Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - Cynical

[1] 2 3
1
Metal / Voivod: "Mechanical Mind" [new song]
« on: September 28, 2012, 06:23:18 PM »
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/tracks/14327-mechanical-mind/

If this is representative of the quality of their upcoming album, then it's going to be one of the best of the last decade.

2
Metal / Perdition Temple- Edict of the Antichrist Elect
« on: August 29, 2012, 05:57:49 AM »
In an attempt to atone for exposing you all to the faggotry that is "Amorphis doing acoustic jazz covers of songs from their first album", I will tell you that you need to listen to this post-Angelcorpse project from Gene Palubicki.  Now.

"Edict of the Antichrist Elect" by Palubicki's new band, Perdition Temple, is supposedly material that was written to be the next Angelcorpse album that was never realized because of the band's second dissolution, and some aspects of the album are recognizably Angelcorpse, such as nearly constant speed, militaristic march-blasting percussion, and Morbid Angel inspired high-speed riffs, but there is a major difference in how songs are constructed.  Whereas Angelcorpse tended to bow to the heavy metal need for one or two ear-grabbing, catchy riffs to define a song, with other riffs acting as support between fist-pumping choruses and the song's "iconic" riffs, Edict of the Antichrist Elect takes a more pure death metal approach, with no "catchy" riffs or choruses and more intricate song structures, with frequent riff changes, sometimes gradual, and sometimes jarring; a favorite tactic of the band is to build up gradual riff changes before violently slamming back to an earlier riff.  Structuring songs with no clearly "iconic" passages results in the album requiring careful attention, and being confusing to listen to at first, but the overall effect ends up being more savage than even Angelcorpse's fiercest moments, since there's not an easily hummable moment always around the corner; rather, there is just more jarring angularity, both at a structural level and at a riff level.

Listen to this album.  Now.

(Obligatory youtube link of a song: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RcWI3XRtTw )

3
Metal / WTF happened to Amorphis?
« on: August 27, 2012, 01:18:43 PM »

4
Metal / new Angel Witch coming
« on: February 07, 2012, 03:19:36 PM »
Angel Witch has a new album coming out soon.

Live performance of a song from it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rpY6g8TnamI

I'm torn on this.  On one hand, a band that old getting back together can't possibly be good.  On the other hand, this song is much better than expected, and, at least on a first listen, the quality is comparable to the first full length...

5
Metal / New Asphyx track
« on: December 16, 2011, 04:15:33 AM »
http://www.cvltnation.com/exclusivecvlt-nation-streaming-asphyx-deathhammer/

EDIT: After listening to the song, my impression is that this is Asphyx going the "Hail of Bullets" route.  It's "brutal" and catchy, but it's essentially pop music; compared to previous Asphyx output, which told epic stories with a simple, bludgeoning language like The Iliad translated for middle-schoolers, this is a disappointment.

6
Metal / Negative Plane- Stained Glass Revelations
« on: February 21, 2011, 02:51:30 AM »
Hooray for the first massive disappointment of 2011!

Not content with the Mercyful Fate worship that was "Et En Saecula Saeculorum", they decided to mix a prog/psychedelic rock influence into it on this album.  Too bad it doesn't work- the album totally loses focus for it, and despite a few cool riff ideas, it just goes in one ear, out the other, with every moment being undistinguished aural wallpaper.

Bleh.

8
Metal / Sacramentum live footage
« on: December 11, 2010, 12:13:43 AM »

9
Metal / How to talk about art
« on: June 15, 2010, 01:40:43 AM »
As anyone who is reading this knows, the Dark Legions Archive sets itself apart by being one of the very few websites that offers interpretive criticism (criticism of the meaning of a work) as well as aesthetic criticism of heavy metal albums.  However, it seems that many recent posts are confusing the concept of interpretive criticism with subjective emotional reactions to art.  The latter is not an interesting topic of discussion, and posts that pretend like it is are making this forum look stupid.  As such, an extremely basic guide to artistic criticism is required.

There are three main parts to artistic criticism.  These are aesthetic criticism, interpretive criticism, and evaluative criticism.  It is important to note that these are sequential- that is, that we determine the meaning based on the aesthetics, and we determine the quality based on aesthetics and meaning.  

Now that these three parts have been introduced, it is time to define them more precisely, starting with the ones that most people have no difficulties with- aesthetic criticism and evaluative criticism.  Aesthetic criticism is criticism of the physical aspect of a work.  In the case of music, the aesthetic elements are melody, rhythm, harmony, structure, dynamics, tempo, and timbre.  Evaluative criticism seeks to answer the question "is it good?"  It follows from both the interpretive criticism (are these ideas interesting or important?) and the aesthetic criticism (is it executed well?).

Interpretive criticism is the part that many people, whether posting on internet forums or sitting in introductory art lectures at a college, have difficulties with.  Interpretive criticism deals with the question "what ideas are expressed by this piece?  What does it mean?"  It follows from the aesthetics.  Just as if you were writing about a piece of literature and ascribed to it a theme in no way expressed in the original text, if you ascribe a meaning to piece of art without being able to point to the aesthetic elements that communicate this meaning, then you are not engaging in interpretive criticism, but rather are engaging merely with your own subjective emotions.  

A brief example of interpretive criticism done correctly:  "The Gate of Nanna by Beherit starts with two simple riffs with melody limited to a jump to demarcate the end of the phrase, and a rhythm that is little more than a repetitive pulse.  At about half-way through the song, it changes to a third, slower, theme, also limited to only three chords, but in a higher register, and with a consonant minor-key melody that runs throughout the riff, as opposed to a simple note change at the boundary of the riff.  For the first time in the song, the pulse beats are dropped, with beats 1, 3, and 4 having prominence over beat 2.  As the song ends, it reverts to a gentle droning riff in the lower registers, with whispered vocals and swirling synths, playing oscillations more than notes, lending a presence more significant for sound than for musicality.  

The beginning of the song is clearly ritualistic, with the even beat and repetition of the basic riffs, combined with the intentional monotony of said riffs acting to hypnotize the listener into a meditative state,  aided by the choice of the minor third and major seventh for the notes that demarcate the end of a measure- the former to keep a somber atmosphere, and the latter to keep the song from falling into a simple minor key and giving the listener an obvious emotional reference.  The effect is further enhanced by the timbre choice of the vocals, alternating between whispering and a mechanical chant.  After some repetitions of the two ritualistic riffs- the faster one indicating an intensifying of the ritual- this part of the song fades out into the more melodic middle section.  This section, by staying strictly within minor key, but by avoiding the sixth note and descending to the seventh instead of ascending to it, is able to give the listener a more human emotional reference- the trance now broken, the listener is confronted with a triumph, still utterly somber- this feeling is enhanced by the move to the upper registers, where the guitar's tone is more clear.  The vocals take a dramatic shift from the understated to a bestial roar of "Ave Satan!  Ave Lucifer!", making the song's implication more obvious- the ritual has succeeded, and now the forces of the occult are palpable, looming over mankind, glorified by their disciples.  Finally, as the song fades out, it returns to the ritualism, but this time given an unsettling tone, from the solely-descending riff, swirling tones of the synth, and a voice whispering "sleep... sleep, my friend...".  The de-emphasis of the guitar, being the most rigid piece of instrumentation, acts to cut the listener away from the physical, as though a portal to the beyond has been opened, and the listener has been swept inside."

While it's obvious that not every post will go to the length of the above, more due to the casual nature of internet forums rather than the depth of analysis of the above (it's the minimum that would be expected in any college freshman art class), it should make it clear what most posts around here are missing- namely, discussion about the meaning of the work itself, as can be backed up by the physical form of the work.

Here's an example of what one is more likely to see around here: "Being 'artistic' means listening to music and associating colors with sequences or production like a trained painter. Certain strong colors produces stirrings or tinglings in the heart, and the imagination is taken away on an aesthetic voyage.

With Filosofem it was the faded greens of Norways countryside, In the Nightside Eclipse was dense white woods, with sharp blue moonlight cutting in, nighttime aureoles - a jaded coldness turning your heart into stone. Battles in the North.. a completely northern landscape, pure white, colder than glaciers."

Notice how no connection to the outward form of the pieces in question is made; rather, all we see here is what one listener sees in his own mind as he listens to these.  The fact that in each case he's simply describing the album cover, combined with his unsubstantiated assertion that "being artistic" (whatever that means) involves associating colors with an sounds shows that he's simply regurgitating his own uninteresting subjective emotions (oh, but they are interesting!  look at me! I'm unique!), like any well trained hipster.

There are no more excuses for poor posts like MachinalHeidegger's.  It would be appreciated if those who do not want to learn to post correctly find somewhere else to share their neurotic ego drama.

10
Metal / KERASPHORUS breaks up
« on: June 04, 2010, 01:16:55 PM »
Quote
After much thought and due to B.Wolaniuk’s departure and J. Read’s unavailability for live performances, I have decided to dissolve Kerasphorus.

Kerasphorus is some of the greatest music I’ve ever created. After B.Wolaniuk announced his defection and J. Read informed me that he was unable to play live, I vowed to soldier on. I recruited Zolrak (ex Morbosidad, Unholier, Nodens) to play guitar, and Paul Collier (ex Angelcorpse) on drums for the live shows that were booked.

However, playing live with different members dilutes the concept of Kerasphorus. I am therefore canceling all live performances with Kerasphorus.

On May 15th Kerasphorus recorded two songs that will be released on EP later this year.
I have already started working on a new project and hope to have material released by 2011.

Thank you for the support you’ve given Kerasphorus.
Helmkamp
03 June 2010
Damnit, I was hoping to see them in August.

11
Metal / Aosoth- Ashes of Angels
« on: March 07, 2010, 05:09:40 PM »
It may have taken 10 years, but MkM has finally appeared on another album worthy of his voice.

The first two songs, as well as a few deeper into the album, are like forgotten Antaeus songs from the CYFAWS era seen through the lens of “Battles in the North”-era Immortal.  The rest is like the more ambitious and experimental stuff from “Blood Libels”, but without the passages where it sounds like the band couldn’t figure out a way to continue the song, so they simply decided to bash on a random four-chord riff.

12
Metal / Prosanctus Inferi posts new song
« on: February 18, 2010, 02:25:54 AM »
"Flayed Ecclesian Sophistry"

http://www.myspace.com/prosanctusinferi

13
Metal / New song on the Imprecation myspace
« on: January 19, 2010, 04:33:28 AM »
"Baptized in Devil's Blood", from the upcoming "Sigil of Lucifer":
http://www.myspace.com/imprecationusa

14
Metal / Mainstream recognizes what sets metal apart
« on: April 17, 2009, 09:58:52 PM »
http://wtbfocus.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/why-i-love-metal-music/

Despite the namedropping of terrible bands, the general point is correct (before he falls into the "it's hard to play, so it's good!!" trap)- rock music is about simply creating a song to a template, whereas (good) metal has an idea and sets the form around it. Progressive rock such as King Crimson or the better Pink Floyd works (although Animals is much better than The Wall) attempted this, but wound up lapsing back into the rock tropes they wanted to get away from; same with proto-metal such as Led Zeppelin or Black Sabbath.

It's funny how people with no exposure to the underground can understand this better than modern-day "kvlt" black-metallers.

15
Quote
Pope Benedict said on Saturday there were worrying signs of a new type of eugenics based on perfection and physical beauty.

"Certainly, the eugenistic and racial ideologies that in the past humiliated man and provoked immense suffering are not being proposed again, but a new mentality is creeping in that tends to justify a different consideration of life and personal dignity," the pope said in a speech to the Pontifical Academy for Life.

The Vatican considers pre-implantation diagnosis of embryos to avoid genetic defects or select for qualities like gender morally unacceptable. It is also against genetic enhancement for purposes other than medical treatment.

Pope warns on new eugenics based on beauty, Reuters (2/21/09)

Summary- "We want more ineffective people!  The weak are worth more in the eyes of gOD!"

[1] 2 3