Liberal Logic's Greatest Shits

[JewishPhysics]

I thought it might be fun and informative to share various instances of Liberal Logic insanity.  Think of it like a sports blooper tape... only more retarded.

Here are two of my favorite examples:

Sherry Wolf gives a lecture on "Sexuality and Socialism"

Henry Louis Gates (yeah, him) examines whether or not Nobel Prize winner James Watson is a racist.

Feel free to give more examples, add analysis, make yo mama jokes, etc.

[scourge]

I have serious doubts that it is constructive to zero in on liberals and liberalism. Just as there are defectives of the far right, there are plenty of people who are good folks all around who are otherwise liberal. I also agree with them at the most basic level against needless mistreatment of people but this principle has been blown so far out of proportion that liberalism has turned into legislated, systematic abuse calling itself social justice.

When I read social justice, I understand the goal is most often a revolt against nature, a vain attempt to deny evolution, and a resistance to maturity in character; the pains of growing up and adapting to life.

"Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave."

While political activists on the other side of the spectrum have made similar observations, Rossiter boasts professional credentials and a life virtually free of activism and links to "the vast right-wing conspiracy."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56494

[JewishPhysics]

I have serious doubts that it is constructive to zero in on liberals and liberalism. Just as there are defectives of the far right, there are plenty of people who are good folks all around who are otherwise liberal. I also agree with them at the most basic level against needless mistreatment of people but this principle has been blown so far out of proportion that liberalism has turned into legislated, systematic abuse calling itself social justice.

The idea that people shouldn't be needlessly mistreated or oppressed is not an idea unique to liberalism, although it is most often associated with it.  In fact, currently libertarians and conservatives are the biggest advocates against tyranny.  The idea is also just common sense quite frankly.  How inefficient, ridiculous, and unnecessary is the idea of having the private lives of adults micro-managed by a government or analogous authority?

The biggest problem with liberalism is the culture (or anti-culture as some have called it) that it has produced.  It is the utter denial of any "uncomfortable" reality.  Sure, you can point to crazy people in all political camps.  But at least those other groups (usually) have some sort of internal logic.  Modern Liberalism is just pure nonsense, the total inversion of logic.

[scourge]

EDITORIAL: Angry, hateful, violent, extremist liberals http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/28/angry-hateful-violent-extremist-liberals/

No doubt members in Western Europe won't even blink at this article though.

[N0thing]

That first video is horrible, and could only watch the first 10 minutes or so.

Leftist is essentially a fight against nature and common sense.

[Umbrage]

I made it to 5:28 with the "lecture" on Sexuality and Socialism by Sherry Wolf. After that I couldn't follow her logic anymore and it saddens me that people like her actually still get crowds (that sort of thing should have ended with Jesus) Aye, extreme lefties want to make deviation the norm. World hunger and war are because of gender disassociation, too many people living in each others shit has nothing to do with it!

I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned yet: Life Of Brian. Great movie, I'm still waiting for the muslim version to come out (and it will) There's a brilliant scene which is still relevant in today's society, I think it says it all:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBOQzSk14c

Perhaps he can't have babies but we should still fight for his right to have babies! Makes perfect sense to me and I really have nothing better to do with my time. Hey, let's not forget to put the "social" in "socialism" by only focusing on special cases.

EDITORIAL: Angry, hateful, violent, extremist liberals http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/apr/28/angry-hateful-violent-extremist-liberals/

No doubt members in Western Europe won't even blink at this article though.

Nope. The UK is the most messed up country when it comes to immigration and integration though, this shit is not representative of the rest of Europe.

[reasonable]

I actually watched the entire video of that Marxist lesbian with the terrible haircut earlier. I learned absolutely nothing of value from that. Anybody who is still a dyed-in-the-wool Marxist is either (1) a humanities professor, (2) a fucking moron, or (3) all of the above. Everybody else has moved on, and for good reason.

[JewishPhysics]

I made it to 5:28 with the "lecture" on Sexuality and Socialism by Sherry Wolf. After that I couldn't follow her logic anymore

The olympics is divided by gender -> they believed a person competing in the women's division was a man -> they were correct -> that made the person sad -> ergo, we as a society must alter our entire understanding of gender to make sure somone's feelings don't get hurt

That's about what her logical chain of thought was.

[Umbrage]

I made it to 5:28 with the "lecture" on Sexuality and Socialism by Sherry Wolf. After that I couldn't follow her logic anymore

The olympics is divided by gender -> they believed a person competing in the women's division was a man -> they were correct -> that made the person sad -> ergo, we as a society must alter our entire understanding of gender to make sure somone's feelings don't get hurt

That's about what her logical chain of thought was.

Uh... I meant I couldn't follow it in the sense that her logic seemed flawed to me. I did understand what she was trying to say. But thanks for putting all this in perspective anyway.

[scourge]

Top Catholic heirarchy leaves the door open for world ethnonationalism:

It is therefore relevant that John Paul II noted in Dilecti Amici, addressing the youth of the world:

"In regard to this inheritance [of faith, culture, and national history] we cannot maintain a passive attitude, still less a defeatist one ... We must do everything we can to accept this spiritual inheritance, to confirm it, maintain it and increase it. This is an important task for all societies, especially perhaps for those that find themselves at the beginning of their independent existence, or for those that must defend from the danger of destruction from outside or of decay from within the very existence and essential identity of the particular nation."

It's obvious that such statements are relevant to issues relating to immigration, diversity, and inclusion, and they don't favor the liberal position. The Catholic view provides a useful background for realistic discussion of such issues, and its implications are not necessarily what they are thought to be.

http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/untimely-observations/inclusiveness-and-catholicism/

The entire article makes the conclusion a bit clearer.

[Antihuman]

Brown support here (well, sister school with overlapping campus/ cross-registration...).  Marxism and gender studies are favorite topics here, meaning, every class I take must examine the overlaps on these grounds.

Anyway, one of the things that is most annoying about the interview is Wolfe's "Tax the RIch" t-shirt.  Everyone justs wants to push responsibility onto everyone else.

Henry Louis Gates (yeah, him) examines whether or not Nobel Prize winner James Watson is a racist.

Recently had to read his "Talking Black" for a class I'm taking.  The whole time I was just wondering: why the hell was this anthologized?  Weak arguments, and an extreme loophole in his foundational case.  He basically argues for a return to a non-existent past, and a black infiltration of white-dominated theory through use of "peculiarly black ways of thinking and feeling".

So thats how you answer to "racism"?  Confirm stereotypes and see to it that new ones develop, without worrying about the actual thought involved?

[scourge]

this situation could trigger a pan-Western Civil War

[JewishPhysics]

Newest case of liberal insanity:  attempts to portray Constitutional Conservative tea party candidate Rand Paul as RACITS!!!!!  His crime?  He questioned elements of ONE of the 10 Titles of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which relates to private businesses and whether or not government should be allowed to enforce micromanagment policies (such as anti-discrimination) on them.

[scourge]

With the Westboro Baptist protest and the existence of an antipodal Landover Baptist troll group, another level of detail draws into focus.

While each are about as socially offensive as the other, they are both only adversarial insider, not paradigm shifting elements within a discordant equality composite system called liberal democracy.

A system of structured hierarchy finds itself in opposition to these two adversaries; the former as two-dimensional conservatives espousing largely secular values but with a God and Bible label and the latter virtually a parody in itself of radical secular humanism applying an extant parody of Christian conservatism.

Metal itself is more extreme, offensive and committed than either, but the first two aren't even metal's goals. They're side effects of being antihumanist and contra-modernist oppositional outsiders, the only genuine adversarial extremism within our liberal modern age.



(Edited and blogged, promote or critique at will: The Adversary)

[JewishPhysics]

I will agree to promote your blog, if you explain to me how the Westboro Baptist Church has secular values.