Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
16
Chasm / Re: Teeth, race, and intelligence.
« on: May 16, 2013, 04:49:12 PM »Maybe I don't understand what is meant by a "protruding jaw," but it would seem to me that whites have larger jaws and chins than blacks. This kinda stuff is absolutely not my forte, but I would say over the past year or so I got kind of interested in skulls, less from any sort of scientific sense and more in an "aesthetic" sense. So all my observations are very very amateurish. I really don't read any sort of literature about this, but I just observe what I see in day to day life. Take a look at pro athletes, the white guys always have bigger chins/jaws than their black counterparts. Maybe the biggest difference I notice is not so much the jaw, but the chin. Blacks rarely have much of a chin. Take a look at that NFL player that fought in the Post 9/11 War, Pat Tillman. Have you ever seen anybody but a white guy with a chin and jaw like that?
I think what you notice on white people is angular chins and jaws.
But basically what i'm getting at is that black people never have receded lower jaws in profile, even if their jaw is less angular. and they have protruding teeth and maxillas, partly responsiblle for the ape-like appearance.
Jay Z is an example
you can tell that their teeth protrude, it shows in how the skin just barely stretches over them.
The reason this likely disappeared with whites and asians is that huge jaws and teeth compromises other things.
Australian Aborigines of course have the biggest maxillas, teeth and jaws out of everybody, and the lowest IQ
17
Chasm / Teeth, race, and intelligence.
« on: May 16, 2013, 01:52:15 PM »
Philippe Rushton noted blacks having more protruding teeth and jaws
Teeth are further back for whites, and even more so for Asians.
Usually the larger the teeth, the smaller the cranium.
in the rare times when you see a white person with huge teeth and a huge cranium, they have a primitive appearance, probable neanderthal admixture.
anybody thought about this before? I hardly imagine the jaws and teeth are merely a superficial aspect of race.
not to mention jaws are related to the airway, which might explain why blacks never developed receding jaws, they needed more oxygen to maintain physical strength and speed. having protruding teeth leaves a lot of room for the tongue such that the airway is never compromised.
Teeth are further back for whites, and even more so for Asians.
Usually the larger the teeth, the smaller the cranium.
in the rare times when you see a white person with huge teeth and a huge cranium, they have a primitive appearance, probable neanderthal admixture.
anybody thought about this before? I hardly imagine the jaws and teeth are merely a superficial aspect of race.
not to mention jaws are related to the airway, which might explain why blacks never developed receding jaws, they needed more oxygen to maintain physical strength and speed. having protruding teeth leaves a lot of room for the tongue such that the airway is never compromised.
18
Chasm / Re: Edenism/new anthropology
« on: December 24, 2012, 05:27:47 AM »He seems to offer some good advice and ideas for introverts, but lets get real here: this is the guy who claims he can determine with 99% accuracy your level of “thal” ancestry just by looking at a photo of your face.I'm a little skeptical myself because this guy's whole M.O. seems to be that he is an introvert with aspie tendencies. He started writing about seduction tips for introverts and occasionally conservative political commentary. He seems to have taken on this new thal fascination. It could be a way to make himself feel special and intelligent and blame his lack of social skills on those damn extrovert cro-mags.
This based on emotional reasoning rather than anything cool headed and logical.
For instance, I only have a basic understanding of evolutionary biology but can still tell you this is pulled straight from his ass:
“As a result, they evolved into r-strategists, favoring promiscuity and low-investment parenting as a reproductive strategy….
sexual dimorphism was relatively nonexistent because fathers rarely invested in their offspring, forcing women to pick up the slack; higher-order thinking was almost entirely absent.”
In reality K selected species exhibit minimal sexual dimorphism (eg: swans) whereas R selected species usually have dramatic dimorphism (baboons).
To me Koanic Soul's system is basically Scientology for introverts.
However the news about neanderthal interbreeding seems to have come and gone even though this has some pretty serious implications.
20
Chasm / Re: Mind control is real
« on: December 23, 2012, 07:09:34 PM »
I don't doubt that 9/11 is suspicious. There are a ton of people with phD's in physics, architecture, engineering who are CERTAIN it couldn't have happened like the official story. Everybody forgot about them.
The video of the father is surely suspicious but for now it's not enough.
The video of the father is surely suspicious but for now it's not enough.
21
Chasm / Re: Edenism/new anthropology
« on: December 22, 2012, 07:57:18 PM »I don't know how much there is truth about the ''new anthropology'' but I have never believe that all humans come from the same african ancestors.
My intuition is telling me that if some humans really came from apes, others may came from different species of animals, like boars for exemple or at least several types of apes. It's maybe why there is more difference of behavior between a human from an other one than between two dogs.
I've doubted "out of africa" myself. the PC folk use it, even though it still proves the IQ differences
interbreeding plays a role as well. many of the species/breeds that developed were capable of having offspring with others.
The range of monkey-human specimens were probabably all able to procreate with the species on either side of them.
the idea of whites having more in common with asians and blacks being a completely different group is only noted in a few anthropology texts.
If this thal hypothesis is correct, I wonder how the masses would react to it. humans wiped them out with only small traces left. funny how no equal rights existed when these hominids co-existed. We don't weep over an extinct species today even though at the time it must have been devastating. If anything the neanderthals probably applied equality becuase of the way they evolved in the north.
23
Chasm / Edenism/new anthropology
« on: December 22, 2012, 05:03:30 AM »
To start, before people push this aside as something batshit insane, this is what we know almost for certain
-Neanderthals existed and evolved separately. They lived in small groups and survived brutal climates. They were intelligent.
-Neanderthals and early humans had some interbreeding. Up to 4% neanderthal dna in some non-africans.
this is one guy's take on the anthropological implications. Interesting read whether you agree or not.
beyond white supremacy.. he claims that the majority of whites without thal dna are disposable. Also notes the neanderthal traits appearing in asians.
http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/reading-faces-the-eyes-are-the-windows-to-the-soul/
-Neanderthals existed and evolved separately. They lived in small groups and survived brutal climates. They were intelligent.
-Neanderthals and early humans had some interbreeding. Up to 4% neanderthal dna in some non-africans.
this is one guy's take on the anthropological implications. Interesting read whether you agree or not.
beyond white supremacy.. he claims that the majority of whites without thal dna are disposable. Also notes the neanderthal traits appearing in asians.
http://www.koanicsoul.com/blog/reading-faces-the-eyes-are-the-windows-to-the-soul/
24
Chasm / Re: Connecticut Shooting
« on: December 21, 2012, 03:10:52 AM »
mediterraneansun made an excellent post.
There is nothing more brutal than a feminized high IQ kid in a socially atomized world.
http://us.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-shooting-adam-lanza-barber/index.html?c=&page=1
read this and actually picture it. Picture a boy whose bitter single mom doesn't even let him speak. 20 years of that shit. I'm suprised he didn't snap sooner.
Why would he care about a bunch of kids? People care in tight communitites with actual values.
Do we care about the people we are crammed into subway cars with? We push past them.
There is nothing more brutal than a feminized high IQ kid in a socially atomized world.
http://us.cnn.com/2012/12/18/us/connecticut-shooting-adam-lanza-barber/index.html?c=&page=1
read this and actually picture it. Picture a boy whose bitter single mom doesn't even let him speak. 20 years of that shit. I'm suprised he didn't snap sooner.
Why would he care about a bunch of kids? People care in tight communitites with actual values.
Do we care about the people we are crammed into subway cars with? We push past them.
25
Chasm / Re: Procrasturbation
« on: December 21, 2012, 02:57:00 AM »
a more interesting way to look at procrastination is to ask "what is worth doing?"
26
Chasm / Re: Connecticut Shooting
« on: December 17, 2012, 06:45:12 PM »If the people here talk so much against the weak, wanting to exterminate them, how come when a person that can not cope with life not only kills self but children, gets attempts at understanding?the difference is these shooters would most likely prosper in the kind of society people here envision. Most are intelligent but they go mad because the world is mad as well. In a materialist society, what difference would the age of your victims make? everyone is walking into the same sad abyss. In a society with no tight-knit communities, the children he shot were objects he didn't give a fuck about because there is no framework for that kind of thing.
27
Chasm / Re: Connecticut Shooting
« on: December 17, 2012, 04:55:10 AM »naw I think you misunderstood. laws of nature say that men do not get as much sympathy as women(fertile) and children(due to youth). They are expendable.No one gives a shit about a man's feelings until he picks up a gun.
now this is mostly due to the nature of humans HOWEVER men being raised on equality get the idea that the world gives a shit and then lash out if/when they learn the truth.
I don’t see human nature as instinctively self-centred. The traditional societies, being smaller and more tightly-knit at least make it possible (if not necessary) to love thy neighbour.
Equality is more of a political prop which in reality means nothing more than ‘individual pursuit of material wants’. People only lash out in a desperate attempt to reconcile this toxic, omnipresent world-of-shit-type realization with their true nature; the desire to love and be loved.
In the world of equality men might get the wrong idea that someone will care. Mens rights activists still hold on to the hope that we will get complete equality In a traditional society they would be raised to be stronger and more self sufficient, not needing to be emotionally dependent. The debate goes to gun control in these incidents because nobody really cares if he was an aspie, a psychopath, on meds, or why he became crazy. They just wish he killed himself before doing this, and they wish the same for all the other depressed omega males out there.
28
Chasm / Re: Connecticut Shooting
« on: December 16, 2012, 06:47:25 AM »
No one gives a shit about a man's feelings until he picks up a gun.
now this is mostly due to the nature of humans HOWEVER men being raised on equality get the idea that the world gives a shit and then lash out if/when they learn the truth.
in the old days a man would take out his frustration through skills and progress and comradeship with males who are all in the same disposable boat, and would also have a nurturing wife. Now he has little of all of these things and lives in an illusory world.
now this is mostly due to the nature of humans HOWEVER men being raised on equality get the idea that the world gives a shit and then lash out if/when they learn the truth.
in the old days a man would take out his frustration through skills and progress and comradeship with males who are all in the same disposable boat, and would also have a nurturing wife. Now he has little of all of these things and lives in an illusory world.
29
Chasm / Grown up baby
« on: December 08, 2012, 01:22:36 AM »
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgQfAylIf_A
I'm just trying to hold back disgust and understand. We must have some insight into the psyches of degenerates.
The woman who takes care of him is a washed up cougar who uses him to supplement her natural nurturing desires. she is just like the women who pretend their pets are kids. All mentally ill hags because they didn't reproduce.
Obviously the guy's life is an irreparable disaster. The world frightens him and he wants to go back to the comforts of childhood. He has zero odds of succeeding as a male. I wonder if he was always obese.
I'm just trying to hold back disgust and understand. We must have some insight into the psyches of degenerates.
The woman who takes care of him is a washed up cougar who uses him to supplement her natural nurturing desires. she is just like the women who pretend their pets are kids. All mentally ill hags because they didn't reproduce.
Obviously the guy's life is an irreparable disaster. The world frightens him and he wants to go back to the comforts of childhood. He has zero odds of succeeding as a male. I wonder if he was always obese.