Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Why not genocide

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 06:07:02 PM
All races of humanity would appear very unintelligent when you reduce them to their lowest common denominator, including Europeans. Europeans however have produced disproportionate amounts of genius. I never said we should neglect eugenics for our own race. Trust me, if it were up to me no group would face as much scrutiny as Europeans of poor character, low IQ etc. because these people are in many ways a greater danger to European man than other races.

And Deadite, that was incredibly rude of you to put words in my mouth like that. I am not special and never even mentioned myself and I'm not entirely European hence why I refer to them in the third person.

I didn't direct the statement towards you specifically, I was using the word "you" in generalities.

Apologies if any offense was incurred. I have to remember tone of voice is not available when communicating in text over the interweb.
No.

Having reviewed the thread, baby Jesus is most definitely weeping at this point.

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 06:24:23 PM
It maybe a bit fallacious to assume the white race is the best race. Certainly from our own perspective it is, and that is all that matters in the end, but maybe human kind 100,000 years down the line would be better served by leaving the best of every race and culture to grow and develop, giving our evolution more "looks".

Everyone has their own utopian fantasy, and mind is a network of trade and communication that doesn't involve cultural or ethnic dilution between the races of the world, where the average IQ of the entire population is above 120, and every tribe acknowledges every other tribe's right to exist, and every tribe acknowledges it's own right to exist. War would be less of a necessity because the human population would be well under a billion, leaving resources and space plentiful. The burden on the planet would be significantly lessened, and the biosphere would be able to return to "normal".

A planet that truly respects diversity. Our society pretends to respect diversity, when all it really wants to do is destroy it by mixing every flavor at once, and holding no standards.

Who the fuck wants to go to a Baskin Robbins where all 31 flavors are mixed together at random?
Lettin' nillas know.

I hope our aryan overlords will emerge form their l secret base below antartica and wipe all of those under 500 of IQ And don't have the ability to mindtravel into the Xerces Galaxy.

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 06:32:31 PM
Now it has already changed to: "We want to preserve and embetter ourselves and maybe wipe out the more fucked up tribes..." and "sure we can't think like that now because we degenerated, but who knows maybe in the future we can think about expanding and conquering for more land..."

Where has it changed again?

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 09:15:03 PM
Well I'm glad I didn't fall for that "Oh no we don't agree with trying to conquer more land for europeans we just want self determination and that's all", since I already asked that question before, I asked the exact same thing that people are saying here: Won't this race preservation ultimately lead to a desire to conquer more land for europeans? The answer was no, even cargést said that, he and Conservationist.

(PS: I know how stupid it sounds to talk about this since it is pure speculation and fantasy for the future, but we are talking about the ideas and intentions on people's minds).

Now it has already changed to: "We want to preserve and embetter ourselves and maybe wipe out the more fucked up tribes..." and "sure we can't think like that now because we degenerated, but who knows maybe in the future we can think about expanding and conquering for more land..."

Well, I guess I know now why there is a plot to weaken the race consciousness among white people. It's for the best for the rest of the races. The superiority complex is still there. Well, europeans haven't been superior for a long time, things change... I think the asians are the better ones now.

Anyway it's good to read that since now I think one of the most important things for latin american countries is to start building atomic bombs.

The jews would probably be allied with the whites so now I support Iran.


That's probably the most ridiculous interpretation of pan-nationalism I have ever heard. Your intelligence must be roughly about the level of your grammar.
Classicism in art, royalism in politics, Catholicism in religion

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 09:30:41 PM
Pel is a bit rough around the edges but he's sort of on the right track here. I think he might be early in his development. Instead of just calling him stupid, help the kid along. I don't call my son a retard when he leaves a little soap on the dishes.
Lettin' nillas know.

I hope our aryan overlords will emerge form their l secret base below antartica and wipe all of those under 500 of IQ And don't have the ability to mindtravel into the Xerces Galaxy.

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 09:49:53 PM
Pel is a bit rough around the edges but he's sort of on the right track here. I think he might be early in his development. Instead of just calling him stupid, help the kid along. I don't call my son a retard when he leaves a little soap on the dishes.

In what manner is targeting European races as a threat to all other races "on the right track"? Disregarding context is a hallmark of stupidity, and Bel is completely disregarding the context that bad thinking is what causes people to fall, not some magical, evil, fat, rich, white fairy-demon from the land of Oppresspeopleforthefunofit.
Classicism in art, royalism in politics, Catholicism in religion

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 09:55:43 PM
While what he said wasn't clear, I didn't get that from the comments you quoted.
Lettin' nillas know.

I hope our aryan overlords will emerge form their l secret base below antartica and wipe all of those under 500 of IQ And don't have the ability to mindtravel into the Xerces Galaxy.

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 10:03:35 PM
"To me "pan"-nationalism is similar to individualism, except we replace individuals with nations. Not all nations are equal nor do all nations (or any nation for that matter) have a right to exist."


Ya maybe, but we should perhaps let them rise and fall on their own. Don't get wrapped up in similarities to individualism as a dirty word. Unless they are a threat to us, or to their own environment thereby being a threat to us long term by rendering significant damage to the environment, let them choose what course is best for them. If they fail, they fail. Live and let live.

Africans may be a step behind in an evolutionary sense, but at least Africa still has its megafauna.

Hessian = hippie?
Lettin' nillas know.

I hope our aryan overlords will emerge form their l secret base below antartica and wipe all of those under 500 of IQ And don't have the ability to mindtravel into the Xerces Galaxy.

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 10:20:00 PM
Now it has already changed to: "We want to preserve and embetter ourselves and maybe wipe out the more fucked up tribes..." and "sure we can't think like that now because we degenerated, but who knows maybe in the future we can think about expanding and conquering for more land..."

Where has it changed again?

I just read an interview on extremepolitics.org with a National Socialist who favors total extermination of all the races but caucasian. I want honesty: Does the organization support this kind of thinking? I know it doesn't right now (publicly) - but I don't feel it's too unreal that some day, out of nowhere, the organizations starts agreeing with the guy (or probably already agrees but doens't feel it's the time to say it yet) and feeling it is more realist that the caucasians will want to expand to other areas of the earth to conquer and reign.

We do not support this kind of thinking. We are Pan-Nationalists who believe in ethnic self-determination for every ethnic group. Further, we don't want to rule the world; we do want to bring it back from the point of decay into chaos, and that will require temporary totalitarian rule of enough of the earth to enact economic forces that achieve our desired results.

--

Same question:

Conservationist: That's an interview with a non-ANUS member, correct? Why would we agree with that? I think Cargest has a good point, which is that it would be a violation of conservation. However, exterminating all individuals who are stupid would not be, and in fact might be required to bring societies like Brazil (English spelling) back to health.


--

Erosion: How malicious of me to think expansion of europeans to conquer territory might be a threat to other races.

Wolfgang: Thanks.
You're quite hostile.

I got a right to be hostile, man, my people been persecuted!

Re: Why not genocide
September 17, 2010, 11:41:19 PM
favors total extermination of all the races but caucasian

ANUS will never support that idea.

We support separation of the races, and we recognize that killing all under-120s will bring a harder burden on some races than others.

However, we support future human evolution. Death to the stupid, in with the good.

We do support keeping as much land open as possible for nature. Wiping out 7 billion people and leaving 200m smart ones is a means to that end.

Re: Why not genocide
September 18, 2010, 01:45:26 AM
Quote
Being wrongfully accused of something you did not do is a frustrating experience. Whether it is your spouse accusing you of having an affair or being accused of doing something criminal and illegal, there are steps that you can take to help you deal with the situation in a proper manner.

http://www.ehow.com/how_2168917_handle-being-wrongfully-accused.html

Look at the first sentence. The goal of the accuser, not just the side effects,  is to frustrate you, not to clarify any point of confusion. There is nothing confusing in any of the content. All the content written is intact and appealing when presented as is to newcomers, but for one problem. A few people have an irrational sense of antipathy toward the tough love approach. Maybe as malcontent aberrations, they were exceedingly willful children who plagued their unfortunate but well adjusted parents.

The best thing is to respond briefly and move on from them for good. They are unimportant, a waste of time, and the gallery as a whole will forget them as such.

”The Revolution ends by devouring its own children” – Jacques Mallet du Pan, 1793

Re: Why not genocide
September 18, 2010, 02:27:21 AM
Hessian = hippie?

Or how about: Hessian = realist, even if the realistic solution happens to resemble non-realistic solutions.

Re: Why not genocide
September 18, 2010, 03:06:27 AM
Quote
I just read an interview on extremepolitics.org with a National Socialist who favors total extermination of all the races but caucasian. I want honesty: Does the organization support this kind of thinking? I know it doesn't right now (publicly) - but I don't feel it's too unreal that some day, out of nowhere, the organizations starts agreeing with the guy (or probably already agrees but doens't feel it's the time to say it yet) and feeling it is more realist that the caucasians will want to expand to other areas of the earth to conquer and reign.

This is desperation. You WANT the organization to agree with these views so you can play the old "Who cried racist?" game. This isn't they daycare center, and we're not here to find a way to paint a red target on each others backs so the other kids can come running in and haze the bully who pissed us off for not thinking our propeller-hat is cool.

And.

Quote

Erosion: How malicious of me to think expansion of europeans to conquer territory might be a threat to other races.


You must be an absolute moron when it comes to history, because the Moors, Aztecs, and yes, even the holy, divine, and never have done anything wrong ever Africans have subjugated people they thought were weaker than them. In the case of the African people, they enslaved each other (but...but... I thought they were perfect and that not a single black person has ever done anything wrong in the history of the human race!). Caucasian people are no more a threat to humanity than humanity is a threat to itself, and that is the way it always has been. The only reason you want to focus on Caucasians is because it allows you an excuse not to better yourself. Instead of working to become a powerful race, why not just kill whitey instead? This is the basic idea behind all revolutions, and look where the revolution in France and America got us.
Classicism in art, royalism in politics, Catholicism in religion

Re: Why not genocide
September 18, 2010, 03:39:15 AM
Genocide is stupid, period. End the power of the elite, and start educating people then you get somewhere...

Re: Why not genocide
September 18, 2010, 03:57:12 AM
-