Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Weakling appeasers spread USA ass for world rape

ALLAHU AHKBAR

Quote
As many as 10,000 protesters from across the country including family members who lost loved ones on Sept. 11, 2001 took to the streets in New York City Sunday to fight construction of a 13-story Islamic mosque to be built just steps from Ground Zero where Muslim terrorists murdered 2,751 people in the name of Allah.

Now the organizers plan to sue the federal government to designate the site as a war memorial.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=163593

Its pretty fucked up that not even 10 years later, they are planning on building a Mosque at the sight of an Islamic terrorist act.

This is how Islam works, they built a Mosque signifying victory.

It appears we are too weak to fight Islam.

Barry Soetoro is Muslim...


Its pretty fucked up that not even 10 years later, they are planning on building a Mosque at the sight of an Islamic terrorist act.

If the Islamic folks had any brains to rub together, they'd avoid this needlessly provocative act.

But like Christians, they adore their passive aggression... it's the only way they can wage war.

Reminds me of men who can only fuck with condoms on, and only after a "deep" conversation. (Exceptions made for those of you in Texas: sheep hate Foucault.)


If building a mosque near the site of the 9/11 remains is passive aggressive, what could possibly be an active aggressive way to wage war?

Did you become a moderator recently?

"If the critical date for Americans in the new century is September 11, 2001, for
Continentals it's a day two and a half years later, in March 2004. On the eleventh of the
month, just before Spain's general election, a series of train bombings in Madrid killed more
than two hundred people. That day, I received a ton' of e-mails from American
acquaintances along the lines of: "3/11 is Europe's 9/11. Even the French will be in."
Friends told me: "The Europeans get it now." Doughty warriors of the blogosphere posted
the Spanish flag on their home pages in solidarity with America's loyal allies in the war
against terrorism. John Ellis, a Bush cousin and a savvy guy with a smart website, declared,
"Every memberstate of the EU understands that Madrid is Rome is Berlin is Amsterdam is
Paris is London is New York."
All wrong. On Friday, March 12, hundreds of thousands of Spaniards filled Madrid's
streets and stood somberly in a bleak drizzle to mourn their dead. On Sunday, election day,
the voters tossed out Jose Marla Aznar's sadly misnamed Popular Party and handed the
government to the Socialist Workers' Party. Aznar's party was America's principal
Continental ally in Iraq; the Socialist Workers campaigned on a pledge to withdraw Spain's
troops from Iraq. Throughout the campaign, polls showed the Popular Party cruising to
victory. Then came the bomb.
Having invited people to choose between a strong horse and a weak horse, even Osama
bin Laden might have been surprised to see the Spanish opt to make their general election an
exercise in mass self-gelding. Within seventy-two hours of the carnage, voters sent a tough
message to the terrorists: "We apologize for catching your eye." "

- Mark Steyn

Reminds me of men who can only fuck with condoms on

Would you rather risk AIDS?

If building a mosque near the site of the 9/11 remains is passive aggressive, what could possibly be an active aggressive way to wage war?

Did you become a moderator recently?

"If the critical date for Americans in the new century is September 11, 2001, for
Continentals it's a day two and a half years later, in March 2004. On the eleventh of the
month, just before Spain's general election, a series of train bombings in Madrid killed more
than two hundred people. That day, I received a ton' of e-mails from American
acquaintances along the lines of: "3/11 is Europe's 9/11. Even the French will be in."
Friends told me: "The Europeans get it now." Doughty warriors of the blogosphere posted
the Spanish flag on their home pages in solidarity with America's loyal allies in the war
against terrorism. John Ellis, a Bush cousin and a savvy guy with a smart website, declared,
"Every memberstate of the EU understands that Madrid is Rome is Berlin is Amsterdam is
Paris is London is New York."
All wrong. On Friday, March 12, hundreds of thousands of Spaniards filled Madrid's
streets and stood somberly in a bleak drizzle to mourn their dead. On Sunday, election day,
the voters tossed out Jose Marla Aznar's sadly misnamed Popular Party and handed the
government to the Socialist Workers' Party. Aznar's party was America's principal
Continental ally in Iraq; the Socialist Workers campaigned on a pledge to withdraw Spain's
troops from Iraq. Throughout the campaign, polls showed the Popular Party cruising to
victory. Then came the bomb.
Having invited people to choose between a strong horse and a weak horse, even Osama
bin Laden might have been surprised to see the Spanish opt to make their general election an
exercise in mass self-gelding. Within seventy-two hours of the carnage, voters sent a tough
message to the terrorists: "We apologize for catching your eye." "

- Mark Steyn


So, you came here to quote a Neocon tool likeSteyn. What goes on around here anymore?

If building a mosque near the site of the 9/11 remains is passive aggressive, what could possibly be an active aggressive way to wage war?

Did you become a moderator recently?

Yes, recent promotion around here. Still not sure I like it but it lets me clean up some disasters, which I promise not to abuse.

An active aggressive way to wage war -- fly planes into twin towers.

Quote
Having invited people to choose between a strong horse and a weak horse, even Osama
bin Laden might have been surprised to see the Spanish opt to make their general election an
exercise in mass self-gelding. Within seventy-two hours of the carnage, voters sent a tough
message to the terrorists: "We apologize for catching your eye." "

- Mark Steyn

This is the problem with Europeans/Americans in general: drenched in guilt and unwilling, as a result, to act in their own interests.

It's the same thing that happens when smart kids from the Gifted and Talented Program are mixed with the regular kids. They defer to the simpler, less self-questioning, more violent and more primitive normal IQ students.

Let's look at a few things:

The Twin Towers were symbolic of a flawed value system- two monstrous sanctuaries of commerce spiring toward the heavens.  I forget who it was that first noted this, but where once the churches were the tallest buildings, our skyscrapers full of offices hold that position.

I don't know that 9-11 brought this fully to the popular mind, but I would say it got a lot of people (in my generation at least- I was 12 when it happened) to ask some important basic questions.

I realize my former post here was not very articulate (thanks for moving that here; I had not seen this topic), but I am curious as to what would happen were this thing destroyed immediately after its construction (not by a Christian extermist group mind you).  It would cost those behind it millions for one thing, and it would piss off a lot of people.  But it is clear that we are being infiltrated by people who want to conquer our land, albeit in a more subversive way than we usually think. 

Christianity is not the answer, but violence may be.

The Twin Towers were symbolic of a flawed value system- two monstrous sanctuaries of commerce spiring toward the heavens.

Is that why they were chosen as targets? I always thought it was because they were easy to ht.

So, you came here to quote a Neocon tool likeSteyn. What goes on around here anymore?

I think there is great similarity between Steyn and anus.com. In a video you can watch of him on YT, he calls multiculturalism a "denial of reality", a phrase I have only seen used with substance and meaning here. I don't know what you mean by tool. I wouldn't publicly denounce Islam unless I were given a 7 figure annual paycheck and a small island in the Philippines.

If building a mosque near the site of the 9/11 remains is passive aggressive, what could possibly be an active aggressive way to wage war?

Did you become a moderator recently?

Yes, recent promotion around here. Still not sure I like it but it lets me clean up some disasters, which I promise not to abuse.

An active aggressive way to wage war -- fly planes into twin towers.


Cool. Its nice to see some upward mobility in this forum. And I'll shine my shoes.

Islam couldn't wage a conventional war against the West, even if it centralized, because the U.S. would crush it. But that's not really what we are talking about. It seems to be doing all it can in the way of aggression- a few towers cleverly destroyed to start, a few bombs on buses in London, bombs in Madrid, riots and disturbances in every country that allows Muslim immigration- and is too politically correct to attribute them to Islam(Cronulla, Sydney Australia; Clichy-sous-Bois, Paris). But really, I think the mosques are the active component, actually, and the bombings and riots are just the effects.

I thought about something interesting the other day, in relation to this. The Islam vs the West/Islam vs the World thing is kind of like the geopolitical opposite of the Vietnam War- The U.S. still has the military brawn, but the guerrillas and insurgents(Islam) are the belligerents this time. Islam is not indoctrinating in the West at the terrifying speed it is in Europe, however, so what is happening right now is only the beginnings of that war, shall it will unfold.

9/11 had nothing to do with religion; The attack was purely political.

Religion, in this case, is simply used by both parties (US and terrorist groups) to manupulate the general public and make them believe that what they are doing serves a higher cosmic purpose.

Terrorism/Islam are the new McCarthyisms. They are fabricated ideas that serve to scare the public and make them supportive of millitary action.

I absolutely believe that if the US government did not orchestrate 9/11 themselves, they intentionally neglected to stop it. Any government funded memorial on the 9/11 site would be just as much of an insult-to-injury as a mosque would be.

The current US government is the epitomy of a 'nihilistic' leader by the standards proposed on anus.com.

Let's look at a few things:

The Twin Towers were symbolic of a flawed value system- two monstrous sanctuaries of commerce spiring toward the heavens.  I forget who it was that first noted this, but where once the churches were the tallest buildings, our skyscrapers full of offices hold that position.
I believe that was Joseph Campbell.