100% Metal Forum (Death Metal and Black Metal)

Metal => Interzone => Topic started by: Septicemia on October 23, 2007, 10:17:23 AM

Title: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Septicemia on October 23, 2007, 10:17:23 AM
I've Encountered these:

www.anus.com/metal/creepmime

www.anus.com/metal/metallica

www.anus.com/metal/red_tide

Anymore?
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Vajra on October 23, 2007, 12:07:43 PM
http://www.anus.com/metal/blackgoat.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/christagony.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/conqueror.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/hetsheads.html
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Agni on October 25, 2007, 04:31:04 AM
http://www.anus.com/metal/nargaroth/
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: -H418ov21.C on October 25, 2007, 05:54:59 AM
What's planned to do with these ?
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: buckets_of_rain on October 25, 2007, 06:23:42 AM
Well the Metallica one was always sort of a hidden kind of a thing, but I am confused by what these other bands are doing here.  Maybe they were forgotten by mistake and not added to the rest of the list?  I doubt it.  Any ideas?
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Agni on October 25, 2007, 06:50:30 AM
I think these bands (I'm sure about Nargaroth) were listed at some point of time but were removed.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Necrolust on October 25, 2007, 07:33:08 AM
Quote
http://www.anus.com/metal/blackgoat.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/christagony.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/conqueror.html
http://www.anus.com/metal/hetsheads.html


All of these bands, with the exception of Christ Agony, are listed on the pages of their respective subgenre.

I know there are quite a bit more, but I've forgotten most of them. Zyklon was one, I think.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: KIRK JOHNSON on October 25, 2007, 08:08:55 AM
Nargaroth?  ::)
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: o.d.i.r. on October 25, 2007, 08:53:59 AM
Indeed quite a find to see Nargaroth having been reviewed -- and positively at that...
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Mithrandir on October 25, 2007, 09:02:41 AM
Interesting that it was removed after the less than positive reactions on the forum. But I never cared much for his music.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: NEVR4GETLOL on October 25, 2007, 09:23:36 AM
I had one of his albums after seeing the praise on DLA (likening them to Burzum even!) and it was terrible. BLACK FUCKING METTAL! BLUUURRGHHH...
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Septicemia on October 25, 2007, 09:57:32 AM
Quote
What's planned to do with these ?


Nothing, I hope (hence it's Chasm placement). I was just interested in what other albums have been "removed" from the DLA; I had heard that Red Tide album, and was fairly surprised that it was ever reviewed here.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: kontinual on October 25, 2007, 11:52:36 AM
Quote
Interesting that it was removed after the less than positive reactions on the forum. But I never cared much for his music.


Where do you get the idea that this is true?
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Mithrandir on October 25, 2007, 04:21:51 PM
Quote

Where do you get the idea that this is true?


I made a statement from my viewpoint, because I remember when the reviews were up on the front page, but there was some dissing of the band on the forums sometime later, and I haven't seen it on the front page since.  I didn't say it was "true," I said it was an interesting observation.

Quote

Nothing, I hope (hence it's Chasm placement). I was just interested in what other albums have been "removed" from the DLA; I had heard that Red Tide album, and was fairly surprised that it was ever reviewed here.


Sortof proves my point.  I wish some of the administration would get over their self-importance and rhetorical questions and just say something direct if they have to say it.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: born for banning on October 25, 2007, 04:42:34 PM
Quote
I wish some of the administration would get over their self-importance and rhetorical questions and just say something direct if they have to say it.


What's your beef, specifically? My question is why the admins even bother, given the huge amount of ignorance on forums and how embittered and resentful everyone turns out to be, always posing for superiority or nobility, until you find out they really don't care at all and are just looking for a way to pass the time until they croak.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: kontinual on October 25, 2007, 04:52:02 PM
Quote

I made a statement from my viewpoint, because I remember when the reviews were up on the front page, but there was some dissing of the band on the forums sometime later, and I haven't seen it on the front page since.  I didn't say it was "true," I said it was an interesting observation.


You said it was removed "after less than positive reactions from the forum," for which there is no evidence.  I'm hardly asking rhetorical questions by looking for support for your random suppositions.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Mithrandir on October 25, 2007, 05:46:18 PM
Quote

What's your beef, specifically? My question is why the admins even bother, given the huge amount of ignorance on forums and how embittered and resentful everyone turns out to be, always posing for superiority or nobility, until you find out they really don't care at all and are just looking for a way to pass the time until they croak.



::) I'm not going to bother addressing the rest of your post because you really don't know anything about the people you always accuse of this or what they've achieved (probably a hell of a lot more than you). But you're really good at describing yourself, I must hand you that :) And you do make a good SRP-wannabe. That's about all I can think you've achieved, whoopee, now you can croak happy.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: born for banning on October 25, 2007, 06:28:09 PM
Quote


 ::) I'm not going to bother addressing the rest of your post because you really don't know anything about the people you always accuse of this or what they've achieved (probably a hell of a lot more than you). But you're really good at describing yourself, I must hand you that :) And you do make a good SRP-wannabe. That's about all I can think you've achieved, whoopee, now you can croak happy.


Look, I don't care what you think about me, but if you have useful information for this organization, spill the beans. I spend hours of my life every day working for this because I believe in it and unlike most people, I realize that it's better to be active than to just accept the failure of this society like a rapist dick in the ass. So spill the beans. You can call me a cunt all you like, but if you have useful knowledge, don't hold out on us............
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: on October 25, 2007, 10:53:46 PM
Question on Nargaroth:
When was the review written, and at what point were staff first aware of this band? Seems that "Kanwulf" took some not inconsiderable liberties with the accuracy of his band's history.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: shadowmystic on October 25, 2007, 10:58:58 PM
Why should it matter, they obviously considered the music worthy at least.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: on October 25, 2007, 11:20:29 PM
Yeah, good post that. Any adults in here?

I don't care in the least about shock-horror the infallibility of the anus canon (lol anus cannon). I am more interested in finding out about the falsified past of the band Nargaroth.

It's obvious that most of the history is bullshit (such as recording demos retrospectively, creating ridiculous "legends" in interviews, etc), but what I am interested in is this: That infamous talkshow appearance was in 1999; No-one seems to recall hearing about the band before this date. Can this reviewer?

Obviously 90% of the band's history is fabricated (ref. if you need any proof whatsoever: http://nargaroth.shaddai.name/en/), but how much of the last 10% is also I do not know.

Simple request, if it is inappropriate then let me know and i'll pick a side in this exciting war-of-the-trolls.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: shadowmystic on October 25, 2007, 11:55:02 PM
So Kanwulf is full of shit, tbh, so is Varg these days, I haven't heard Nargaroth (avoided them cause of all the hate) so I can't comment on the quality of their music but if it is good I don't see why the credibility of the maker should matter.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: kontinual on October 26, 2007, 01:05:23 AM
I found this (http://www.anus.com/metal/about/whatsnew.html)


Quote
New Death/Black Metal Reviews

Nov[emb]er 31, 2001
Nargaroth - Herbestleyd

March 25, 2001
Nargaroth - Amarok


No idea about the other specifics.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: born for banning on October 27, 2007, 06:23:18 AM
Nargaroth isn't terrible, but when it became clear the guy was a poser in 2003, I sold my Nargaroth CDs. It's not difficult to find Burzum clones. Still, "Herbestlied" is a solid album.

But some of those other bands are just dogshit.
Title: Re: DLA: Lost/Removed Reviews
Post by: Agni on October 29, 2007, 05:29:36 AM
I was impressed when I listened to "Amarok" but "BM ist krieg" turned out to be a rock n roll fantasy album(except maybe 2 songs) . Nargaroth has been obsolete since then.