The philosophy for Corrupt and other sites under the ANUS umbrella is that the words in an article are more important than the name attatched to the bottom of the page.
Absolutely, when the name attached is more important than the content, things go wrong.
However, it's understandable that people wants to know about the person behind the monitor, specially when there're so few good role models close to a young smart person.
Is this guy/girl someone who strives in daylight for what he/she writes in the internet, or it is just a grumpy armchair philosopher who grudgingly smiles at customers in a KFC? This question is totally emotional, but it happens, and at an emotional level, it matters.
If Corrupt.org wanna have "in real life" activity, is neccesary to face the fact that their potential voters want to know whom their trust their political opinion/power, to a real person or a to sentient robot with dissociative identity disorder.
That said, I was pricky towards Corrupt in the old days of the great ANUS schism, you know, the hairmetal days, but now it seems to me that they are doing a very good job again.