You're not seeing the macro of what culture is. Most Americans grew up in white homes, in white neighborhoods, with macro cultural institutions in place in the communities. This is why they get jobs. Graduate college. etc. Not knowing we declared independence from England doesn't take away the true nature of the people(though our people's nature is being rapidly diluted). This inherent nature is fundamentally Northern European, whether it is realized or not.
Culture is an arbitrary set of habits. I've lived in mostly mexican or asian neighborhoods from years 8 - 17 i think. The difference is pretty minimal. Sure there were more robberies and gangs in the mexican areas but the majority of the people were perfectly functional and tried to steer clear of the assholes. Also i don't see there being all that many cultural institutions in local communities. Theres the church and a handful of holidays where people BBQ in communal areas.
African slaves were not connected at all to their people, and their culture was specifically designed and shaped to keep them reliant and quiet.
So what? The non-slaves that were left behind and still attached to their culture aren't doing any better.
You have confirmation bias. You want to hate them. You find proof in the pudding then. Like the IQ tests and such. I've used those same tests before to justify negative feelings.
You're imagining things just to feel sorry for them. I'm mostly neutral towards blacks but find that a lot of them seem kinda retarded. The IQ tests aren't justifying anything, they're just one of many indicators. If blacks had the best civilization on the planet and were constantly producing geniuses yet somehow were scoring low on IQ tests everyone would clearly agree the test isn't working right.
But it doesn't make sense to say an entire continent of people would be fundamentally "fuck ups". They would have selected out of existence.
No, it doesn't work that way.
Instead, we must analyze why they are fuck ups. The cultural traditions of African are the least compatible with the rest of the planet. We need ask why. This could possibly be because of neuromorphology being different than other groups, which are much closer related to each other. It isn't hard to see why Africans look "less evolved" slightly than the rest of old world humanity, which is by in large approximately equal cognitively and is just in different states of cultural development. This could be related to the fact they're closer to earlier modern human forms due to not having to face the selective pressures the peoples that left Africa long ago faced.
Seems like a reasonable possibility.
Or it could be related to the fact there was far far less cultural interchange between Africa and the rest of the world than the rest of global North had. Africa was beyond the coast isolated until colonialism which completely fucked up large amounts of their native culture rapidly, and infused with with very alien forms.
You mean how south america was isolated? All these arguments are the same for them yet somehow they manage to be in decent shape. Japan has also been isolated for a large part of its development. China had long periods of isolation. Visigoth tribesmen were conquered by Muslims for 800 years and within a 100 years of reconquering their territory they launched their campaign in the Americas.
I wonder how quickly the savage Germanic and Celtic barbarians of 1500 years ago that would later become Northern Europeans would have gotten their shit together if they were suddenly invaded by Chinese who imposed completely alien systems upon them.
And being conquered by Romans is different how?
Only once the modern period came into existence did Germanics move past the basic primitive state not unlike Africans were mostly in until colonialism. Little written language, no amazing civilizations, nothing like that existed until relatively recently. This is why we know almost nothing about our classical Germanic Paganism. No giant temples to Thor can be found and only shreds of runic history remain.
I've always felt northern Europe was culturally inferior to the south. Even when germanic tribes managed to conquer roman areas they just ended up becoming romanized shortly after. Yet northern europe mostly developed along the same lines as the rest of europe after being conquered and christianized around 900ad or so. Even before that their trade economy was in pretty good shape and they had founded a few civilizations in the area of Russia. I think its a huge stretch to compare them to sub Saharan Africans who have basicly yet to accomplish anything at all past the stage of hunter gatherer (assuming Nubia didn't extend into what is now considered SSA).
I'm over scientic racism that begins and ends with IQ test results.
Yes it is clearly so biased that it's inventors aren't even the ones scoring the highest on it.
Western exploitation of Africans is a large part of the cultural guilt that is being used to destroy us. Turn away from it. Whites must learn to value the sanctity of all human traditions, without sacrificing our own. This is a balance the Japanese have learned. And we have not. We northern Europeans are a barbaric lot really.
Japan is a pretty terrible example. Japanese are convinced that they are the chosen people and are culturally superior. They just don't go around throwing it in peoples faces. Arabs seem to be pretty arrogant in this regard too. The only dysfunctional ones in this aspect are Europeans.
At the end of the day you can take any example of something bad that has happened to blacks and find even worse examples elsewhere in history. Somehow everyone else manages to adapt.