In Search of a New Model For the Music Industry

When underground music came about, it addressed a simple problem: rising costs had forced market concentration in the music industry. This produced six big companies that owned all the content, paid all the people who promoted and played it on radio, and therefore shaped the listening audience.

This happened once music became highly legalistic and streamlined in its business model, involving a few big stars going on tour, selling a ton of merch, and being featured in the usual tabloids and television shows in order to drive attention.

In contrast, during its infancy the industry required far less. A label consisted of someone who got together enough money to record and press records, fronting that money to the artists, then spending more to mail out records to radio and journalists in order to build an audience.

After the 1960s made music into part of the great culture war, however, the industry shifted into high gear. Wildcat upstarts became less common because it cost a lot to be in business, and big industry figured out how to manage expectations from customers so that they bought only more of the same.

Underground labels skipped all of the drama, often operating without contracts, and simply pressed and sold small runs of different bands entirely outside of mainstream radio, media, and commentary. They created their own little culture-within-a-culture which steadfastly hated the herd and its soda-pop music.

As part of this, they rejected the slick production that could cost millions and instead opted for the garage lo-fi sound that punks had adopted in the previous decade, getting closer to the days of the original mono records put down in one take on portable tape machines.

All went well, until they succeeded. Suddenly these small labels had guys calling up who wanted to buy thousands of CDs or vinyls in a genre where a thousand was normally the total pressing for an album. Contracts and lawyers were required. Promotion had to be hired.

People like me warned that assimilation would happen, much as punk, blues, country, rock, folk, and jazz had been streamlined into pop. Metal would become a flavor of rock; with the rise of metalcore and post-metal, this seems to be the reality.

Just after that, in the early 2000s, the (practical) ability to share music via the internet hit. This did away with the need to mail-order CDs and vinyls; people could click and download, legally or otherwise. This crushed the market model based around physical sales.

Years later, the music industry still seeks a workable model where content can be sold, musicians paid, and a promotional apparatus exist:

Basically all the art we know in history books, the business model for that art was not unit sales. It was patronage. It was a person who made great stuff. And then an institution, a religious institution, a government, a wealthy individual, would pay that person to go make more of that. You name it, whether it’s the Sistine Chapel or the David or whatever, that art was funded through that business model. Those artists made money through that business model.

Then the 1900s rolled around — the late 1800s, to right around the turn of the century. Essentially what happened was humans figured out how to record what would otherwise be ephemeral art onto physical objects. We figured out how to record light onto celluloid. We figured out how to record sound onto wax cylinders. That replaced, eventually, the business model of patronage, with unit sales being the primary revenue mechanism for artists.

Starting in the 1900s, billions of dollars of infrastructure basically evolves — whether it’s jewel case manufacturers or trucking companies or brick-and-mortar retail — all this infrastructure evolved to basically help artists put their art on a physical object and then ship that physical object around the world to consumers who would purchase it and then enjoy the art. That became the primary business model for art and artists — whether they’re creating video or audio, music, talk, whatever it is — for a hundred years.

At which point, the internet hit and scarcity disappears. Unit sales disappear as a business model. And suddenly everyone’s running around with their hair on fire, trying to figure out how to get creators to make money again.

People do not like to admit it, but labels offer a significant advantage in promotion. If your audience is broad, instead of having to impress wise and intelligent aristocrats, you need to sature that audience with promotional materials.

Labels, by maintaining a constant network of journalists, radio, stores, and venues, can open doors for musicians. However, like most things pre-internet, this gives way to be able to look these things up and arrange connections, if the artists have the time and mental organization to do so.

In addition, like book publishers, labels form a hierarchy of quality signals, such that being on a certain label (say, Osmose) opens doors for bands. Labels can filter through the mediocre in order to hire expertise in production, promotion, ad copy, and visuals.

Streaming services offer a model, but probably not the model that the industry needs, since this turns musicians into relentless promoters who, like local metal bands, must accumulate a vast audience of true fans through constant stunting and headlines.

Perhaps the death metal and black metal fans out there are onto something when they keep buying products from small labels who often refuse to use streaming services or be on YouTube. Anything which is public will be compromised by the herd.

Tags: ,

6 thoughts on “In Search of a New Model For the Music Industry”

  1. RDS says:

    From what label owners tell me there are two types of bands: bands that get lots of streams and bands that sell lots of physical copies.

    A band can have 500 thousand streams but in reality that translates into less than 100 sold physical copies. Therefore it really doesn’t matter to labels what you can stream – they will always invest in bands that can sell physical copies.

    So yes, streaming is cancer and the industry is far better off without it

    1. Its all about margins says:

      Stream farms are the current state of things and the foreseeable future.

  2. Ken says:

    I did a search for the Polish black/death band Pandemonium here, and didn’t find an entry. Their album Devilri is pretty classic imho.

  3. Oprah Winfrey says:

    There’s also the crowd funding route. It probably wouldn’t work from the get go from an unknown group and/or one intent on touring extensively to pay bills, but you’d think established outfits like Summoning, Graveland or even Demilich could easily cover the expenses of an expertly produced album or EP that way.

    1. Syphilis says:

      You think they will start making subpar video games and high-tech sextoys?

  4. Glibert says:

    New Era: The New World Mass Media: Spotify, Deezer, Tinder

Comments are closed.

Classic reviews: