You don't know history very well then for instance after the Crusades when muslims spread further into Europe, crushing Constantinople with it's "yellow people" and still ruling that area to this day. They also took all of southern Europe at one time or another throughout the Dark/Middle ages, including Spain, Italy and Greece. Those countries were made mostly of white people until this. Now people from those countries are rather dark and seem more Middles Eastern than white.
I have been wondering about this myself, but I never put the Muslim invasion into context.
I was looking for my argument as to why the modern Italians are not the same as the ancient Romans, and I have found my answer. Thank you.
The point of philosophy is that we can look at abstractions, not instances of those designs.
In the case of religions, philosophies and cultures, the important thing is to find out what is real.
Christianity can have the real, and so can Islam, but there are other factors at play here.
First, Islam is a religion, but it is indigenous to a certain region whose population has changed since ancient times, and whose fortunes have declined.
A problem is nether of these religions were built for our civilization, and since our civilization has now largely shaped the world, we are in an ideological crisis.
Second, Christianity is a religion in the hands of a declining culture where peasants are equal to kings.
We need to focus on the important things we can learn from this:
(a) Mass revolt destroys any religion, culture or philosophy
(b) Idiots will infest any religion, culture, or philosophy
(c) Ethnic-cultural differences trump religious labels
(d) Each region needs an indigenous culture, religion and philosophy (hopefully one and the same, at a philosophical level)
Can we all agree on these?
Largely, this declining culture is rejecting Christianity, and religion all together. I believe that the issue isn't so much the religion, but the entire culture. Maybe this culture is the future, as the result of technology and the new globalist world. Or maybe this is the beginning of the end of this civilization.
(a) A problem here is that many religions, cultures, and philosophies are created by mass revolt. Christianity was a mass revolt against Jewish materialism, western culture (as it is now since the Renaissance) is the result of a revolt against mysticism, and the belief in humanism, and philosophy is a revolt against society.
I agree with B, C and D.
I detest Nazis and racism, but I think that we too often consider honest ethno-nationalism to be racism. That's not racism. Racism to me is a desire to keep other races around so they can serve you in a lower social position.
Pan-nationalism creates no slaves. It does, however, remove us all from being slaves to the nightmare of having no clear culture for each region.
The Nazis were nationalists, unless you are referring to skinhead neo-nazis, then I agree.
racism is the preference of one race over another. Unless you are a strict multiculturalist, you are a so called "racist".
To me, as long as the individual is a decent person, I do not care what race that person is. As long as they do not have the slave mentality, I do not care. The problem is that most have this mentality, and this is vocal in all races. However, in a social darwinists view, certain cultures are prone to this mentality. Whites "won" because of our minds, we invented better machines, and due to this, we have conquered the world. We "evolved" first.
I believe it is normal not to care for other cultures, because they are not your own. However we now have the problem that there are no good cultures, as ours has decayed.