can lead to inbreeding and/or expression of normally repressed genes.  

So basically I just felt like I was being taught two different things.  I guess there is no clear cut answer accept an agreement with anus thought from a  cultural perspective.?

[kontinual]

Quotes:  "While all humans can breed together, we are separated by thousands of generations of specialized evolution, which makes it a poor idea."

 "Because we have evolved differently, not only is race-mixing insane, but caste-mixing is insane"

"Thanks for writing a polite letter. I think you summarize the concept of why racial mixing is insane quite well; it's succinct and grasps the point. I see racial mixing as destructive in the same way that human environmental policy is, in that we replace natural diversity with a same, single-form-factor reality, whether that is concrete streets or a generic race of humans"

"For people who are already mixed, I suggest forming societies of similar mixes, and breeding those to a higher level."

Thanks.  I searched for these and couldn't find them myself.  My first instinct with people referencing things "written on this site" is that they've misread them, which happens constantly in correspondence we receive, so it is always worth confirming.

Maybe I am taking these out of context.  But the point I'm trying to make is in America it is pushed upon people to accept interracial relationships and not discriminate, and that love is love etc.

My first thought is: why is there such a need to continually reinforce that one shouldn't discriminate in this manner, culturally?  Be wary of any claims of millennia-old paradigms being overturned by those who give no credence to genetic bases for them in the first place.

Whether or not some people are for or against this, I am being taught these acts are now scientifically supported based on that it increases the variation of the genetic pool yielding advantages (such as an iimmunity to a disease).

One can display either hybrid vigor or outbreeding depression.  The idea that one is guaranteed vigor in most cases is dubious; the logic that follows it -- that we should make every attempt to hybridize for the sake of finding vigor in any case -- is equally so.

Again with the poor logic of the common voice: if race/ethnicity is merely a superficial, social construct, the idea of hybrid vigor is absurd on the face of it.  If race/ethnicity is significant, then we have to pause and ask why that is so before addressing other concerns, like how to destroy them by promoting hybridization.

Additionally, that people are actually more attracted to those with a very dissimilar genetic code (two different races)  b/c breeding with too much of an alike genes (and race) can lead to inbreeding and/or expression of normally repressed genes.

This is the same phenomenon.  Population size in races or ethnicities is not nearly small enough in most cases for this to be an issue.

However, what could make us attracted (genetically) to our close relatives, and somehow able to bridge a genetic chasm and find those who are the most dissimilar attractive (sexually) at the same time?  What then of our feelings for the children of those unions?  How about the childrens' feelings for you and for their potential mates?

So basically I just felt like I was being taught two different things.  I guess there is no clear cut answer accept an agreement with anus thought from a  cultural perspective.?

Here's another scientific perspective.

[kontinual]

Taking tranny-Fenriz's post up there into consideration, I wonder how ANUSites feel about "Game" and that whole PUA deal.

An interesting article: The New Dating Game