Some Favorite Books For Pushing the Edge

And so the great fascination with the online world begins its fade-out: once the domain of nerds, then the place for hip people to content farm, now the internet is seen as the burnout zone it really is.

The good news about this is that people are buying stuff again: books, records, tapes, discs, even magazines. We are looking for tangible works of human effort in a world of influencer slop and clanker churn.

If you wanted to have a good read this weekend, here are a few good options:

Naked Lunch
by William S. Burroughs

If you want the original transition from thinking like a human to thinking outside of human self-soothing fictions, Naked Lunch takes you into the underworld beneath the peer pressure induced socially-acceptable Crowdism-validated world of consumer marketing, religious simplification, groupthink and socializing, flag-waving patriotism, bureaucratic laws removed from cause/effect reasoning, “wet streets make rain” correlation-causation logic, Hegelian deductive cascades, macho posturing, scapegoating and talisman-seeking, hermeneutic language, narcissistic entitlement, convenience-oriented categorical thinking, desk-shifting of work to the responsible, and generally, all of the gross little thought processes that appear innocent but manifest many steps down the line as a human tendency to destroy each other for the sake of our own emotional self-regulation. One of the best books ever, should be read by conservatives and liberals alike, but will not make sense to libertarians or fundies.

Reverence: Renewing a Forgotten Virtue
by Paul Woodruff

At the root of all philosophy is a desire to reconnect to the world so that we can actually live the life we have instead of staying layers removed from it with abstraction, emotion, socializing, money, power, and status. Reverence posits a simple vision of the transcendental: when we discover what causes us awe in life, we can connect that to the whole of existence, and find a place for ourselves in a larger order where we are no longer enslaved to hubris and can instead finally appreciate being alive. You can approach this book from any philosophy, background, or reading level and easily fall into its arguments, which deepen like a midnight ritual as the book goes on. So simply profound and well-stated that you might only be able to read it once, this book goes beyond the normal stuff on the philosophy shelf which focuses on human abstractions, and looks instead to connect our abstract brains with organic reality.

Liber Null and Psychonaut
by Peter Carroll

Hermetic/pagan thought is based upon the notion of choice, which requires understanding reality to know the consequences of each option and therefore, to actually exercise will, instead of doing what most people do which is to react with optics, emotions, manipulations, and moralism without caring about the consequence. If you want a guide to ends-over-means consequentialism as a philosophy of life, this book provides the introductory material in a direct and convenient way with bite-sized chunks that nevertheless clearly address the core concepts of esotericism.

NAOS
by Anton Long

When you decide to leave behind dualism, universalism, individualism, and other neurotic behaviors and instead to embrace the hermetic/pagan outlook, an intermediate guide in the form of NAOS will supplement and clarify your thinking. Written in the ancient style of cryptic ring composition with subtle kenning, this book of aphorisms knitted into a narrative expands the world in order to reveal the paucity of the “objective” values that most people rely on but which are in fact merely symbols of the world, the map and not the territory. To experience the real thing, one must first become open to what it is, what one is becoming, and what the options for choice are and how those form an inertia toward more choices like that one.

Bobos in Paradise: The New Upper Class and How They Got There
by David Brooks

After the 1960s, political ideology and bourgeois materialism joined into one philosophy that suited the newcomers to America more than its heritage residents, so it became the new dogma among the over-educated and well-heeled takeover people. Taking a nod from Tom Wolfe and Mike Davis, this book shows us the outlandish excesses of gourmet lifestyles in order to reveal the philosophy behind them, which is a politically-correct form of signaling designed to exclude everyone but the new takeover group. Although all of that is well and good, the book is hilarious and shows us human pretense in greater depths than ever revealed before, a real masterpiece of documentary satire.

Inhuman
by Jean-Francoise Lyotard

Philosophy ran out of room after Nietzsche because he articulated all of its relevant parts in depth, so philosophy split into the theory of mind nonsense which is basically psychology for neurotics, and the dissident wing embraced by this militant philosopher from the lonely failed land of regicides. His theory is that we are drowning of too much humanity because we are afraid to think thoughts outside the mental ghetto of human emotions, socializing, and optics because those are linked to bourgeois self-promotion and “making that sale.” To become better humans, we must become inhuman, and through this achieve clarity of thinking, he argues, creating a space in the house Nietzsche built where it might be cold but nothing is out of place.

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature
by Steven Pinker

The author of this book was deplatformed and driven out of much of academia for suggesting that equality is a farce and humans are in fact inherently quite different from each other because Darwinism creates “inequality” and hierarchy, the two things most feared by a Crowd. Without being political or taking a side, he criticizes the two wings of egalitarianism, fundamentalist Abrahamism and liberal humanism, as philosophies and points out in depth how the science shows that our abilities are different, it is genetic, and recognizing this is our only path to quality both as individuals and in terms of what we produce as a civilization, starting with a functional social order. Pinker targets the ultimate taboo of our time with a workmanlike inspection of all of the knowledge that shows how “equality” is a symbol that seduces minds, not a working plan for human survival.

Republic
by Plato

This might be the most heretical book you ever read because it points out the actual motivations of humans underneath the symbols they trade with each other to create mutual good feelings. It starts out by questioning how to live a good life, then explores what defines good and its opposite, and finally shows us how the pursuit of avoiding controversy and coming up with pleasant symbols makes civilization gradually go insane and decay from a shared transcendent goal into extreme bourgeois individualism which seeks to destroy anything other than the individual. Written plainly with an extreme focus on logical fact, Republic shatters all of the illusions you have unknowningly been nurturing about your species and its constantly dying civilizations.

Race Differences in Intelligence
by Richard Lynn

While social class differences in intelligence arising from genetics may be a more interesting subject, this book touches on the greatest taboo of our time, namely why some groups are wealthy and organized yet other groups are impoverished and chaotic. Although we officially believe in Darwinism as a “scientific” society, actual Darwinism, including recognition of the genetic basis for all traits, is taboo because it conflicts with the reigning ideologies of egalitarianism and dualism, in which the human individual is seen as equal in basic ability despite absolutely zero evidence supporting that notion. Extending this to race yanks support for this mental dichotomy and forces a collision with the basic assumption of human social groups, namely that everyone or at least most people are intelligent and oriented toward good results.

The Space Trilogy
by C.S. Lewis

Probably the most profoundly disturbing science fiction in history, and joining Bradbury in a wider critique of technology as a substitute for culture, this series of books looks at “progress” as a form of neurotic human self-centeredness gradually taking over all of reality and leaving ruins behind because the functional parts of the world challenge our egos. Featuring characters you would like to know in real life, these stories uncover the dark psychology of those who devote themselves to individualism — echoing Moby-Dick in many ways — and how their need to be more important than reality drives them steadily toward ever more destructive and self-defeating acts.

The Antichrist
by Friedrich Nietzsche

No book collection would be complete without this book that rejects Christianity and in doing so, eschews the idea of a universal, absolute, and objective form of truth, values, and judgment in which all people participate like a shared space or social group. Instead, it shows us how alone we are, like Satan falling from the heavens, because hierarchy is inherent and most do not seek wisdom but its opposite, leading them into worship of symbols that blinds them to the choices possible in life, making them contorted and collapsed on themselves like a dying civilization. While its blasphemous side gets immediately noticed, the sublime nature of this book comes out in its tendency to liberate us from liberation so that we can discover again the world without the shadow-symbol of God obscuring its function.

Happy reading!

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

57 thoughts on “Some Favorite Books For Pushing the Edge”

  1. 666 says:

    Still plugging away at White Noise. A part of me thinks it might only be really interesting if you lived the through the 80’s. But I like Babs enough to see what happens.

    1. I am not certain it is about the 1980s. It has a heavy 1950s vibe, to be honest.

      1. 666 says:

        I’m pretty convinced it’s set in the 80’s but that being said, it’s made ambiguous enough to be happening anytime during the postwar period up to Clinton – I’m just not sure yet that it has anything to say about consumerism that Repo Man didn’t say more concisely and clearly, and it suffers from all the characters acting like men in spite of the authors’ efforts to create women and children. The narrator and Murray are men, so that’s okay, and DeLillo hit on something with Babs who must be based on at least one real woman. But this quality reminds me of reading Philip K Dick, who usually still managed to say something interesting, even if it took the first 3/4 of a book to set up the context for that something. It’s just one of those books I’m reading very slowly and sporadically because I may not be enthralled but I’m still curious.

        1. Postmodern lit is a lot like sci-fi. It explores possibilities more than certainties, but points on the convergence of possibilities — like the relativity of all to the whole — as a loophole in our understanding. This generally means floating downward into an underworld where the new rules reveal themselves and the old rules are unmasked as manipulations. It is disorienting. Like most literature, it does take some patience however.

          1. 666 says:

            Well put. The book makes me think of sci-fi as well, kind of like how David Foster Wallace does without really being sci-fi. I’m also reading The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind by Julian Jaynes and I must say it pairs well with White Noises’ namesake theme: that of language becoming that which obscures rather than elucidates.

            1. DFW was a sad case, hanging himself at a California college. He was basically following in the footsteps of Pynchon and Umberto Eco, and he ran himself into nutso land. Julian Jaynes? Very interesting; we should talk about Plato and the cause-effect relationship between the metaphysical (in parallel) and the physical.

              1. 666 says:

                Jaynes asserts that consciousness is borne out of the development of language as increasingly complex metaphors for events in the tangible, physical world. This seems pretty straightforward to someone who has read Plato. One of the most important points he makes is that conscious experience as we know it did not develop until about the time the Iliad was conceived, and even then only in little sparks; nothing like we have now. I haven’t gotten to the meat of the text yet but the chapters on the Greeks and Plato are coming soon. If you’re interested in a quick run-down of the ideas presented in this book, a couple of the youtube channel essentialsalts’ recent videos concerning unconscious greeks and bicameral empires are about just that, and are what got me interested in reading the book, the introductory fraction of which I have so far read has proved to be even more interesting than I thought it would be. I already suspected it was time to brush up on Plato while reading this book but now I am certain.

                1. One rarely goes wrong with Plato. Consciousness it seems to me is natural to the universe, but in order to maintain that, the universe itself must be unconscious. Lots of myths address that one. As far as the metaphysical, I think Plato gets it more right than Abrahamism, and Buddhism is sort of like a degenerated view of the root philosophy Plato espoused. So basically, everyone needs to read Plato. The translation linked above is pretty good but I am feeling my way through the newer ones; most are pretty mediocre but some have potential.

                  1. 666 says:

                    The thing about consciousness is that it only seems to exist as something in reference to itself, and if it arises as a result of sufficient complexity of communication then this begs the question of what is being communicated and why. Now maybe something akin to language exists for things that we would not normally consider conscious, and it’s just our self-interested mammalian brains pumping the brakes on perceiving what would be at least virtually infinite layers of communication between all phenomena. That’s certainly the intuitive experience I’ve had deep in focus or peaking on mushrooms. Anyway Plato’s forms have obvious relevance here. The metaphysics of Abrahamism and particuarly Christianity I have too much to say about in the context of this conversation but I will say that whatever value exists in most trajectories , it is insufficient to explain and propel forward my own values. Buddhism merely aims to diminish suffering. A sensible enough position in certain situations but not something to build a cosmology on if you ask me.

                    1. Buddhism and Christianity feel like palliative care for dying civilizations.

                      I wonder about consciousness. It requires some degree of self-awareness but may simply be an idea topography, where enough is known for the self to be oriented in a complex environment, and therefore for things to be compared and choices made. This seems to be the basis of consciousness: perceiving, tokenizing, choosing, modifying.

                    2. 666 says:

                      Volition, in a word.

                    3. Choice and the impetus to make it.

                2. 666 says:

                  Forgot to mention my copy of the Republic is the Joe Sachs translation and it’s my favorite of all that I’ve encountered.

  2. pope Benedict - from Hell says:

    seems you left out Pure War by Paul Virilio…..

  3. Martin Tyrsegg says:

    How about ‘Gnostic Fragmwnts’ by Nimrod de Rosario.

  4. Savannah Sellers Margaret Brennan Deidre Fitzpatrick Tamera berg bottomless hard fucked by black Hawaiian Portuguese shemale cops with dicks explicit hard exploding cum in their mouths pussies and asshoes ha! says:

    Hahaha

    Sydney Sweeney is an American actress of mixed European ancestry, including English, Irish, German, Norwegian, and French-Canadian roots.

    Hahaha would u still hit that shit now Brett huh?

    Look

    Can u make her an exception huh!

    Hahaha

    And name ten actress you guys would make love to you get a dollar hahaha

    No racism just say hell nice for a nagger or beanery ass ya know!

    Any Italian pussy jokes anyone?

    And Italian death metal bands huh? Do you like them huh?

    Any bitches you’re interested in that I liked or like?

    And any black chicks in death metal or black metal anywhere huh?

    Answer ok

    And if jlo was sucking your cock would you still deport her ass? Huh Brett huh?

    Me it’s miss Tahiti 2025 Tonga 2025 Jennifer arroyo Christine scabbia Sara Sherman Brianna Torres and Katie yamaghuchi and you?

    1. Sydney Sweeney is an American actress of mixed European ancestry, including English, Irish, German, Norwegian, and French-Canadian roots.

      Oh no. No no no.

      1. Smeggin Fox says:

        I’m not Irish but I have to know: what’s with the Irish hate?

        1. It is not Irish hate per se but a recognition that ethnic diversity is fatal like racial diversity. Bringing the Irish to the USA created a large labor pool in the northeast that drove politics Leftward and sponsored our Civil War, in addition to creating permanent corruption through Tammany Hall and other political machines. If any group does not identify as being the founders, then they work against that founding group and divide society against itself. People who are of the founding group are “equal” to the founders, but everyone else wants “equality” as a way of taking over. The same criticism applies to other SEMI (Southern, Eastern, Mediterranean, and Irish euros) being present in Western Europe. These groups have foreign racial admixture and therefore identify as hostile to the unmixed Western Europeans.

          1. Crionics says:

            Seems to my untrained eye the American distaste for the Irish stems from their Catholic roots and the indigent and famished state in which the initial boatloads arrived. Not sure how much of that was an inheritance from young America’s English ancestry. As for the racial disparagement, I don’t know man, they don’t look all that different from other white folk the world over. Redder and paler on average, but the physiognomy and stature isn’t all that different.

            1. It depends on the observer. I can point out obvious differences, and not just the jug ears. English lore holds that they are mixed with Moroccan/Iberian darker people, and the studies of the past chronicle this. It is why so many of them have Semitic features. The same is true by the way of the dirty hairy greasy wops and much of Eastern Europe. Catholicism is also bad because it is the primitive version of Christianity.

          2. Smeggin Fox says:

            I am curious if you have read Grady McWhiney’s “Cracker Culture” and, if so, your opinion?

            1. I have not, I am sad to say. Worthy?

              1. Smeggin Fox says:

                Worthy? I’m not a historian or Civil War buff, so I’m not sure. McWhiney was a Southern historian (Southern by origin as well as his area of focus) who suggests in “Cracker Culture” that the culture of the antebellum South, although mixed, was predominantly shaped by Celtic and closely related (e.g. Irish, Scots-Irish, Welsh) peoples and their customs. Customs which valued speaking over writing, honor (often through violence), idleness, and conviviality and emotionality/boisterousness as evidenced in a social premium placed on verbal sparring/repartee ability (the etymological root of “cracker,” i.e. wise-cracker), honor killings (e.g. “you looked at my wife…”), and a more boisterous, revival-type church preaching and congregations compared to the North (which McWhiney characterizes as Anglo-Saxon). All traits that some (Sowell?) argue were observed by Southern blacks and persist in the black community today (rap battles, consequences for being “dissed”, etc.) McWhiney frames the Civil War as the continuation of a perennial battle between Anglo-Saxons and Celts. Is it accurate? Is it lambasted by the community of Civil War historians? Don’t know. Is it interesting and compelling? Yes.

                1. Have you read I’ll Take My Stand?

                  1. Smeggin Fox says:

                    I have not but based on the blurb, I’ve put it on the list

  5. Trooth Fairy says:

    I know a bloke who jacks off to Finnegan’s Wake so often that we started calling Finnegan’s Wank. He used to say it’s the oy way to really enJoyce a good book. Eventually the community took him outside the walls and shot him like a dog, not least for his dad jokes, which is what they did with Modernism as a whole in the years immediately following the Climate Wars.

  6. Patrick Pearse says:

    You prefer later “versions” of Christianity?

    1. Saner, like Calvinism.

      1. Patrick Pearse says:

        Big TULIP fan are ya?

        1. Dubbledutch says:

          Brett isn’t averse to a dutch bulb, that’s for sure.

  7. Metal Mystic says:

    I never understood the appeal of O9A material. I find it strange anyone could read something like NAOS and want to participate in these bizarre rituals or channel these so called “Dark Gods” that even by the author’s admission can be entities of malice and repulsiveness. Why would anyone think they’d benefit or find truth in communion with such beings? O9A mythology also doesn’t appear meaningfully extended from hermeticism or any occult tradition, and seems to be the author’s attempt to brand his own strange spin on otherwise established occult practices/concepts. Perhaps I’d understand if I participated in what the book is suggesting, but I don’t see how your description of NAOS actually relates to the content within. You seem to be projecting your own world view on to it.

    Admittedly the Star Game does seem intriguing in a way, but more so strange and excessively convoluted. Mr. Stevens have you built and played your own version? Did it unlock meaningful secrets beyond it’s own mechanisms for you?

    1. My primary esoteric practice is Platonism. On other things, it is best to be silent, unfortunately. I hope that “culling” becomes an American cultural trope.

    2. 666 says:

      I use tarot and runes, but in an intuitive way. I can see the appeal of more rigorous ritual, and for my part creating art and simply coming to understand previously unknown ideas constitute this. We are all throwing stuff at the wall to see what sticks; the reason why it does comes later if at all.

      1. The most rigorous ritual: walking alone through lawless forests while meditating and envisioning the infinite, eternal, and divine.

        1. Flying Kites says:

          This is the Oh-nine-Aye Rite of Internal Adept, accomplished 36 hours beforehand with the determination to succeed.

          1. It is a lifestyle. It bases itself on a simple theory: that it is better to think things through before doing them, which requires lots of free time to walk, meditate, smoke a pipe, nail up a Nazarene, etc.

      2. Patrick Pearse says:

        Tarot…lmao…….Personally, I’m spiritual but not religious….

        1. 666 says:

          Tarot involves imagery that corresponds to human experiences and motivations, Pat, it’s got nothing to do with religion or even “spirituality” necessarily. It’s essentially the same thing as pondering the characters, the landscape, the movement, of a Baroque painting. Go tell Cormac McCarthy that tarot makes you lmao all over yourself. Goddamnit you’re so fucking dumb. How about you make yourself useful for once and gargle my balls before you kys

          1. Patrick Pearse says:

            Ok, I told him….he didn’t respond tho……Tarot is garbage…..

          2. Patrick Pearse says:

            Baroque paintings are stupid too……

            1. 666 says:

              I’m waiting sugartits

              1. Patrick Pearse says:

                Is sugartits one of the major or minor arcana? Thanks for clarifying…

                1. 666 says:

                  It’s a reference to your girlish anti-intellectualism and vacuousness, Pat.

                  1. Cormac Mcarthy says:

                    He’s right, Pat. Timw to grow up and be an intellectual who plays with Tarot cards.

                    1. 666 says:

                      It’s not about supposed to be doing this or that, it’s that you create this space where nothing can be represented except for the obvious and the ironic. It’s a bore.

          3. Was it Gravity’s Rainbow or V that used Tarot mathematics for its conclusion? Damn good trivia question, should use it on game shows.

    3. Askingforafriend says:

      What I don’t get is why actual talents such as Nodveidt and Larouchi kill themselves while assholes like Erik Danielsson still hang around like dingleberries.

  8. kok krankin' kritiic says:

    Is “pushing the edge” another way to say “edging”? I doubt any of these works could produce other than the most fleeting and reluctant tumsecence. Maybe Burroughs, if I cranked it hard enough. Or is that the point? Easy cleaning is one reason I use Kindle now. Anyways, here’s an excerpt from a novel that never lets me down, Bunker 13 by Aniruddha Bahal. Definitely check it out if this snippet stirs your loins:

    ‘What’s that?’ you ask. You see a designer pussy. Hair razored and ordered in the shape of a swastika. The Aryan denominator… As your hands roam her back, her breasts, and trace the swastika on her mound you start feeling like an ancient Aryan warlord yourself….

    1. 666 says:

      Bunker 13 qualifies as edgelording

  9. Satan says:

    R.I.P. Cronos, godfather of black metal.

    1. We hear about how Chuck Schuldiner was the godfather of death metal and Cronos was the godfather of black metal from the same people who use Wikipedia and A People’s History of the United States.

  10. Kostas Simos says:

    Greek speaker here. what’s your opinion on Junkie? Read it one year ago, I’d say THIS was inhuman writing. No? Still afraid Naked Lunch is gonna be mumbo jumbo, that’s why I haven’t read it thus far.

    1. Naked Lunch is the re-mix of Junky and earlier works. Much improved!

  11. Crionics says:

    what do you think of Robert Pirsig?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z