Pilgrim’s progress

death_metal_murders
I thoroughly enjoyed William Pilgrim’s “The postmodern Gorguts” for its list of metal attributes. For many years, writers have attempted to categorize metal and most commonly have ended up with a list of surface traits such as loud distortion, screaming, fast drums and occult lyrics. Pilgrim’s list looks at the compositional tendencies of metal that are consistent from proto-metal through black metal, and bears another analysis as separated from the topic of Gorguts, which is only ancillary to the question of metal itself. Thus follows his list:

The original idea, as metal goes, is as much structural as it is ideological. There are a few qualities that are common to how all true metal should be constructed.

  1. Melodic contiguity: All forms of metal, even the harshest strains, are inherently and recognizably melodic in nature. This means that the individual phrases that make up a metal song obey cohesiveness, as tenuous as it may seem at times. Though individual phrases are often in different keys, it is paramount that they share the same musical space.
  2. Movement towards a discernible and logical conclusion: This is the will to motion previously outlined in these pages. Metal’s roots in traditional story-telling with a beginning, a middle, and an end, are not to be forgotten in eager exchange of a need to experiment. There has to be a gradual ascent, or a plummet as it were, towards an ultimate punctuation. Though various approaches can be used towards achieving this, playing for time in false hope of creating mood, while using ideas containing little intrinsic worth, is anathema to metal.
  3. Rhythm section to assume a strong yet only supporting role: Metal is a predominantly lead-melody oriented form of music. Bass and drums are integral to creating a fuller sound but should only be viewed as swells on an ocean on top of which riffs and songs float. Often, swells rise and raise their load with them, but this hierarchy in relations is crucial and is to be preserved.
  4. Atmosphere created not through textural embellishments and quirks but as a by product of composition: All claim to that shady word “atmosphere” should come from immanent qualities in the way the music is written. Metal does not need overt experimentation with harmonics or tone if these asides are incapable of holding together on isolated inspection.
  5. Awareness that all forms of groove play to a far baser inclination in the mind’s analytical apparatus. They can be enjoyed on a case-by-case basis but are not something to be eagerly sought out or encouraged in metal.
  6. A keen comprehension of repetition as device: Repetition is to be used as steadily outward-growing eddies that take a song to a different place, yes, but one that maintains a tangible relation to the place left behind. Individual components within the repeating phrase should have some emotional consonance and not serve as mere padding.
  7. Conscious realization that metal is in fact composed music and not free jazz.

To insert a minor quibble, I disagree that metal is “ideological.” If anything, it is anti-ideological, being based in a harsh realism rather than a set of platitudes about Utopia, which seems to be the basis of all ideology to me. Metal is intensely artistic, and artists tend to have strong opinions, and from a distance this may look like ideology or even count as an ideology of sorts, but not in the modern sense, which means a series of appealing thoughts designed to mobilize mass approval and thus, political power. If metal has an ideology, it is an artistic outlook of a very general nature and not directed toward specific manipulations resulting in immediate real-world changes; rather, it hopes to condition the outlook of those who participate in it with the most general philosophies toward life itself.

By the same token, metal seems to me to less succumb to lists than a spirit which reflects this philosophy. Technique is a means to that end, and that we now live in an age when power chords and heavy distortion create a sense of foreboding of doom and insurgent power determines that these become the primal technique that unites all the others, like a drawstring bag around otherwise random artistic implements. Metal focuses on the union of harsh realism and intense mythology, because metal is fundamentally a worship of power and these are the greatest powers in human life. Only death is real, and yet people follow religions and hail the ancient stories. If metal has a goal, it is making realism into a kind of poetry, and it uses a series of techniques to that end that form its most visible component, but they are not in and of themselves the goal of the genre.

Let me then add my components of metal:

  1. Nihilism. The music must use the simplest and most gutter-level techniques possible when they are powerful.
  2. Through-composed. From Black Sabbath onward, metal bands have been stacking riffs to explode melodies.
  3. Guitar is lead rhythm. Songs are advanced by guitars, with drums/bass/vocals in supporting role.
  4. Phrasal riffs. Riffs use fills as main body of riff in order to create shapes which interact across key, time and form.
  5. Immanent meaning. No riff or part is the meaning, but the progression of the whole “reveals” meaning.

Any sensible observer will note that the above are simply less specific and more distilled versions of Pilgrim’s seven points above. His focus is more on specificity; mine more on spirit. And yet the two overlap and somehow hash out the same realistic truths about heavy metal. Metal is fundamentally anti-social music, in that it rejects “what everyone thinks” and experiences a downfall instead as it reverts to a nihilistic, literal, organic, materialistic and naturalistic level of reality. It rejects human society and all of its ideas, which are essentially pretense, in favor of harsh realism and mythological aims like beauty, truth, eternal love and eternal hate. I would argue that metal is conservative except for its constant forward focus, not toward “progress” but adventure.

As a result, I would argue that metal is impervious to both ideology and trends, since it consists solely of spirit and the aforementioned method. In fact, it takes no particular point of view, since its method must appear in all that it does. Thus metal is “spirit,” and will adapt to any developments in music, but since there have been none, it howevers around the intersection of the best humanity has produced so far — classical, modernist and baroque — using the techniques available to four guys, guitars, microphone and drums. This then leads us to a more vital question when examining metal, which is whether a band adopts this outlook and method through the question of what an adaptation of that method to the particular style of the band would look like. With post-metal, nu-metal, tech-death, metalcore and other modern metal, we find that missing and its opposite principle, the looping narrative of rock, instead.

8 thoughts on “Pilgrim’s progress”

  1. Biggest complaint here would be that most metal is actually NOT through-composed. The strict definition of through-composition requires that no large-scale repetition happens. Even most classical music is NOT through-composed either.

    The subgenres before death and black metal almost always resorted to song structures, which are most definitely not through-composed. Then most death metal bands do not use through composition but many do indulge in a mixed modality called “riff salad”.

  2. blackmetalkid says:

    So black metal is the only metal genre to truly use through composition and thus reigns supreme over all others lesser forms. Darkness eternal! :%

    1. He never even implied that. He said “from proto-metal through black metal”. That’s just chronological ordering.

      1. blackmetalkid says:

        I know that. I was answering based on your commentary. You didn’t mention black metal so I assumed it’s the only form of metal that fully uses through composition. Eternal darkness!

        1. That’s a big assumption that is not even logically derivable from the fact that I didn’t mention black metal directly, haha!

          I do think that some of the best black metal has a strong tendency towards through-composition.

  3. blackmetalkid says:

    Also Brett’ don’t write “I think that…” during your expositions over metal and even less when it’s about black metal’s grandeur. It makes it look like an opinion and takes power from your statements.

  4. Nicholas says:

    Some very thought-provoking and inspiring articles have been posted here recently. It is evident to me from the language used in the texts themselves and from comments made by Mr. Stevens and Mr. Rosales that some articles, such as this one, are meant to serve as a launchpad for discussion. I wish to contribute to such discussions, because I see value in articulating the merits of this art form that has had great positive impacts on guiding me toward truth / reality / nature. However, I find myself speechless when I finish reading the majority of these documents (not awe-stricken, but rather empty, simply nodding or scratching my head). Perhaps I lack a sufficient understanding of the material, or perhaps I lack confidence in myself. Maybe, if I keep reading, I will think of something worthwhile to contribute to this cause. Until that time, best of luck with your noble endeavors.

    1. I had the same issue when I first started reading Brett’s stuff years ago. Then he mentioned the fact that he uses an esoteric approach, and then it dawned on me what the purpose and the nature of this is. He operates from the assumption that you cannot teach anybody, you can only signal pointers. Whoever wants to learn, will learn, will study, will think, etc.

      They’re meant to be launchpads and they assume a certain basis of knowledge or the will to go study for yourself.
      They’re not so much informative or education as they are about organizing high-level thought.

Comments are closed.