Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length

World apocalypse 666 -I-

World apocalypse 666 -I-
January 03, 2012, 02:33:18 PM
Quote
Here are 14 signs that the world as we know it is unraveling right now. We are living through the end of one era and the birth of a new one.

#2 - The silence of the bees
#5 - The rise of the medical police state
#6 - The increasing frequency of food shortages and crop failures
#8 - The continued GMO contamination of our planet
#11 - The plummeting intelligence of the masses
#12 - The complete and utter fabrication of the mainstream news
#13 - The ongoing pharmaceutical pollution of our world
#14 - The radioactive contamination of the global food supply

http://www.naturalnews.com/032258_economic_collapse_2012.html

Environmentalism is tainted by leftism, and so much of the stuff in this article is alarmist hysteria. However, the above are worth thinking about.

I don't think there's any apocalypse, only a "convergence of catastrophes" as Guillaume Faye puts it. However, these are not apocalyptic catastrophes but a long slow slide into third-world status.

True, I have some heretical views: The BRICs are paper tigers. Wikileaks means nothing. Iraq and Afghanistan were not disasters. China and Russia will form a bulk warm bodies bloc that will need to be bombed into  submission.

But I think these are secondary to the big point: civilization is declining, and it is worst in first world nations, because we are (a) smart enough to be neurotic and (b) have the most to lose.

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
January 03, 2012, 03:14:54 PM
It's worst in the first world nations because you have let go of almost everything and exist mostly on the basis of inertia. You do have a lot of stuff though!

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
January 04, 2012, 04:46:05 AM
Quote
One leg of Mr. Gribbin's argument rests on the theorized life expectancy of advanced civilizations, which he claims is much more fleeting, on a cosmic timescale, than we care to admit. Our species has inhabited this planet for about one hundred-thousandth the age of the galaxy, and it was merely a century ago that we began to transmit radio waves. If technological civilizations did arise before ours, they might have succumbed to war or environmental degradation well before our primate ancestors stood upright.

The rosy alternative—a long-surviving society—seems even less plausible. With millions of years of technological advancement, why haven't they migrated throughout the galaxy by now? Or why haven't we picked up the least shred of their radio-wave chatter? Of course, Mr. Gribbin dismisses such questions: These purported civilizations never existed.

Quote
We occupy, according to Mr. Gribbin, a unique position in the cosmic scheme of things. Having crowned humanity as the apex of galactic intelligence, Mr. Gribbin warns that there is no second chance: If we destroy ourselves, we will have done a grave injustice to the universe, removing perhaps the only means it has to ponder itself.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204552304577116570107579152.html

He must be another Metal Hall lurker.

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
April 28, 2012, 11:54:00 AM
Unthinkable as it may be, humanity, every last person, could someday be wiped from the face of the Earth. We have learned to worry about asteroids and supervolcanoes, but the more-likely scenario, according to Nick Bostrom, a professor of philosophy at Oxford, is that we humans will destroy ourselves.

Bostrom, who directs Oxford's Future of Humanity Institute, has argued over the course of several papers that human extinction risks are poorly understood and, worse still, severely underestimated by society. Some of these existential risks are fairly well known, especially the natural ones. But others are obscure or even exotic. Most worrying to Bostrom is the subset of existential risks that arise from human technology, a subset that he expects to grow in number and potency over the next century.

Despite his concerns about the risks posed to humans by technological progress, Bostrom is no luddite. In fact, he is a longtime advocate of transhumanism---the effort to improve the human condition, and even human nature itself, through technological means. In the long run he sees technology as a bridge, a bridge we humans must cross with great care, in order to reach new and better modes of being. In his work, Bostrom uses the tools of philosophy and mathematics, in particular probability theory, to try and determine how we as a species might achieve this safe passage.

http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/03/were-underestimating-the-risk-of-human-extinction/253821/

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
May 06, 2012, 06:38:39 PM
A system, which for the first time in all of history, is globally interconnected.  A super system so large, so fast, and so complex that it can’t be understood or managed.

Yet, despite this, we give an incredibly small and increasingly concentrated group of people the authority to centrally manage our future.  This group uses the following ‘knowledge’ to manage our future:

  • Soviet type administration and regulation for governance.
  • Wall Street equations for finance and corporate governance.
  • “Harvard” academic knowledge for economics and other social endeavors.

The knowledge these central planners use to run the world isn’t the same as the simple ancestral, experienced-based, and ecological rules we learned the hard way over thousands of years.  You know, the rules that we use every day to make good decisions.

In contrast, the knowledge used by our global central planners is newly minted and highly contingent social science.  For example, think of all of the narrow assumptions that underlie modern economic analysis.

Further, the rules of these central planners are using are mind numbingly complex and lack a meaningful track record.   Ask yourself:  Do these theories produce results consistently over decades let alone centuries?  Do they really reflect reality?  If you aren’t willing to bet your life on either answer, that’s hardly a body of knowledge we should be betting the survival of the species on.

http://www.resilientcommunities.com/weekend-edition-the-failure-of-soviet-harvard-and-wall-street-knowledge/

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
May 06, 2012, 09:08:43 PM
Quote
APOCALYPSE, THE WORLD IS COMING TO AN END!!!!!

*yawn*

You've been saying this for how many years now? Death metal was supposed to be "the canary in the mine" since, what, 1989?

Re: World apocalypse 666 -I-
May 07, 2012, 02:32:12 PM
It's been fairly accurate. It's not like a meteor was predicted to hit the planet, decline is slow and gradual and imperceptible if one isn't aware.