Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - death metal black metal

1 ... 169 [170] 171 ... 177
Metal / Re: Why I am not a Satanist
« on: February 17, 2005, 07:54:06 AM »
I am the worse fear of the Jew, incarnate. I am his Satan. WHom better to be Satan to than a smelly African-American or other Mud?

This approach would not work for me.

My goal is to build, not destroy. I want to work on my own race and I don't give a damn about any others, although by the nature of my self-bearing I usually opt to avoid negative behavior toward others.

Metal / Re: Averse Sefira - April 9, 2005
« on: February 10, 2005, 06:08:37 PM »
Unless something very drastic happens, not me.  Three hours each way is too fucking far for a concert.


Metal / Solace of Requiem
« on: February 10, 2005, 06:08:16 PM »
Solace of Requiem sounds a little like every great early 1990's death metal band there was with some obvious non-metal influences.


Metal / Re: Seeking opinions?
« on: February 08, 2005, 03:54:57 PM »
Miasma only came about 11 years before Cult of Luna or Isis...

Metal / Re: Averse Sefira - April 9, 2005
« on: February 08, 2005, 06:04:15 AM »
Who else from Texas is going to this?

Metal / Fireaxe
« on: February 06, 2005, 11:00:12 AM »
Subversion is what I do best…

                      The Burning Blade

              Fireaxe Newsletter - edition 8.2

                      Feb 4, 2005


              "Force your will upon the world
              and enslave us to your dream."
                              - Fireaxe "River of Madness"

      We are all told to follow our dreams, strive to satisfy our
desires, and fight hard to keep what is ours, but what happens when
achieving those goals is unrealistic or simply impossible?  Few of us
like to admit defeat or part with our highest aspirations and so when
our dreams come into conflict with reality it is often reality, or our
perception of it, which is altered to accommodate the dream.  We
try to imagine a reality in which our dreams come true and thus,
truth is often the first casualty of desire.
      Take, for example, our civic responsibilities.  We all want
the things that the government provides for us, police protection,
good schools, better roads, and assistance for the unfortunate, and we
want to see these things improved and better funded.  But whenever
new taxes are proposed to pay for those improvements we flatly refuse
to pay and vote them down.  Do we think that the money will come
out of thin air?  Of course not.  We want everyone else to pay more,
believing, generally without any factual support, that we're paying
enough, or too much, and others aren't.  We don't bother examining
the issue since we might find out that we are wrong, and when we do
stumble upon facts, we accept them selectively, based on what it is
that we want to believe.  The end result that we collectively want more
than we are willing to pay for and we all live in our own little worlds
with our own ideas of what government needs to do to fix the problem.
And so even in a crisis, which inevitably results, there is little consensus,
and any way that we end up settling things appears unjust to many of
us, ensuring future conflict and dissent.
      In this example it is easy to see that we are collectively acting
in a way which makes things harder for ourselves.  That much is simple.
Figuring out a system for calculating each individual's tax burden
fairly is not simple, and getting everyone to agree that the system is
just is virtually impossible.  The basic problem is that we all feel
entitled to more than we can collectively have, an attitude that extends
to far more than just taxation and civic improvements.  It is a simple
truth that we cannot all be above average although we can all want to
be.  And though while a few of us actually make our wildest dreams
come true, the vast majority of people who dream of winning a Super
Bowl, getting elected president, or becoming a big rock star have those
dreams dashed sooner or later.  But since dreams don't die easily, the
demand for special things far outweighs the supply, guaranteeing
conflict, and not always in the form of healthy competition.
      Collectively we invite trouble by chasing dreams and shooting
for the stars, but individually it is the best way for us to achieve those
goals.  The more you want something, the more motivated you will be
to achieve it, and the more likely you will push yourself to become the
best that you can possibly be.  As individuals it is better for us to lose
our larger perspective, pushing aside the possibility that we could lose
and ignoring the plight of those who inevitably will.  We benefit from
focusing solely on achieving our personal goals for holding back in
any way results in losing ground to those who do not care about the
impact their intense desires cause.  We try so hard because we know
that when the day of victory occurs the winners will take all and the
losers will be sent home in shame.  To work hard and fail is the worst
possible outcome, so we push ourselves to extremes to succeed.  Extreme
rewards invite extreme competition and all the ugliness that surround
such behavior.  And it isn't just those who push too hard who deserve
the blame, all of us support the system in our attitudes towards the
winners and losers, and thus we encourage the system towards
      Such a highly competitive system produces great champions,
but it also has the severe drawback of being stunningly myopic.  Having
a larger perspective on competition, life, and the world we live in is a
liability and as a result many of us do not even bother gathering a deep
understanding of things.  Our personal goals become all-consuming,
and anyone or anything that gets in our way is viewed as being an
enemy to be defeated.  Long term planning is cast aside for greater
returns on short term goals for if you are not sure that you will be on
top for long, why plan for something that will be of greater benefit to
the one who beats you and takes your place?
      Such systems are not stable due to lack of foresight on the
part of those within them.  To some degree that is a good thing, since
all will be given a respite from the madness as the system collapses,
but a catastrophic collapse is far from enjoyable and often we choose
to support the system since it is the lesser of two evils.
      Speaking of evil, I, as well as Octavio Ramos, are hard at
work writing material for the new project "Eternal Devotion to the
Dark Goddess".  Although many miles apart, thanks to the internet
we are busy co-authoring what promises to be one of the hottest tracks
on the disk.  I plan to write out all the tracks before starting the
recording process, so it will be a while before I'll have cuts from the
new CD for you to hear.  Stay tuned.
      A big ‘Hello’ to anyone receiving the Burning Blade for the
first time.  This is the Fireaxe newsletter.

Some good reviews and a hearty hail to Fireaxe's biggest supporters

      More reviews of "Victory or Death" have come in and the
new ones have been more positive than the older ones.  As before, the
reviewers don't go into depth about the music, sticking mainly to
reporting who Fireaxe is, which bands Fireaxe sounds like, and
giving the music an overall rating.  That's pretty much what every CD
gets except for those the reviewer either loves or loathes, so I'm not
getting, nor am I demanding, special treatment.  But what disappoints
me about webzine reviews is how little publicity they have generated
for Fireaxe.  I have yet to have a single person tell me that they found
out about Fireaxe through a webzine demo review of "Victory or Death".
It makes me wonder if anyone bothers reading them at all.
      So is it all wasted effort?  Probably not, since publicity of any
kind is beneficial, even bad press.  A few years back someone who ran
a site where every week he posted a "worst of the internet" award along
with a ridicule-filled rant stumbled across the Fireaxe site around the
time that "Lovecraftian Nightmares" was in release.  The guy did a
pretty nasty write-up, although he was so uninformed about Fireaxe
that his cheap shots completely missed their target.  But not long after
that I got an e-mail from one of his readers who had decided to listen
to a few Fireaxe mp3s, liked them, and wanted to order a copy of the
CD.  Mind you, that's not the kind of attention I'd like to get, but it
just goes to show that there is some truth behind the adage that
"any press is good press".
      But it seems like in the super-saturated market for new music
that good press doesn't get anyone's attention unless it's extremely good
press, and I am thankful that Fireaxe has a number of people who have
been so inspired by my music that they've written glowing reviews of
Fireaxe in high traffic areas on the internet.  They have been the ones
who have spread Fireaxe around the world, encouraging many to at
least listen to what I have to offer and decide for themselves if they
like it.  A hearty hail goes out to Lord Vic and his constant praise of
Fireaxe on metal-rules.com.  About 90% of the people who contact me
about buying CDs tell me that it was Lord Vic who prompted them to
sample Fireaxe mp3s.  I also owe a great debt to Bim Landers and
Nicolas Bonneau for their ongoing support.  Hails to you guys, and
many others, for keeping the spotlight on my works.
      Nicolas is my French distributor, and he'd be spreading CDs
across that beautiful country if there hadn't been a postal breakdown
along the way.  No one knows what happened, but somewhere between
here and there an uninsured, unregistered package containing ten copies
of "Food for the Gods" almost got lost in the mail, never to be seen
again.  After submitting a formal complaint to the postmaster the
package was returned to me more than three months after I sent it out,
along with a bill for the return postage.  Where had it been?  We are not
sure, but one of the stickers on it said that it had been through Germany.
Germany?  Exactly how the international postal service could take a large
package with the destination clearly written on it in big letters (FRANCE)
and send it to the wrong country is beyond me.  But at least I got the CDs
back, and soon Nicolas will be able to go about his work spreading the

The oppositional nature of consciousness

      In edition 7.6 of this newsletter I wrote a short essay which
probed the oppositional nature of ideologies.  I made quite a number of
points, the main ones being: that all ideologies are defined in opposition
to some threat to their existence; that they are at their most powerful and
motivated when fighting against that threat; and that in the absence of
that threat they seek out other rivals which can take the place of the
vanquished opposition.  In this newsletter I will make similar arguments
concerning consciousness and how people behave in much the same
way as ideologies.  But first there are a few things about ideologies that
I would like to comment on as they relate to the post-election period in
the U.S.  Note that I wrote about ideologies before the last election.
      In George W. Bush's second inaugural address it almost
seemed as if his speech writer was an avid reader of my newsletter,
using my theories to construct a speech which would motivate all
Americans to destroy our adversary, tyranny, in the name of our god,
Freedom.  Everything that I wrote about was in evidence in the address:
the warnings of complacency, the morphing of the dictatorships of old
into current world powers, and the depiction of the entire world as a
desperate struggle between good and evil.  It remains to be seen just
how much those ideals are put into actions but the "Freedom Crusade"
is certainly on the march.
      In BB7.6 I wrote, "In their quest to destroy their adversaries,
ideologies can turn inwards upon themselves, conducting a campaign
of ideological purification.  This often becomes necessary when a
substantial number of followers cannot make the connection between
the current adversary and the original adversary of the ideology."
By the time of the inaugural address this had already happened to a
great degree in the one area that President Bush had the most control
over, his cabinet.  Out went the last of the moderates and in went the
extremists and yes-men, or rather yes-persons.  Furthermore, in the
preceding months there had been an ideological purge at the CIA
with a number of senior officials being forced into retirement.  Added
to that was an expansion of an intelligence gathering group headed by
the pentagon which has no congressional oversight and is completely
controlled by the executive branch.  Even though it is this sort of
consolidation of power that the U.S. was created to oppose, as long
as the true believers in charge see a difference between themselves
and their enemies they will continue to seize power, in ways much
like their foes, to use against their enemies, foreign and domestic.
      I'd be very worried about this situation if it weren't for the
fact that control of the U.S. economy has been placed squarely in the
hands of foreigners, some of whom are run by the very governments
that the U.S. opposes.  With a massive debt and a constant need for
more loans, the U.S. government and its citizens can ill afford to
push their drive for "A New American Century" too far.  Foreign
investors can pull the plug at any time.  The only trouble is that if the
U.S. economy falls, everyone's economy falls, and so foreign lenders
see pulling the rug out from under America as a tool of last resort.
Nonetheless, I feel that time is getting close.
      Now, turning towards the oppositional nature of
consciousness.  In the Fireaxe theory I made the following
contentions regarding consciousness: that consciousness is created
by instilling within a person a permanent sense of inadequacy, in
essence a state of constant fear; and that the deeper the sense of
inadequacy, the stronger the person is motivated, generally to
serve their ideology.  It is here where we can see the reason why
both ideology and consciousness share an oppositional nature: an
ideology is much more unified if it, and its members, all stand together
in opposition to a similar foe.  It benefits an ideology to force its
oppositional nature on individuals.  Thus, within every ideology there
are a great number of lessons that are taught to its members about the
dangers of its adversary with the intent of crafting the consciousness
of its members in such a way that they fear and oppose it.  This unity
of vigilance solidifies the structure of the ideology as newly made
conscious members conform to the ideological system.
      I view consciousness as being a state of hyper-vigilance
necessary for survival within a modern society.  I've discussed my
theory on consciousness elsewhere and so I will only go over it briefly
here.  The demands of the modern world require each person to have
an internal model of the world which includes a model of himself or
herself which they can use to perform long term planning.  Long
term planning is critical in today's world, since without it you must
always react to things as they occur, which, in our modern society, is
often far too late.  You need to be able to plan for the future and
visualize yourself testing out various options to be able to make a
good choice.  Once you have such an internal model, you can see
yourself in your mind's eye, know that you exist, and thus are
      There are many dangers within our society despite its calm
appearance and overly-publicized sensational crimes.  Most of these
dangers come in the form of victimization and exploitation with
a great many of them being perfectly legal.  As a child you must
conform to avoid humiliation at the hands of your peers and work
hard to live up to the expectations of your parents and teachers.  As
an adult you face those same pressures and more, including living up
to the expectations of your boss and spouse, providing for your
family, and fending off the constant assault on your wealth from all
directions.  Failing in any one of these areas can result in anything
from mild discomfort to a major personal catastrophe, so we try hard
to succeed.  Successful defense requires consciousness so that we can
think through all the problems that we face and avoid falling for the
tricks and traps of clever con artists.  But consciousness is more than
something which forms when dangers are imminent and then goes
away when they are distant.  Consciousness is a permanent state, and
that implies a continuous source of danger.  I think that consciousness
is made permanent by repeatedly exposing someone to sometimes
traumatic failures until the fear of failure has been made indelible
in the mind of the individual.  This can come about as a series of
lesser traumatic events, a single very traumatic event, or some
combination of the two.  It matters not how it comes about, since the
important part is that the individual will always feel the fear of failure
and thus will always work towards preventing it.
      We don't set out to traumatize our children and peers, in fact
we usually set out to do the opposite since we love and respect them,
but both we and our society have expectations for our children that
they need to live up to or else they will suffer both in the present and
in the future.  So in order to help them to meet those expectations, we
are forced to motivate them to achieve.  We try to use the "carrot only"
approach, but that can only get us so far.  Punishment is required to
prevent our children from doing things that we don't want them to do
and also to prevent them from becoming spoiled, lethargic, or content.
So when they fall short, and they inevitably do, the hammer comes
down.  Punishment isn't necessarily a physical beating.  In fact, that
is not the most effective form of punishment.  Far more powerful,
and potentially traumatic or damaging as well, is some sort of
deprivation, such as taking away a beloved possession, social isolation,
or withholding affection from the child.  We don't want to do these
things, but we do them because we they work: motivation is increased
and expectations are often reached where the "carrot only" approach
had failed.  But there are dangers.  It isn't easy to get exactly the results
we want, usually because we are not in a rational state when we are
applying punishment, and severe trauma leading to mental disorders
can sometimes be the result.
      This may sound like I am contending that consciousness is
some form of insanity.  I wouldn't go so far as to say that, but due to
the similarities between consciousness and dissociation disorders it
seems that consciousness is in essence a mild form of dissociation
with similar causes and mechanisms.  Dissociation is a form of mental
paralysis, temporarily disconnecting mind from body, which stops the
person from moving or acting in any way.  It is the "freeze" part of the
instinctive fight, flight, or freeze reaction to dangers and served our
ancestors and predecessors well during encounters with predators who
located their prey primarily through detecting motion.  I think that in
conscious people, this dissociation mechanism enables us to stop and
think whenever we encounter dangers, serving as a layer between the
outside world and our thoughts, and as a layer between our thoughts
and our actions.  Since most of the dangers we face are not immediate,
we can afford the luxury of waiting and thinking through our options.
And since many of the dangers we face are complicated, we need to
prevent ourselves from acting reflexively or impulsively lest we do
the wrong thing.  Also, with practice, I think we are able to relax the
total paralysis part of the dissociation mechanism so that we can think
and act at the same time.  We can also learn to be thinking about one
thing while we are doing another, allowing us to deal with dangers
full time while going about our daily lives.  That is pretty much the
definition of dissociation, a sharp division between mind and body,
but not so sharp as to inhibit all action.  Thus, in my view, as conscious
organisms we are constantly in fear, to a degree, and constantly trying
to work our way out of that fear.  I think that the conscious state is one
of mild, controlled panic.
      The goal of child rearing is to place the child into this state
of controlled panic by applying punishment until the state becomes
permanent.  Now, it would seem that this type of child rearing would
result in the child having an adversarial relationship with the parent
since the parent is the one who applies the punishment.  Of course,
this is not desirable since the member of an ideology shouldn't come
to view a surrogate of that ideology as their adversary.  So instead,
the force which is responsible for a child's failure in meeting social
expectations is said to be something other than the punishing agent.
In most cases the child itself is blamed, or at least the part of the
child associated with the ideology's adversary.
      In Christian mythology, bad behavior is either blamed on the
devil, or stems from the evil within us all as a result of original sin.
This ties bad behavior to the abstract adversary of the ideology and
results in the process of socialization being portrayed as a battle
between good and evil for the child's soul.  In more secular ideologies,
bad behavior is seen as stemming from the child's animal instincts
which must be purged so that one can become civilized.  Note here
that seeing a part of one's self as being animalistic or evil and trying
to distance yourself from it contributes to the dissociative feature of
consciousness: the child tries to dissociate his mind from his body.
But regardless of ideology, during child rearing the adversary of the
ideology is always connected with the force which causes the constant
state of fear in the individual.  Furthermore, it is that constant state of
fear which drives consciousness, giving it a reason for being.  A child
is made constantly afraid of something and is constantly trying to figure
out a way to make the fear go away.  But the child cannot, as the fear
is a permanent feature, and thus so is conscious.  The adversarial
relationship lasts a lifetime.
      But it is not always the case that a child accepts the ideology's
adversary as his or her own.  In some cases the child will see his
punishment as unjust and see authority figures as adversaries.  This
form of anti-authoritarianism can also be bent to the will of the
ideology if the person can be made to see that the authority figures
he or she has contempt for are those of rival ideologies or are corrupt
members of the current ideology.  I think that the majority of people
have more than one adversarial prototype inside them, having
experienced different forms of at least minor trauma at the hands of
many, and that people have a mixture of both types of adversarial
relationships: the weaker adversary which needs to be controlled or
purged, and the stronger adversary which needs to be overthrown.
I also think that the mixture isn't always balanced with people
tending one way or another.  Putting terms to these two archetypes
I could call one conformist and authoritarian and the other rebellious
and anti-authoritarian, but in real life the labels will be blurred as
people share both forms and express them in different situations.
      In the essay I wrote on the adversarial nature of ideologies
I made a rather disturbing contention that in the absence of a rival
ideology which serves as an adversary, an ideology will either find a
new adversary or turn inward on itself, indulging in either purification
or ideological mutation.  I think  that the same premise is true for
consciousness.  Although the state of fear that drives consciousness
is permanent, it can grow stronger or weaker depending on external
forces which are perceived as threats.  Since this force directly drives
our consciousness, our drive and energy grow stronger as our fears
become greater.  Fear can be very motivating, and can propel us to
great heights, allowing us to reach our true potential, and thus it is
in our best interests not to live in peace, but in a manageable state
of fear.  And so, like ideologies, we make war on our adversaries
and seek out new adversaries to replace those that we have either
vanquished or are no longer a part of our lives.  And sometimes
we find surrogate adversaries to take the place of adversaries who
we cannot oppose in real life.  The reason is simple: the struggle
makes us strong.  It makes us who we are.
      This quest to defeat adversaries can take a socially positive
form, such as taking on great challenges, replacing them with
greater challenges after we've succeeded and the luster wears off our
past glories.  But the quest can also take on a socially negative form,
such as individuals seeking to re-live their past traumas in search of
revenge and finding new adversaries which will play the role of their
old ones.  Since past traumas deal with adversarial relationships with
authority figures, loved ones, and peers, re-living these events often
takes the forms of crime and disobedient behavior, deliberately
causing harm to a spouse or loved one, searching for or simply
provoking fights with others, or engaging in the same traumatic
behaviors experienced earlier in life, either from the submissive
side or the dominant side.  The abused becoming the abuser is a
common example of reliving traumatic experiences from the past.
Furthermore, since the adversary can never be truly beaten (it is
permanent in the mind) the struggle is often played out over and
over, becoming pathological, as if a person was addicted to the
      We can see this more easily in extreme cases, but the
mechanism of re-living past traumas applies to milder traumas
as well.  How many of us know of others who always seem to get
themselves into the same situations or conflicts over and over?
And how many of us seem to find ourselves re-living past traumas
or acting as those we once despised?  Doesn't it sometimes seem like
we are actively trying to bring these things on ourselves?  We are.
Although these are sometimes dangerous or self-destructive behaviors,
we do them because they reinforce our identity and make us feel
conscious and alive.  We are at our best when we are fighting tooth
and nail against our adversary although our "best" may be a shocking
display of cruelty or pathological behavior.  We do these things
because our alternative is to turn inward on ourselves, engaging in
self-hatred and a desire to change or purify ourselves.  But either
way we are driven by a desire to find and defeat new adversaries
be they others or ourselves.
      The concept of adversaries in the mind is nothing new.
They're also called "inner demons", "voices in our heads", "monkeys
on our backs", or simply "issues".  We all have them, to one degree
or another, but only see them as a problem when they cause very
anti-social or self-destructive behaviors.  The field of psychotherapy
is focused around ridding people of their worst adversaries or at least
allowing people to control them.  Since the Fireaxe theory states that
since adversaries are permanent, trying to rid yourself of them is
an exercise in futility.  However, it is possible to change the form
of your adversary by throwing off the old perceived causes of your
worst fears and adopting new ones.  This is what religion has done
for centuries.  Conversion is the process of freeing people from past
adversarial relationships while remaking those adversaries to be those
of the religion.  Though religious converts may claim to be free, they've
really only traded in their old inner demons for new ones.  But
conversion techniques are hardly restricted to religion, and you can
see examples of ideologies, advertisers, cults, and other institutions
using fear to sell their message.  And while sometimes they seem to be
selling only beautiful dreams, beware of the adversary coming in
through the back door.
      Consciousness and the permanent state of fear have a
symbiotic relationship.  We seek out new adversaries to make us
stronger, and we need to defeat our adversaries to make the pain
and fear go away, at least temporarily.  In essence we are trapped in
a continuous cycle of creating and destroying rivals, much like how
police shows require their writers to produce an endless succession
of criminals to be put behind bars.  Indeed, those shows, and movies,
that we love to watch are like surrogate experiences for us.  We
meet an adversary, he is built up into a fearsome force, and then
he is brought down to earth.  We feel uncomfortable when the fear
grows and relieved when it goes away, at least for a little while.
Sports contests act in a similar way, as do soap operas, reality
television, and especially computer games.  We become addicted to
these things, and our society's tremendous desire for such surrogate
experiences is strong support for an adversarial relationship lying
at the core of our being.
      If there is nothing that we can do about changing our
mental state, the question becomes how can we focus people towards
more socially positive behaviors rather than pathological ones.
I think that the key lies in a contention I made about ideological
struggle: that aggressive ideologies must continue to grow or face
internal strife as their aggressive members will feed on each other
to satisfy their needs.  Contentment is a behavior that is universally
viewed as bad by all modern societies and thus we are unable to
rest on our past achievements.  Growth is all important, and only
in a growing society it is possible for each person to reach a greater
height without taking away from someone else.  Without that
growth there will be internal conflict and pathological behaviors
of every kind.  So we are compelled to grow, sometimes at great
cost.  The trouble is that we live in a world which is both rapidly
expanding its population and rapidly exhausting its resources.
We cannot grow at this rate for long, and thus the future does not
look at all peaceful.

The Fireaxe theory - Outline

I. Basics - well established theories

1. Emergent systems - that complex systems can arise from the
interactions of simple things
2. Natural selection - that organisms mutate, proliferate, and compete,
with the "losers" becoming extinct
3. Behavioral science - that neurological systems, at their core, function
according to the rules of conditioning
4. Entropy - that within a closed system, entropy always increases,
which limits the amount of transformation that can occur

II. Extensions

1. That consciousness is an emergent system: a complex system arising
in the human mind from the interaction of simple neurons.
2. That civilizations are emergent systems arising from the physical
interactions of humans whether conscious or not.
3. That ideologies are emergent systems arising from the psychological
interactions of conscious humans
4. That emergent systems follow the laws of natural selection in much
the same way that organisms do
5. That the universe is, by definition, a closed system

III. Contentions regarding consciousness

1. That consciousness is a survival advantage
2. That being a member of an ideology is a survival advantage
3. That making its members conscious is a necessary part of an
ideology's survival
4. That consciousness is created by instilling within a person a
permanent sense of inadequacy - in essence a state of constant fear
5. That the deeper the sense of inadequacy, the stronger the person
is motivated  - generally to serve their ideology

IV. Contentions regarding ideological struggle

1. That ideologies fight for survival using many methods including,
but not limited to, war and enslavement
2. That aggression is a survival advantage
3. That aggressive ideologies make members of rival ideologies
feel afraid and inadequate which in response become more aggressive,
thus creating a vicious circle
4. That aggressive ideologies must continue to grow or face internal
strife as their aggressive members will feed on each other to satisfy
their needs
5. That internal struggle results in ideological mutation

V. Contentions regarding the future

1. That internal strife is inevitable since the laws of entropy imply
that continuous growth is not sustainable
2. That the abstract bases for ideologies transcend mortality and thus
suicidal aggression is not restrained by fear of death
3. That ideological mutation will eventually result in the creation of
a suicidal ideology which will attempt to save the human race by
destroying it

How to order Fireaxe CDs:

      Ordering Fireaxe CD's is an informal process as I am selling
them personally out of my apartment. Simply mail me a letter which
contains the following:

1. The names of the CDs that you want to buy.
2. The address where you want the CDs sent.
3. Cash, a check, or a money order for the total cost.

      Here is a price list.  The first number is the cost for U.S.
based customers, the second is for outside the U.S.  The prices
include shipping and handling.

Food for the Gods:      $12     $14
Victory or Death                $5      $7
Lovecraftian Nightmares $5      $7
A Dream of Death        $5      $7

      Send everything to:

      Brian Voth
      1301 Medical Center Dr. #415
      Chula Vista, CA 91911    USA

      If you review CDs on a website or in a magazine, any one
of the single CDs (Not "Food for the Gods") is free of charge in
exchange for the review.  In this case all I need is a request by
e-mail.  Please send me the URL of your review site or copy of your
magazine with the review in it when it is done.  If you want to
exchange CDs, tapes, or stuff of equivalent value, make these
requests via e-mail and we'll arrange a trade.
      The CDs come with a booklet filled with awesome art, a
letter about the project, and some information about the CD which
can also be found on the Fireaxe site.
      Lastly, if you want to print and distribute Fireaxe CDs I
can send you an additional CD which contains tiff files for all the
booklets, tray cards, and labels for each project.  The tiff disk is free
so just say the word.

The Future

      I’ve been focusing so hard on “Food for the Gods” that I’ve
had little time to think about what I’d like to record next.  Over the
past few months I’ve tossed around some ideas and have come up
with a working title and theme.  The next Fireaxe work will dig even
deeper into the dark crevices of our society and our minds, pull forth
the myths that we cling to and hold dear, and expose them all for what
they are.  While “A Dream of Death” explored the madness of dreams,
and “Food for the Gods” described the chaos wrought upon the earth
by ideologies, “Eternal Devotion to the Dark Goddess” will depict the
psychological enslavement of the individual in modern times.  It will
be the darkest Fireaxe work ever.  But don’t put your order in just yet.
After wrapping up “Food for the Gods” I’ll need a while to rest and
upgrade my studio.  I’m spent.
      My goal is to deliver music to whoever wants to hear it in
whatever way is necessary.  Whatever the market demands, I will supply,
but I do want to avoid the mass marketing channel.  Exposure is fine, but
in the modern business, the substance of the music must be altered to
match the demands of the marketplace.  This would totally defeat the
purpose of why I write music in the first place.  I write music because it
is a way to express my emotions.  What I both think and feel goes into
the songs.  That is the power, Fireaxe is the channel, and any diversion
diminishes the emotive effect.  Thus I try to avoid such diversions.
That is how art should be.

Rights to duplicate Fireaxe materials

      Currently Fireaxe is not for profit.  I sell the single CDs for
$5, $12 for "Food for the Gods" since it is three CDs, which covers
the production and mailing costs.  For CDs sent out of the country,
I'll have to charge an extra $2 per disk to cover the additional mailing
cost. If you write reviews or put samples on your website I'll give you a
CD for free.  Since I am not making any money with the current
recordings, you are free to make duplicates of them to distribute as
long as you obey the following guidelines:

1. You can only sell the duplications for the price of the medium or
      less, plus any delivery cost.  You are not allowed to make any
      profit with the music.
2. You should tell me how many copies you gave out and who got them so
      I can keep track.  Also, if they have an e-mail address I'd
      like that as well so I can add them to the mailing list.
3. You are likewise free to adorn any webpages or duplications with the
      gifs and jpgs on my website as long as you include an obvious
      link back to my website.  This includes putting Fireaxe song
      samples on your site as well.
4. You are free to play any Fireaxe songs (in unaltered form) provided
      you are an unsigned band without a marketing tie-in.  You are
      not allowed to record those songs onto anything that you will sell.
5. You are food for the gods.
6. You are required to crank the song "Hounds of Tindalos" as loud
      as you can as often as you can.  It’s your only defense against
      THEM.  Be warned, they come through angles.  Note that the
      CD is round.  Are your speaker cabinets square?
7. Cthulhu, the Necronomicon, Hastur the Unspeakable, and all other
      mythos creatures are purely the inventions of Lovecraft and
      other fiction authors.  None of it is real, at least that’s what
      I’m going to say in court if you try to sue me for destruction
      of your property, house, city, or soul as a result of listening
      to the “Lovecraftian Nightmares” CD too much.
8.  You are free to play "The Rack" in school or church or any other
      institution bent on crushing your will and turning you into a
      mindless zombie slave of the corporate dominated world.
      Try not to develop a bad attitude about it.
9. You are not free to commit suicide while listening to any Fireaxe
      song.  I'm sorry, I'll have to prosecute.  On a serious note,
      if you are thinking about doing it, please e-mail or call me
      if you have no one else to talk to.  When I was in my teens
      the album "The Wall" by Pink Floyd used to really get to me.
      Just hearing songs like "Comfortably Numb", and "Hey You"
      would get me pretty depressed and mildly suicidal.  I'm just
      trying to say that I've been there. If my music is having that
      effect on you, please get in touch.  You aren't alone.

      The gist of it is that you can do just about anything with the
music as long as you don't profit from it and that I get some sort of
credit for having written it.  I'm open to any methods of distributing
my music, such as compilation tapes or CDs, radio play, or recording
label distribution.  However, you will need my direct permission to
do so or some kind of legal agreement.

Ending Comments

      Any comments or questions are welcome.  If anyone has any
updates on their projects, I'd like to hear from you.  I know there
are a few people out there working on some cool things that I haven't
heard from in a while.  Drop me an e-mail regarding how you're
getting along.


"You shall break down their alters,
and dash into pieces their pillars,
hew down their asherim,
and burn their graven images with fire.
For I am a jealous god and I shall have no rivals."

                                      - Fireaxe "The Covenant"


Metal / Lust - Genesis of a Satanic Race
« on: February 03, 2005, 04:56:31 PM »
Lust "Genesis of a Satanic Race"

Blood Fire Death Records released the new full length CD of Canada's LUST, entitled "Genesis of a Satanic Race." It is incredibly harsh and dissonent occult metal which will surprise some who've heard the older Lust releases as there are many doom filled moments within the hellish insanity. Includes Spear of Longinus cover. Not for everyone...


Metal / Why I am not a Satanist
« on: February 03, 2005, 04:34:10 PM »
Why I am not a Satanist

Of all the subcultures to emerge following the dominance of rock over popular music, heavy metal and its associated genres remain unique in that they have maintained a counter-culture that targets not just the visible "establishment," but also all things that hold the core values of that philosophical system; metal is a naturalistic movement opposed to the utilitarian values of modern society, but it has kept its head up and thus far mostly avoided assimilation by not taking an explicitly political stance, but an artistic and metaphorical one.

This outlook has increasing driven it out of the mainstream consciousness, which has allowed it to keep its independence in part by mostly separating itself from the crowd of hopeless people looking for an identity and an easy, one-size-fits-all solution to they subliminal angst they feel about living in a fatalistic and submissive era. Of course, it has not managed this exclusively; some of the biggest sheep, and most profound losers, of our time have been metalheads, even some who have been very influential in the genre. In this way, within the metal genre the drama of the larger society is acted out in microcosm: the few who understand pulling away from the mass which wants what they have, and would emulate it to the point of drowning out legitimate voices in the genre.

What makes the mass destructive is the nature of a crowd, by definition: it is people who come together on the basest pretense and, out of fear for their individual selves, enacts a mass-will upon society at large to remove anything that threatens the herd. When you see a crowd, you are not seeing uniform people, but vastly different people who are disorganized and thus can only accept the lowest common denominator motivation, which is usually as follows: do not criticize me for anything that I do, insofar as I do not violate this basic tenet of crowd-belief toward others; give to me everything that our best people have, as I am participating in the crowd and thus "contributing." As with all utilitarian systems, this mentality punishes the more capable in order to keep the broader masses from feeling inferior, or that they're missing out.

Heavy metal music, by its very nature and alienation, recognizes that society operates on two levels: a public level, which comprises the kind of things you'd tell a crowd to make them feel you have their best interests at heart, and a private level, at which actual motivations are acted upon using the tokens of the public level in such a way that their function does not match their definition. It is a lot like hacking, actually; you overload some kind of input buffer with data that appears to be harmless, but contains concealed instructions that the machine, unaware that something labeled "data" might be "code," executes and hands control to the intruder. William S. Burroughs famously declared, "Language is a virus," and thus explained the same concept as applies to modern mass-media psychology.

What happens in a computer is that it confuses appearance with reality; the code is reality, but the idea that it is harmless data is the appearance. Similarly in our society we are divided between appearance, which generally consists of happy nonsense to keep you distracted, and reality, which is the relentless pursuit of wealth and a spiritual emptiness that justifies it. (As mentioned here before, this takes us back to a split that the Greeks noticed, between things as they are and their abstractions, which are often mentioned as that which casts a shadow, with the shadow we see being what we know of "reality.")

Since any tokens manipulated on the public level have dual meaning, and are thus meaningless, heavy metal targetted something more sublime: emotions and self-image. The Gothic, Romanticist, naturalistic and elitist-individualist imagery of even Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin did this, but it flowered from there into a proliferation of forms, each of which took the basic concept and developed it further, all without explicitly knowing why or what was being done. This ignorance of an articulation of what is being done allowed it to be passed, from mind to mind, through the subconscious channel of appealing imagery and concept in personal life, much as it was done in Romanticist literature, art and music: those who found greatness in the past, specifically medieval and ancient civilizations, and could process a melancholy acceptance of death and desire for personal greatness in heroic accomplishment, would naturally find the music appealing.

This is in part because, in addition to imagery, metal music literally sounds like the description of Romantic ideals above. It doesn't embrace the centralized harmonic structures of rock music, which is Indo-European folk music simplified to the degree of fixing a harmonic center and manipulating major/minor changes for mood, over a syncopated beat so that even the dumbest person can follow it, and it doesn't embrace the pleasing sounds and casual human vocal noises of pop. Where pop attempts to define beauty and approximate it as a medium, metal attempts to find what is beautiful in that which is, on the level of things that explicitly defined, ugly. If society exists on a level where public discourse is manipulated by private reality, metal is an inversion of that, such that the meaning of public discourse is found within private reality.

Metaphorically, metal almost exactly mirrors Romanticist literature, even down to its fascination with nature and the occult. Loneliness and alienation create independence; obsession with the forces of nature and the power of warfare creates a post-moralistic sense of seeing how life works rather than judging it; wandering into the embrace of Satan affirms the pagan belief that there can be no public level of "good" separated from "bad," but that good and bad are forces which together create a meta-good, mainly the ongoing process of life itself. These are the values of metal, and they are almost never explicitly spelled out because to do so, in the music, would be to expose the inner workings of the subculture to manipulation by those who have not discovered this meaning on their own; emulation and cheapening would follow.

For this reason, it is important to remember that Satanism in metal is metaphor. Many of the largest proponents of Satanic imagery in metal were Deists and some were Christians, but used Satan in a way similar to that of John Milton or William Blake to describe the individual Will or Ego; when Black Sabbath wrote "War Pigs," and described how modern society sends its workers off to die in foreign fields for abstract and mostly irrelevant political objectives masking a private reality of profit and power, they concluded it with "Satan laughing spreads his wings" not to praise Satan but to describe, in theological metaphor, what had occurred: humans had confused public reality with absolute truth, and thus been manipulated, and from that, an inner resentment and fatalism expressed itself in the confusion that followed. Satan laughing spreads his wings: a statement of the futility of our time, and in later bands, of the uselessness of religions that conflate Absolute truth with the public level of reality.

In doing this, metal attacked the fundamental Platonic split between the world of appearance and the world of structure; appearance was seen to be aesthetic, and not necessarily related to structure, which was defined by context, something which theological and occult imagery, by the nature of its cosmological outlook, expresses succinctly. While hardcore punk musicians attempted to rearrange the symbols of the public imagery into a meaningful private discourse, metal brushed past and declared the public reality defunct, urging its listeners to look instead toward their inner motivations and animal feelings. However, as with all things, the surging crowd - those who by definition did not and thus could not do it the first time around - sees something it likes and apes it furiously, producing a parody of it by only understanding the level of appearance and taking that appearance as truth, something which belongs to the domain of structure alone.

For this reason, although I have never been a Satanist, I have often employed Satanic and occult imagery in my writing, much as the smarter metal bands have done. In a world ruled by a Christian or secularized Christian (liberal) concept of absolute truth as public reality, one strikes back by upholding all that cannot be ruled by such a petty device, in the process pointing out that such dualistic thought patterns are in fact a simple rhetorical device misinterpreted by the crowd and thus used for its own purposes. In contrast, the crowd embraces Satanism as a truth in itself, and tries through silly literal rituals and laughable posing to be "truer" Satanists that the others, or more "extreme," or some variation of attempting to find a devotional truth in life. It cannot be done, and therefore these bands and individuals tend to ring hollow to the thinker, and their works -- well, let us say that in the years following 1996, there have perhaps been three black metal bands of the caliber of those who occurred 1990-1996, and it is similar in their own times with other subgenres of metal.

I can extend this concept further. National Socialism is popular in some black metal circles, but that is mainly because it's easier to label oneself a National Socialist and start collecting gear and posing than it is to understand the core concept of National Socialism, which is a feudalistic ethnocultural post-moral revival of classical Indo-European culture. That relatively complex thought gets distilled down to, as Faulkner said, "a hatred of black skins" alone, and thus parodies itself. What kind of idiot believes that African genocide will solve humanity's problems? Black Sabbath were more advanced in thought with "Satan laughing spreads his wings" than all the goose-stepping fools, or those from the opposite end who make the same mistake, the leftist: they assume that by labelling themselves as egalitarian and tolerant that humanity's problems will resolve themselves on the level of public discourse. All of them are misguided, and represent waste by the roadside of a path to knowledge.

Death metal and grindcore had its own version of this comedy. Bands like Carcass and Morpheus used intricate descriptions of death and decay as a way of reminding their audience that public reality is a dream designed to deny death, and that when we realize our own mortality, we can comprehend that meaning is not found in public discourse or in liberal/conservative platitudes, but in addressing reality - yes, actual reality, including that good and bad are needed to produce meta-good - we liberate ourselves from illusion and can begin work on the real task. They were followed by unnamed and now thankfully forgotten bands who found an identity in glorifying death, bloodshed, violence, disease, perversity and disgust, all in full ignorance of the original concept. It is not surprising the music of these bands was also of a lesser nature, as their thinking was clearer on a more basic, linear level.

In my view, there is truth to be found in all of these viewpoints, if interpreted correctly. National Socialism and liberalism are not that far apart when we look at their basic motivation; both want to establish healthy cultures where people are not left to the predatory whim of speculative capital. Satan and gore both wish to affirm natural belief over that of the thing-as-named public reality. Even Christians and pagans have the same essential goal, which is to find a larger reason to have values outside the material and thus find meaning in existence. However, our time is confused, as somewhere along the path to this "great" industrial society we have lost the systems of thought that give a whole meaning to the entire process of life, instead of selecting some aspect with which to label oneself and hold up as a shield of "meaning" against death. In a confused time, only a few actually seek truth, while everyone else looks for it as they might a product on a shelf or the best fruit among the ripening burden of branches.

This article is not an attempt to discredit or assault bands who use Satan as metaphor; much like Blake, or Dante, or Eliot, or any number of artists, their quest is legitimate. It should serve, however, as an introduction to the theory of metal as an art form, and an explanation of why there are so many mediocre imitators, of "Satanist" or leftist or NSBM variety alike, and only a few leaders, and thus, a mandate for future thinkers in this genre to start with the leaders and not the followers. Metal remains under assault by both public culture and public "counter-culture" (an anti-establishment affirmation of public cultural beliefs, in trendier form) alike, and thus must keep an intellectual and artistic lead or it will be assimilated and left with Slipknot, Korn and Creed as its tombstone.


Metal / Spear of Longinus - live march 19
« on: February 02, 2005, 10:34:43 PM »
brothers and sisters, it is the equinox of the gods. time to reaffirm our place in the cosmos......... and perhaps take things up a notch or two.

you are invited to assist us in this grand and solemn occassion conveniently placed at such an auspicious time, saturday march 19.

and place, upstairs at the jubilee hotel, valley , brisbane, australia.

other okkult chelas participating are

nocturnal graves (melbourne)
spear of longinus
ruptured harmony


Metal / Re: Seeking opinions?
« on: January 31, 2005, 07:50:52 PM »
German thrash besides big three(destruction, kreator, sodom)? Also recommended albums for destruction and sodom?

Sodom - Persecution Mania

I do not recommend Kreator, and can only halfway recommend Destruction.

I would also seek Atrocity and Blood, however.

Metal / Hessian Studies
« on: January 30, 2005, 08:31:35 PM »
If at the "modern" university we have a Black Studies Department, and an Asian Studies Department, why not a Hessian Studies Department?


Metal / Definitive metal albums
« on: January 29, 2005, 11:30:30 AM »
In all of any genre, there's a few that really nail what it is to be that genre, and these tend to be known to history while others are footnotes. Another "list shit that you think impressed you" thread is NOT needed, so please don't do the typical Internet shithead thing and list fifteen obscure bands that make you sound cool, in your own world. Instead, think about the handful of bands that defined metal.

Death Metal
Morbid Angel - Blessed Are the Sick, Covenant
Deicide - Legion
Demilich - Nespithe
Incantation - Onward to Golgotha

Black Metal
Burzum - Filosofem, Hvis Lyset Tar Oss
Darkthrone - Transilvanian Hunger
Immortal - Pure Holocaust
Enslaved - Vikinglgr Veldi

Speed Metal
Metallica - Master of Puppets
Slayer - Reign in Blood
Megadeth - Peace sells...

Metal / Glenn Snelwar: Gordian Knot guitarist
« on: January 21, 2005, 03:39:18 PM »
Torn Between Dimensions

At War With Self is the project name for an instrumental trio that was put together by guitarist/composer Glenn Snelwar. He is perhaps best known for his vital contributions to the first offering from Sean Malone's Gordian Knot project. At War With Self's debut release, Torn Between Dimensions, features Snelwar on guitars, mandolins and keyboards, Michael Manring on fretless bass and e-bow, and Mark Zonder on drums and percussion. Mark Zonder's progressive drumming forms the backbone for Snelwar's guitars, mandolins and keyboards that intertwine with Michael Manring's expressive fretless bass lines and e-bow. The idea behind Torn Between Dimensions is to create compositions that have an intensity of emotion and incorporate a wide variety of influences. Derived from an equal passion for progressive rock and metal bands such as King Crimson, Voivod and Pink Floyd, classical composers such as Leo Brouwer, Bela Bartok and Heitor Villa Lobos, to such diverse influences as bluegrass and jazz, Torn Between Dimensions is the realization of how Glenn chooses to take these influences and combine them into something undeniably progressive and strikingly original. The end result is a dense wall of sound, where multiple genres are explored within each song, as one song flows seamlessly into the next.


The intent of my work is to create innovative, experimental compositions using classical, electric guitars, mandolin, various percussion, piano and string sections, that encompass many influences and genres.


Metal / Re: Growing out of Metal?
« on: January 21, 2005, 02:45:03 PM »
Metal made me a eugenicist when I saw how different the new fans were from the older ones. Yes, there have always been stupid people in metal - hordes of 'em. But there was once a leadership caste as well, and now it's mostly gone.

Metal / Re: Averse Sefira - April 9, 2005
« on: January 19, 2005, 11:33:39 AM »
I think it's something great. Averse Sefira are one of the few bands upholding the black metal tradition; I think Vex has promise in its future.

I'll be skipping "Hammer Whore" purely because of the idiotic name, but that isn't a moral judgment; it's an aesthetic one.

Much better than anything the normal AIDS-infested Austin scene, with its queens like Vesperian Sorrow and hippie liberal punk bands, will achieve.

Good work!

1 ... 169 [170] 171 ... 177