Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
31
Chasm / Neanderthals and our extra-terrestrial origins
« on: January 31, 2012, 12:53:54 AM »
I came across this article many days ago by geologist Rober M. Schoch about the work of Stan Gooch, basically what he says is that the neanderthals were a intuitive, magical culture of dreams and that cro-magnons were more rational and male-oriented, and that they mixed (apparently the guy said that before it was proved that we have neanderthal dna), causing a very divided psychology in humans:
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/stan-gooch-the-neanderthal-legacy
Now I read this interesting interview with Varg:
When I was reading your website, I was fascinated by the teenage games/fights you had in forest, with clubs, spears etc. It seemed like you longed for the past, of nobler time perhaps, where people fought battles to defend their beloved lands. Please tell me more about this longing.
My brilliant wife has studied this subject for some time, and has found many very interesting answers. Apparently the longing is very European, and she thinks we have this longing because we were better in the past. The flawed theory of evolution tells us differently, of course, but if you look at the first art known from the Chauvet cave in France some 35.000 years old, it was exceptional compared to the art of f. ex. the early middle ages. The older the art we find is, the better it is.
Before Chauvet they didn't even need art, because their minds were so superior. They didn't need to record the beauty of our world; they managed to process all impressions properly just by looking at it. They could f. ex. like a modern day autistic savant just take a look at the sky and memorize the positions of all the stars.
We long for this time, because we still have this fantastic neanderthal DNA in us (seen today as blonde hair, blue or gray eyes and white skin), and just like you can feel phantom pains in a lost finger, we feel phantom pains in our severed minds, that were broken by the mixing of homo sapiens and homo neanderthalensis beginning perhaps some 40.000 years ago. This despair causes us to produce art and to do weird things, in an attempt to artificially create the harmony that we no longer are able to experience.
Alas! All that has been lost due to race mixing... and we keep doing it, digging our own grave in the process.
Also, from another lost, forgotten, sad interview:
Writers like Tolkien actually never "made up" anything, they just wrote stories based on memories from the past (memories from the blood)! Not necessarily from our world, our planet, but from the last planet we lived on (in the system of Sirius), when we were Gods.
http://www.newdawnmagazine.com/articles/stan-gooch-the-neanderthal-legacy
Quote
Looks a little like that funny monk Salvatore on the film The Name Of The Rose. He was very intuitive too.
Now I read this interesting interview with Varg:
When I was reading your website, I was fascinated by the teenage games/fights you had in forest, with clubs, spears etc. It seemed like you longed for the past, of nobler time perhaps, where people fought battles to defend their beloved lands. Please tell me more about this longing.
My brilliant wife has studied this subject for some time, and has found many very interesting answers. Apparently the longing is very European, and she thinks we have this longing because we were better in the past. The flawed theory of evolution tells us differently, of course, but if you look at the first art known from the Chauvet cave in France some 35.000 years old, it was exceptional compared to the art of f. ex. the early middle ages. The older the art we find is, the better it is.
Before Chauvet they didn't even need art, because their minds were so superior. They didn't need to record the beauty of our world; they managed to process all impressions properly just by looking at it. They could f. ex. like a modern day autistic savant just take a look at the sky and memorize the positions of all the stars.
We long for this time, because we still have this fantastic neanderthal DNA in us (seen today as blonde hair, blue or gray eyes and white skin), and just like you can feel phantom pains in a lost finger, we feel phantom pains in our severed minds, that were broken by the mixing of homo sapiens and homo neanderthalensis beginning perhaps some 40.000 years ago. This despair causes us to produce art and to do weird things, in an attempt to artificially create the harmony that we no longer are able to experience.
Alas! All that has been lost due to race mixing... and we keep doing it, digging our own grave in the process.
Also, from another lost, forgotten, sad interview:
Writers like Tolkien actually never "made up" anything, they just wrote stories based on memories from the past (memories from the blood)! Not necessarily from our world, our planet, but from the last planet we lived on (in the system of Sirius), when we were Gods.
32
Chasm / Charles Manson: Innocent?
« on: January 30, 2012, 10:57:45 PM »
Writer and practicioner of "left-hand path" or "sinister way" Nikolas Shcreck wrote a book years ago called the Manson File with some facts trying to prove Manson was not what the media made him out to be and that the Helter Skelter story was a total myth.
Now very recently he released an uptaded version of the book, the Apocalypse Edition, with over 900 pages with new facts.
You can read interviews with him about Manson on his website: http://nikolasschreck.eu . There are some other interesting interviews there too. I always thought Manson had ordered the murder of a pregnant woman - I think I was wrong.
(I never say maybe - things happened one way only. You can't say "maybe it happened this way, maybe it didn't)
Now very recently he released an uptaded version of the book, the Apocalypse Edition, with over 900 pages with new facts.
You can read interviews with him about Manson on his website: http://nikolasschreck.eu . There are some other interesting interviews there too. I always thought Manson had ordered the murder of a pregnant woman - I think I was wrong.
(I never say maybe - things happened one way only. You can't say "maybe it happened this way, maybe it didn't)
33
Chasm / Why deconstruct evil?
« on: January 22, 2012, 06:24:29 PM »
Why deconstruct evil?
If you are unhappy with the word evil, why don't you take the next step and deconstruct the word "chair", or something?
What's the point? Only evil deserves to be deconstructed because only children adhere to concepts of good and evil?
If someone comes and say "I think the concept of degenerate sex should be re-evalued... It should not address inserting banana up my male ass while I sodomize a dog. That's christian morality"
What I mean is there is some interest behind the deconstruction.
I go so far as to state that the struggle between good and evil defines our whole human existence.
The only difference is not that good and evil does not exist for some, there are two things:
1. The conceptions of good and evil change from person to person or group
2. Some people alternate between different models of good and evil, in fact all do (for example, in times of great pressure it can change) but the psychopatic do not have a standart good/evil model, but they always do have one (hardly you will see a psychopath accepting to be maimed - that would be evil for him? Unless he/she gets sexually aroused or something - in that case the excitement would be good).
The only people who trasncend that shit are the ones who transcended a lot more. I mean, why should the person who transcended good & evil be the one torturing innocents? Does that mean he has transcended?
Good and evil may not exist... but im from the path where to transcend that, you get first knee-deep in the good and evil shit until you bypass it.... and then there's death.
If you are unhappy with the word evil, why don't you take the next step and deconstruct the word "chair", or something?
What's the point? Only evil deserves to be deconstructed because only children adhere to concepts of good and evil?
If someone comes and say "I think the concept of degenerate sex should be re-evalued... It should not address inserting banana up my male ass while I sodomize a dog. That's christian morality"
What I mean is there is some interest behind the deconstruction.
I go so far as to state that the struggle between good and evil defines our whole human existence.
The only difference is not that good and evil does not exist for some, there are two things:
1. The conceptions of good and evil change from person to person or group
2. Some people alternate between different models of good and evil, in fact all do (for example, in times of great pressure it can change) but the psychopatic do not have a standart good/evil model, but they always do have one (hardly you will see a psychopath accepting to be maimed - that would be evil for him? Unless he/she gets sexually aroused or something - in that case the excitement would be good).
The only people who trasncend that shit are the ones who transcended a lot more. I mean, why should the person who transcended good & evil be the one torturing innocents? Does that mean he has transcended?
Good and evil may not exist... but im from the path where to transcend that, you get first knee-deep in the good and evil shit until you bypass it.... and then there's death.
34
Chasm / Anti-Dualism
« on: January 03, 2012, 09:50:37 PM »
First of all I admit not knowing exactly what I'm talking about but I'm talking about what I could pick up.
One of the biggest contributions this site did to me was the no-dualism or no supernatural-bullshit. That does not mean I do not believe in the paranormal - it means I don't believe in happy flying poneys that make all OK (that make all OK - not that I don't believe in happy shiny poneys - they may exist in the astral world).
I admit I have a tendency to phantasize, to imagine too much and to dream - that is weakness of a kind sometimes.
The dualism I accept is that I think, probably, and I don't believe in probably - people get too much caught in opinions like "maybe and probably" and sometimes do not realize there is no such thing as maybe - either something is true or is not true. Well, the dualism I think is probably true is that there is a non-physical (that is - non explainable with the current physics) part of existence of the mind that has been called by some the Akashic Field.
But ANUS always said: If there is some other world or realm or whatever, it operates in relation to this one. That does not necessairily mean that this that you are perceiving now is "the highest", but it means that fantasy is where it belongs: In the realm of the unreal. That does not mean that somethings that are considered phantasy can not be real. It means that we have to ACCEPT reality - Reality - What Happens.
What I got from this non-dualism is this: Not of your bullshit is real. None of your ego-phantasiez. None of your shit. The fact that there is a brutal physical reality does not undermime your spirituality: It just makes it brutal.
People get BLIND all the time. That is fucked up. That is, tough, only bad if you have attachment, because if you were an extreme buddhist you would not attach yourself to vision. That is, all of our problems are created by ourselves - not really that we decided it, but by our stubbornes (born stubborn) we created it - by our sttuborn ways of believing what our parents told us - if you believe you're entitled to vision, you will work out and be a God - 99,09% of the time - the other 0,01% are gonna have to deal with blindness - but then, you always have the astral or dream world, where you don't necessairliry need your vision - or do you? But it's hard to adapt - attachment.
The only thing I have not figured out is extreme torture - can that be solved with some sort of non-attachment - or - is - the- world just wicked?
One of the biggest contributions this site did to me was the no-dualism or no supernatural-bullshit. That does not mean I do not believe in the paranormal - it means I don't believe in happy flying poneys that make all OK (that make all OK - not that I don't believe in happy shiny poneys - they may exist in the astral world).
I admit I have a tendency to phantasize, to imagine too much and to dream - that is weakness of a kind sometimes.
The dualism I accept is that I think, probably, and I don't believe in probably - people get too much caught in opinions like "maybe and probably" and sometimes do not realize there is no such thing as maybe - either something is true or is not true. Well, the dualism I think is probably true is that there is a non-physical (that is - non explainable with the current physics) part of existence of the mind that has been called by some the Akashic Field.
But ANUS always said: If there is some other world or realm or whatever, it operates in relation to this one. That does not necessairily mean that this that you are perceiving now is "the highest", but it means that fantasy is where it belongs: In the realm of the unreal. That does not mean that somethings that are considered phantasy can not be real. It means that we have to ACCEPT reality - Reality - What Happens.
What I got from this non-dualism is this: Not of your bullshit is real. None of your ego-phantasiez. None of your shit. The fact that there is a brutal physical reality does not undermime your spirituality: It just makes it brutal.
People get BLIND all the time. That is fucked up. That is, tough, only bad if you have attachment, because if you were an extreme buddhist you would not attach yourself to vision. That is, all of our problems are created by ourselves - not really that we decided it, but by our stubbornes (born stubborn) we created it - by our sttuborn ways of believing what our parents told us - if you believe you're entitled to vision, you will work out and be a God - 99,09% of the time - the other 0,01% are gonna have to deal with blindness - but then, you always have the astral or dream world, where you don't necessairliry need your vision - or do you? But it's hard to adapt - attachment.
The only thing I have not figured out is extreme torture - can that be solved with some sort of non-attachment - or - is - the- world just wicked?
35
Chasm / Nothingness after death - As uncertain as afterlife
« on: December 18, 2011, 06:01:57 PM »
I see some people saying that when you die, it's all over, and nothing remains, literally nothing. I find this as devoid of reason as saying there is heaven or other afterlife.
"Realistic" people may try to convince me that whe I die there will be "nothing", total destruction. But what is the base for that claim? Absolutely none. The person who feels smater than christians or other people for believing he is going to be totally vanished and nothing will exist after that is as deluded as anyone. Let's analyze:
1. Have they ever died? Then how come they know what it's like?
2. If they claim that it is because all brain activity will cease, then have they ever experienced this nothingness they talk about? If not, how can they claim that it exists? This is as speculative as assuming the existence of God. No one that I know of has ever experienced nothing. There is always something everywhere. It contradicts the laws of physics. So where the hell did they get this nothingness from?
3. If they say that they have actually experienced nothingness, and that it was the state before they were born, then how do they know how it was like then, if they were not even born yet? If they know what nothing feels like because they were not born, I can know what the big bang or the first human being making fire was like, because I was not born in that time too. Seems unrealistical? Then why the nothingness assumption seems realistical? Because they cannot remember what it was like before being born? I can not remember what is was like being 1 month old, or being in the uterus (and they say babies dream there). Does that mean there was nothingness there too? Why should the fact that there is no memory before we were born account for nothingness before and after life, if the fact that there is no memory of early stages of consciousness does not?
To resume: No one has ever seen this "nothing", it is a concept created by humans with as much evidence as any god or afterlife. Anyone that thinks they are smater for facing the terrible abyss of blackness that is death and not delude themselves with afterlife does so out of their imagination alone.
I
"Realistic" people may try to convince me that whe I die there will be "nothing", total destruction. But what is the base for that claim? Absolutely none. The person who feels smater than christians or other people for believing he is going to be totally vanished and nothing will exist after that is as deluded as anyone. Let's analyze:
1. Have they ever died? Then how come they know what it's like?
2. If they claim that it is because all brain activity will cease, then have they ever experienced this nothingness they talk about? If not, how can they claim that it exists? This is as speculative as assuming the existence of God. No one that I know of has ever experienced nothing. There is always something everywhere. It contradicts the laws of physics. So where the hell did they get this nothingness from?
3. If they say that they have actually experienced nothingness, and that it was the state before they were born, then how do they know how it was like then, if they were not even born yet? If they know what nothing feels like because they were not born, I can know what the big bang or the first human being making fire was like, because I was not born in that time too. Seems unrealistical? Then why the nothingness assumption seems realistical? Because they cannot remember what it was like before being born? I can not remember what is was like being 1 month old, or being in the uterus (and they say babies dream there). Does that mean there was nothingness there too? Why should the fact that there is no memory before we were born account for nothingness before and after life, if the fact that there is no memory of early stages of consciousness does not?
To resume: No one has ever seen this "nothing", it is a concept created by humans with as much evidence as any god or afterlife. Anyone that thinks they are smater for facing the terrible abyss of blackness that is death and not delude themselves with afterlife does so out of their imagination alone.
I
36
Metal / All Styles of Electronic Music in Flash Presentation
« on: December 10, 2011, 05:41:29 PM »
This is the greatest website on electronic music. It covers all styles and sub-divisions of electronic music that exist, with explanations and samples, in a flash presentation.
http://techno.org/electronic-music-guide/
Enjoy
http://techno.org/electronic-music-guide/
Enjoy
37
Chasm / It is possible to fight society
« on: December 07, 2011, 03:19:28 PM »
This guy was evil, but he knew what he wanted. The guy was almost blind, but accomplished a lot. His name was Shoko Asahara and he founded a religious group based on a few irrational beliefs. All that is real is irrational, but not all that is irrational is real. I guess the obssession with apocalyptic stuff is symbolic, he was trying to realize the apocalypse in himself and his followers. That shows it to the people who think those disciplines that he followed are useless.
The guy started as the leader of a small religious group based on buddhism and tantra and ended up founding a small city with its own stores, houses, chemical laboratories, arsenal, etc... and expanded even to russia. They made chemical weapons and a lot of stuff there. Amazing. If he had not made the decision to murder, he would still be active now. Before he got murderous he even appeared on japanese tv with famous aktor Takeshi Kitano, funny as hell. I like the film "Brother" with this actor, and also "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence". That guy is funny, you can see the interview in youtube, you can see the guy is asking serious questions but there is a very funny humour beneath it all, beneath his actions. I'm guessing it could be because it was all pre-programmed between them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUvrLqXvUsM
Here is some information:
http://www.american-buddha.com/shokoasahara.htm
I'm planning to read the book that is quoted in the article, "The cult of the end of the world".
The guy started as the leader of a small religious group based on buddhism and tantra and ended up founding a small city with its own stores, houses, chemical laboratories, arsenal, etc... and expanded even to russia. They made chemical weapons and a lot of stuff there. Amazing. If he had not made the decision to murder, he would still be active now. Before he got murderous he even appeared on japanese tv with famous aktor Takeshi Kitano, funny as hell. I like the film "Brother" with this actor, and also "Merry Christmas Mr. Lawrence". That guy is funny, you can see the interview in youtube, you can see the guy is asking serious questions but there is a very funny humour beneath it all, beneath his actions. I'm guessing it could be because it was all pre-programmed between them. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUvrLqXvUsM
Here is some information:
http://www.american-buddha.com/shokoasahara.htm
I'm planning to read the book that is quoted in the article, "The cult of the end of the world".
38
Chasm / Questions about Gnosticism, Luciferianism and The Occult
« on: December 01, 2011, 03:09:27 PM »
I'm going to interview Jeremy Christner, who is a researcher on gnosticism and luciferianism, and was also on the metal band vrolok on 2 of their albums and has his own solo work Great American Desert. I never heard any of those bands so I can't talk about this.
My interest is in his written works, his book Kosmology about luciferianism is extremely interesting and informative, it provides a coherent theory on his views of reality. His current work Order Of The Skeleton Key can be purchased in his website Lux Ferous Press, http://www.luxferous.com/. Order(...) consists of an expanded versions of his 2 books. He studies gnosticism, lucifer, the occult for quite some time.
I recomend that everyone buys his works if interested in the topics mentioned.
Unfortunately I don't see many people here who are interested in this kind of writings, but if there is, I'm going to interview the guy and it's going to be posted both on brazilian anus and on the anus blog entry. So if anyone has any questions you can post it here and I'll try to include it in the interview.
He exposes the luciferian path so if you are a researcher about that you can ask questions too without necessairly being familiar with his written work. Altough he studied the occult, his interest is not on sorcery.
--
information about books
Kosmology - Kosmology emerges with a new, coherent take on Luciferian Philosophy, fusing Gnostic Theogony from antiquity and modern Theoretical Physics, as well as a number of sources of Classical Philosophical thought to be used as a metaphor for the illusory veil of matter and the true nature of the Demiurge's law. Lucifer grants his students fragments of Truth throughout their lives, fragments which ultimately culminate into one grand picture. Kosmology is but a recording of the Truth granted to the author thus far in his life.
Lanterns - Lanterns...beacons of illumination in the Darkness, casting knowledge upon the ignorant. Each of the 27 chapters housed in Lanterns of Wisdom from the Firmament illustrates a unique sentiment, each Lantern revealing a unique face of Gnosis. At once beautiful and blasphemous, stacking meaning upon meaning, Lanterns is a fountain of eternal revelation; Lanterns is the holy scripture of a Luciferian's faith.
Order Of The Skeleton Key - Consisting of the Gnostic texts, Kosmology, and Lanterns of Wisdom From the Firmament, both texts in their entirety with multiple heretofore unreleased chapters included. Released in two editions (hard and soft cover), each limited to 100 hand-numbered copies.
My interest is in his written works, his book Kosmology about luciferianism is extremely interesting and informative, it provides a coherent theory on his views of reality. His current work Order Of The Skeleton Key can be purchased in his website Lux Ferous Press, http://www.luxferous.com/. Order(...) consists of an expanded versions of his 2 books. He studies gnosticism, lucifer, the occult for quite some time.
I recomend that everyone buys his works if interested in the topics mentioned.
Unfortunately I don't see many people here who are interested in this kind of writings, but if there is, I'm going to interview the guy and it's going to be posted both on brazilian anus and on the anus blog entry. So if anyone has any questions you can post it here and I'll try to include it in the interview.
He exposes the luciferian path so if you are a researcher about that you can ask questions too without necessairly being familiar with his written work. Altough he studied the occult, his interest is not on sorcery.
--
information about books
Kosmology - Kosmology emerges with a new, coherent take on Luciferian Philosophy, fusing Gnostic Theogony from antiquity and modern Theoretical Physics, as well as a number of sources of Classical Philosophical thought to be used as a metaphor for the illusory veil of matter and the true nature of the Demiurge's law. Lucifer grants his students fragments of Truth throughout their lives, fragments which ultimately culminate into one grand picture. Kosmology is but a recording of the Truth granted to the author thus far in his life.
Lanterns - Lanterns...beacons of illumination in the Darkness, casting knowledge upon the ignorant. Each of the 27 chapters housed in Lanterns of Wisdom from the Firmament illustrates a unique sentiment, each Lantern revealing a unique face of Gnosis. At once beautiful and blasphemous, stacking meaning upon meaning, Lanterns is a fountain of eternal revelation; Lanterns is the holy scripture of a Luciferian's faith.
Order Of The Skeleton Key - Consisting of the Gnostic texts, Kosmology, and Lanterns of Wisdom From the Firmament, both texts in their entirety with multiple heretofore unreleased chapters included. Released in two editions (hard and soft cover), each limited to 100 hand-numbered copies.
39
Metal / Good electronic music
« on: November 25, 2011, 02:20:10 PM »
It's about time we posted good non-ambient electronic music, no? What are the opinions on the following:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhPjT0NI3BI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWpHRrXa9c8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u67zwWL1xSQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPWWlc4CUtg
the best songs by daft punk are actually from the album Homework
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lhPjT0NI3BI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWpHRrXa9c8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u67zwWL1xSQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bPWWlc4CUtg
the best songs by daft punk are actually from the album Homework
40
Chasm / The Real Consequence Of Pentti-Linkola Like Thought
« on: October 21, 2011, 10:46:59 PM »
First, the facts: This site supports pentti linkola, a guy who says he would push a button if it meant millions of people would die (I'm assuming it's random people). The world has billions of people and this action would not change anything, by the way
In my interview with prozak he says he think socialism has done well to the chinese. I don't know much history, but I'm pretty sure Mao Tse Tung killed a whole bunch of the chinese population in that revolution. I'm pretty sure linkola enjoys him too. The chinese, from what I gather from photos, like to hang pictures of him to honor him. I remember prozak cheering the death of a little girl killed by her parents too in his blog. Now I'm sure everyone has seen the video below now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKR0_4lqg_A
How is that different from the mentality of this website? There are billion chinese people, why should they bother if that little girl gets run over? I don't agree with that mentality, but I don't see much difference between the consequences of the type of mentality exposed in this website and the video. I don't think the contributors and creator of site would not help a girl run over, but I do believe the consequences of their thought can lead to that mentality.
Can anyone give me any reason why any of those people who did not stop for the girl should have helped her? There is excessive population there, the people were probably busy working. Plus if you hail mass murderes I think that can impact on the way people value human life. They see each other exactly as ANUS: As whole, part of an organism, anti-individualism, etc...
I've said this some times here, I don't agree with this extreme anti-humanism.
The boundaries between satire, irony and shock value and true intentions and opinion here are not always clear to me, but the consequence is always the death of innocents, as David Myatt (another who probably was responsible, even if indirectly, for death of innocent people) pointed in his article "An Allegory Of Pride and Presumption", which I translated for the Brazilian ANUS. I used to ignore some things in my teenhood, like the fact that the unabomber is a murderer. And no, saying "it could have been me or a loved one" is not lame, it's real and no one wants that. The only people who adore Theodore are the ones whose loved ones were not severely injured or killed, or have been themselves, by his bombs. OR, people like those chinese, who do not view human life the way, I can only speak for myself, I do. I agree and admire the text industrial society and its future and can relate with the author, not with his extreme intelligence, but with his neurosis. But he was a killer, as was charles manson was a criminal, as were columbine and the native american-white mixed shooter, william pierce promoted the death of innocents in his novel Hunter, etc...
Once you get in that mentality it's hard to find your way back, check this out, and the "warriors" listed:
James lee is the only one I agree with in that list.
That's why I'll joy the Integralists, a CHRISTIAN honorable brazilian group that fights for justice and Jesus.
In my interview with prozak he says he think socialism has done well to the chinese. I don't know much history, but I'm pretty sure Mao Tse Tung killed a whole bunch of the chinese population in that revolution. I'm pretty sure linkola enjoys him too. The chinese, from what I gather from photos, like to hang pictures of him to honor him. I remember prozak cheering the death of a little girl killed by her parents too in his blog. Now I'm sure everyone has seen the video below now:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKR0_4lqg_A
How is that different from the mentality of this website? There are billion chinese people, why should they bother if that little girl gets run over? I don't agree with that mentality, but I don't see much difference between the consequences of the type of mentality exposed in this website and the video. I don't think the contributors and creator of site would not help a girl run over, but I do believe the consequences of their thought can lead to that mentality.
Can anyone give me any reason why any of those people who did not stop for the girl should have helped her? There is excessive population there, the people were probably busy working. Plus if you hail mass murderes I think that can impact on the way people value human life. They see each other exactly as ANUS: As whole, part of an organism, anti-individualism, etc...
I've said this some times here, I don't agree with this extreme anti-humanism.
The boundaries between satire, irony and shock value and true intentions and opinion here are not always clear to me, but the consequence is always the death of innocents, as David Myatt (another who probably was responsible, even if indirectly, for death of innocent people) pointed in his article "An Allegory Of Pride and Presumption", which I translated for the Brazilian ANUS. I used to ignore some things in my teenhood, like the fact that the unabomber is a murderer. And no, saying "it could have been me or a loved one" is not lame, it's real and no one wants that. The only people who adore Theodore are the ones whose loved ones were not severely injured or killed, or have been themselves, by his bombs. OR, people like those chinese, who do not view human life the way, I can only speak for myself, I do. I agree and admire the text industrial society and its future and can relate with the author, not with his extreme intelligence, but with his neurosis. But he was a killer, as was charles manson was a criminal, as were columbine and the native american-white mixed shooter, william pierce promoted the death of innocents in his novel Hunter, etc...
Once you get in that mentality it's hard to find your way back, check this out, and the "warriors" listed:
Quote
When the spirit awakens and starts to liberate itself, it's fundamental that all the process is fit and guided by the true Gnosis or Primordial Gnosis. If not the aggression proper of the spirit would be directed at any point of the demiurge's universe, at all the created, false and ephemeral. When the spirit starts to awaken, it's normal to see the demiurge in every piece of matter, in every atom, and in every human being see a zombie at the service of the demiurge. Then, the ire of the spirit is difficult to control, as are the unstopable desire to go out in the street and kill the first one passing by. Every action without strategy would result fatally harmful to the initiate still not transmuted nor liberated completely.
As a way of example, the young men that carried out the massacre of Columbine passed months watching movies of national-socialist acts full of swastikas and other symbols. Their minds have altered in such way that produced the facts known by all.
Results in those cases: wasted warriors, lost possibilites.
http://www.gnosisprimordial.com/?p=803
James lee is the only one I agree with in that list.
That's why I'll joy the Integralists, a CHRISTIAN honorable brazilian group that fights for justice and Jesus.
41
Chasm / How can I be tough?
« on: September 25, 2011, 07:11:00 PM »
How can I man up and be tough?
I'm no tough guy, but I understand it's better to bulk up. I know my limitations, but it's always better to evolve. How did the members of the phorum became tough?
PS: I know I can't become tough by reading internet postings, that's just a complement. I have a life.
PS2: I don't want to put myself in risk of dying, mutilation, crippling.
I'm no tough guy, but I understand it's better to bulk up. I know my limitations, but it's always better to evolve. How did the members of the phorum became tough?
PS: I know I can't become tough by reading internet postings, that's just a complement. I have a life.
PS2: I don't want to put myself in risk of dying, mutilation, crippling.
42
Chasm / Sexual Techniques
« on: September 20, 2011, 06:49:17 PM »
Scanned this section of the book "The Forbidden Parapsychology" for you.
http://depositfiles.com/files/07nf8vgyb
http://depositfiles.com/files/07nf8vgyb
43
Chasm / Slowing down the mind
« on: September 16, 2011, 07:18:50 PM »
I have been addicted to entertainment since I was a kid. I watched television since kid, then it was the videogame, then the computer with internet. I think the computer made it even worse because the internet provides infinite stimulus in the form of many windows while also playing music in the background. Everyday. That is guaranteed to fuck the mind up. Not to mention Satanic Pornography.
Now as in sushil yadav's text, my mind is "racing".
I just want to know if anyone was succesful in slowing it down, because it seems very hard.
Now as in sushil yadav's text, my mind is "racing".
I just want to know if anyone was succesful in slowing it down, because it seems very hard.
44
Chasm / Too much cruelty?
« on: July 18, 2011, 05:35:32 PM »
"If Dave is mentally retarded or criminal, you might do it to his whole family."
I appreciate posts like the ones the words above came from as a kind of "wake up call" not to be taken extremely seriously. But I wonder. Isn't the author exposing his real opinion?
Would the author really think that killing a whole family because of one retarded or criminal individual is good? I mean, one can certainly find great people in families where there are people with down's syndrome or other, or in a family where there is a criminal. But I don't think that's even the point. Murdering a family is never a good idea, unless they're all retarded (I mean really retarded) or criminal. Was that written to justify the fact that there were children's skulls too? Yes, but did the author find this cool?
Let's say you have a friend whose father is a criminal. Would you appreciate that someone who was harmed by his father killed the whole family and your friend?
I would like to know the logic behind this. I think this is relevant. A lot of people may have been offended by unecessary cruelty. Unless the author really thinks this way, if that is the case, at least he is honest.
I appreciate posts like the ones the words above came from as a kind of "wake up call" not to be taken extremely seriously. But I wonder. Isn't the author exposing his real opinion?
Would the author really think that killing a whole family because of one retarded or criminal individual is good? I mean, one can certainly find great people in families where there are people with down's syndrome or other, or in a family where there is a criminal. But I don't think that's even the point. Murdering a family is never a good idea, unless they're all retarded (I mean really retarded) or criminal. Was that written to justify the fact that there were children's skulls too? Yes, but did the author find this cool?
Let's say you have a friend whose father is a criminal. Would you appreciate that someone who was harmed by his father killed the whole family and your friend?
I would like to know the logic behind this. I think this is relevant. A lot of people may have been offended by unecessary cruelty. Unless the author really thinks this way, if that is the case, at least he is honest.
45
Chasm / Sun position is different?
« on: June 28, 2011, 09:31:11 PM »
I noticed that the sun is rising on an unusual position lately. Did anyone notice this too?