Matt Harvey Gives MetalSucks the Reach Around

Matt Harvey of deathcore band Exhumed was called up to provide a contrary viewpoint on Decibel Magazine’s website to MetalSucks’ call for a proscription of Hells Headbangers Records, circlejerking around the Blast Beat advertising network.

Presumably Ben Umanov and Matt Goldberg were looking for someone other than fat hypocrite Neil Jamesson (Krieg) to provide the counterpoint to their manifesto. Harvey is a metalcore musician of the type covered on MetalSucks, Metal Injection, and Decibel. Exhumed rehashes the aesthetics from Carcass‘s career (typically from Reek of Putrefaction to Heartwork) into bouncy rocking punk singalongs for drunken fetal alcohol syndrome sufferers mosh to. The same audience as those MetalSucks readers not blowing up their comments section. Umanov and Goldberg found a funderground punk to make a contrarian bar room argument to MetalSucks threat of “Join us or die.” like Alan Rickman in Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.

Matt Harvey immediately started virtue signaling after declaring that metal is not politically correct despite not even playing it. Barney Greenway, the current frontman of Napalm Death, is Jesus Christ according to Matt Harvey despite being a Communist. Communism is the deadliest political ideology of all time, giving rise to delusional mass murdering dictators like Vladimir Lenin, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot. According to Matt Harvey, Greenway is a better human being despite his personality defects than those Harvey brands as Nazis like Varg Vikernes and Rob Darken. Napalm Death has always been politicized; Burzum and Graveland are apolitical. Neither Vikernes nor Darken are Nazis; Vikernes is an environmental traditionalist who acknowledges human ethnic and racial specialization for varied habitats that humanity inhabits while Darken is Polish nationalist. Both acknowledge their ancestral gods, which according to Harvey, makes them intellectuall inferior to Greenway, who kowtows before busts of Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Foucault.

Matt Harvey is not a metal artist, he is just another poseur metalcore musician jamming himself into the Blast Beat Network’s daisy chain for page views and corporate advertising dollars. A daisy chain is a group of men sodomizing each other in a circle. That is what the Blast Beat Network does: provide contrary viewpoints to poseur idiocy on the websites within the advertising network to keep readers clicking back and forth, irrumating their faces with constant preposterous illogical arguments. Harvey is just another metalcore scenester wanting to get the last word and virtue signal to his punk buddies that Exhumed is ideologically better than the actual metal bands he mentions.

In the United States of America, the Constitution provides for freedom of speech, assembly, and the press. Hate speech is constitutionally protected, which was recently affirmed by an unanimous United States Supreme Court verdict. Hells Headbangers can stock any title they want to stock. Nobody wants or needs to hear the opinions on metal of poseurs who do not even play or like metal music such as Ben Umanov, Matt Goldberg, and Matt Harvey. Fuck off and die.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

26 thoughts on “Matt Harvey Gives MetalSucks the Reach Around”

  1. Yuzerneigm says:

    Testify!!!

  2. phrasal phrasey phrase phrasey phrase phrase says:

    yeah. varg is honestly more of a leftist than a rightist.

    Varg Vikernes: every race has its own unique strengths and attributes. nationalism is for losers, the alt-right are losers. it’s time to destroy technology and civilization and live in caves as plastic sword wielding roving tribes. hail odin.

    leftist: he’s a naatzi! he’s a fucking naaaatziii! white male!!!!

    I miss when leftists were politically literate. they were always misguided, but there was a time when they weren’t fucking retards. they used to understand that not everything right of Marx is automatically far north-east in the political spectrum.

    barney has sexy mantits

    1. matters says:

      Barney’s vegan and probably likes soy. I still like Napalm Death however.

    2. Dispirited says:

      There’s still an intellectual left, and contrary to what many people think, it’s not ‘politically correct,’ it includes people who think, i.e. philosophers, people whose life’s work is thinking. A lot of them are not Marxists, but they are libertarian materialists, it means that they oppose Communism. Those thinkers are being outnumbered by intruders who know fuck all, who don’t think, who don’t read cause they’re lazy dipshits, and who are very insecure about their identity. The same issue is happening in Heavy Metal music, in other forms of art, in cinema which pretends to be “artsy” (Art-house), all the forms of art which used to be interesting to the ear, eyes and mind are being replaced by lazy pseud-intellectuals who hold pseudo-scientific ideas that make them feel good about their stupid and useless lives. This category of pseudo-leftists pretend to be atheists, but are secretly enamoured with new age bullshit and are publicly very forgiving of Islam and any religious doctrine that is not Judeo-Christian.

      Recommended ‘lefty’ thinkers:

      Michel Onfray,
      Gilles Deleuze (he sometimes agrees with Foucault on some topics, but nonetheless a great Nietzschean thinker worth checking out),
      Albert Camus (he opposed Stalinism and was in perpetual disagreement with Sartre and Beauvoir on a number of issues),

      Those three and others work(ed) also in fields other than ‘politics’ such as literarture.

      I long for a renewed, atheistic, realistic movement which will make both “left” and “right” in politics irrelevant terms; if that day ever comes, we will see people, like Nietzsche has said, as either courageous in the face of reality or as cowards.

    3. Dispirited says:

      There’s still an intellectual left, and contrary to what many people think, it’s not ‘politically correct,’ it includes people who think, i.e. philosophers, people whose life’s work is thinking. A lot of them are not Marxists, but they are libertarian materialists, it means that they oppose Communism. Those thinkers are being outnumbered by intruders who know fuck all, who don’t think, who don’t read cause they’re lazy dipshits, and who are very insecure about their identity. The same issue is happening in Heavy Metal music, in other forms of art, in cinema which pretends to be “artsy” (Art-house), all the forms of art which used to be interesting to the ear, eyes and mind are being replaced by lazy pseud-intellectuals who hold pseudo-scientific ideas that make them feel good about their stupid and useless lives. This category of pseudo-leftists pretend to be atheists, but are secretly enamoured with new age bullshit and are publicly very forgiving of Islam and any religious doctrine that is not Judeo-Christian.

      Recommended ‘lefty’ thinkers:

      Michel Onfray,
      Gilles Deleuze (he sometimes agrees with Foucault on some topics, but nonetheless a great Nietzschean thinker worth checking out),
      Albert Camus (he opposed Stalinism and was in perpetual disagreement with Sartre and Beauvoir on a number of issues),

      Those three and others work(ed) also in fields other than ‘politics’ such as literarture.

      I long for a renewed, atheistic, realistic movement which will make both “left” and “right” in politics irrelevant terms; if that day ever comes, we will see people, like Nietzsche has said, as either courageous in the face of reality or as cowards.

  3. neutronhammer says:

    Ah the vitriol. I like how Metalcore has been rightly turned into an invective here. Metalcore is an abomination that only liberal modernity can produce. Groove metal should meet a similar fate too

    1. And “stoner doom”… like stoners need a fucking lifestyle accessory.

  4. Blast Beated says:

    Decibel is no longer part of the Blast Beat Network.

  5. Ghost of Cho says:

    When the men of the colony grew tired and the simple pleasures of life no longer mattered so much, and they could no longer do those things anyway, could no longer fish, garden, work hard or protect the women, they fell headfirst into decline, they began dying out, it would take millennia even but an irreversible process had been initiated, the women like ants would carry the poison around the colony eventually finishing everything off, by then being taken over in large numbers by foreign populations, inter- and down-breeding would occur with those populations until the original one no longer existed or resembled itself in any way, it would be a long, dark millennia

    1. Dispirited says:

      That’s how Neanderthals died out. It was a different species.
      If you’re so insecure that you think you’ll be “replaced,” then have a lot of babies, encourage your friends to do the same, multiply, be a bigger number. And most of all uphold the rule of law as the sole law of the land and you wouldn’t have to worry about whatever population you’re afraid of. But if you’re insecure that it’s your genes that are going to disappear, or that the next generation has fewer snow white kids, that means you’re a racist. And if you think any of that matters then you’re forgetting that everything will die eventually and none of this matters, that there are no gods, and that the only thing that matters is what you do now in your life.

      1. asdfghjkl says:

        >If you’re so insecure that you think you’ll be “replaced,” then have a lot of babies, encourage your friends to do the same,

        Dishonest. Mass immigration replacing a race in their own land is a wide-scale systemic issue, not one man’s contest against every swarthy immigrant in America to to pump out the most babies. you don’t set someone’s house on fire and say “geez, if you have such a problem with fire, just throw some water on it! Put up or shut up, don’t be such a crybaby!”

        >But if you’re insecure that it’s your genes that are going to disappear, or that the next generation has fewer snow white kids, that means you’re a racist.

        That “racism” used to be called “common sense” and “self-preservation instinct.” White people are not unique in wanting their own genes to survive, they’re merely unique in being in the position where that’s actually something to worry about. Do you think the Chinese, Indians or Africans would happily accept plummeting below the 50% population mark in their own land? It’s surprising to me that somebody who reads this site would have to have natural in-group preference explained to them. Or that race is more than just “skin color” (but for the sake of brevity let’s not get into that).

        > And if you think any of that matters then you’re forgetting that everything will die eventually and none of this matters

        this is your brain on postmodernism.

        1. Used uP says:

          A very small % of whites care. But they do this on the level of thoughts, not instinct, like all the other shitty races of the world. Whites don’t instinctually reproduce. They’re also the only race to active work against their own interests

        2. Rainer Weikusat says:

          Dishonest. Mass immigration replacing a race in their own land is a wide-scale systemic issue, not one man’s contest against every swarthy immigrant in America to to pump out the most babies. you don’t set someone’s house on fire and say “geez, if you have such a problem with fire, just throw some water on it! Put up or shut up, don’t be such a crybaby!”

          Let’s take this for granted as discussion point. How did most of the population of what is nowadays called the USA end up being white if that’s such a fragile and endangered species? I mean, without »affirmtative action« of some sort, which is what you seem to be asking for?

          I think I’ve been kicked in the head a couple of times yesterday after concluding that I should pay back the drink thrown onto me for “antisocial un-gayness” in kind (“foreign accent” and “improper haircut” probably contributed to this). This happened because I was trying to locate my glasses on the floor. They’re of paramount importance to me, hence I couldn’t care for the other guy at this moment
          even if he had kicked me to death in the meantime, which was certainly a very real possibility. That’s presumably a problem you don’t have and you presumably also don’t have “small, male and alone” issue which means you end up everybody’s favorite punching ball unless you fight back as good as you can, be the results puny and “perish in the attempt” always on the table. So, why are you so defensive about this?

          Early history of American colonization was pretty gruesome: The people who tried to do this where a gross minority in a foreign and hostile country and repeatedly, whole colonies ended up being wiped out by a combination of storms, warfare waged upon the people and famine. Yet, the settlers persisted in the end. And they probably didn’t even mean to end up supplanting the natives and building a powerful nation, all they sought for was a place where they could till some land and be safe from the king’s hangmen seeking out members of ‘dubious’ religious convictions (suggested reading: A Narrative of the Captivity and Restoration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson).

          No amount of strange people settling in the vicinity can take anything away from you that’s part of the fabric of your existence, say, a hereditary culture. If this culture has grown sick, it needs to recover until its healthy again, otherwise, it is going to die out. Conserving it in a museum because it was so cute while it was still alive is not a solution.

          1. Rainer Weikusat says:

            I should immediately add the usual replies to save people the trouble. I’ll try an example instead:

            Nobody is going to tell me that I’m responsible for stuff other people who happened to have the same skin colour did centuries before my birth, eg, ‘slavery’, without getting laughed at. As the matter stands, even most white people who happened to live in one of the confederate states during that time weren’t anyhow “responsible” for it: They might have been “free” but this doesn’t mean they had an influence on anything. “The slave owners were all white” is something completely different from the assumed “the whites were all slave owners” — the majority of them (most likely) actually wasn’t. Whoever doesn’t understand this or refuses to understand it is either an idiot or intellectually dishonest and deserves to be regarded as such.

        3. Dispirited says:

          @asdfghjkl

          1-You’re clearly worried about a demographic problem. If whites are afraid to be outnumbered, then reproducing more is a good thing (and I don’t mean a personal effort on your part, just that if you want more of ‘you’ then make them). Jews or more specifically Hebrews were being exterminated in WWII, but they did not die out, even if their number is low in comparison to other ethnicities in the world; one thing they do a lot is make lots of babies…

          2-Racism is not common sense, it’s stupid. You should not worry about whether the next generation of Americans or whatever other country is in the same proportion of races, but that the positive aspects of your culture not be thwarted by regressive behaviour. It doesn’t matter what the skin colour is or where the parents of the immigrants have come from. Stupidity is found the same proportion in all races and all cultures. That’s the enemy, not how many blondes vs blacks there are.

          3-‘Postmodernism’ is an ignorant assessment of my reasoning.

          1. Dispirited says:

            @asdfghjkl
            “It’s surprising to me that somebody who reads this site would have to have natural in-group preference explained to them.”

            Dude, I read this website cause I like it. Although I don’t always agree with the political vitriol on race, I agree with a lot of what it stands for, and I’m here for the music reviews first.

            Now to your ‘in-group preference’ thing…that’s retarded. I don’t have an in-group preference. I have preferences when it comes to women, physical traits that I like. However, I did not learn those from my ‘group’ because I’m not a sheep, it’s aesthetic taste to who I like to fuck and probably some genetic preference on who I want to reproduce with which is subconscious. None of this is an in-group thing. I’m not part of a herd, although I will defend some of the herd’s shared values when they do not clash with mine, like the rule of law.

      2. Hagel says:

        Biodiversity is a part of nature’s splendour, and humanity is a part of nature.

    2. Exfoliation says:

      I thought y’all niggas talkin bout ants

      1. Jajaja says:

        we talkin bout 12 inches of long dark millennia comin stray at u

        1. Turtle trumpets says:

          You guys are a riot

  6. Dispirited says:

    For the admins: my comment in response to phrasal phrasey phrase phrasey phrase phrase keeps showing up under someone else’s comment; please delete the duplicate where suitable.

    1. Rectal Administr8er says:

      Will put that at the middle of my to-do list.

  7. Rainer Weikusat says:

    This “Matt Harvey” article is too many words and too many assertions about the author’s “good opinion”.

    The simple fact here is that artistic expression is neither the same as political propaganda, especially “political propaganda in the USA” if it involves people who aren’t even living there, nor the same as political (or ‘terrorist’) actions: Somebody writing a poem containing the lines “Under the spell of a sadistic shaman/ I do thy bidding with blood tipped scythes” (Desekryptor) or “So, as duty calls on northern forces/ The gladiator of the mountains arise/ He locks and loads his scoped 6.5/ Dune coon dogs must pay the price” (Nordvrede) is something entirely different from somebody else driving a car into a crowd a few thousands miles away and a constructed cause-and-effect relation between the former and the latter is really just as specious as the argument behind the historic “Judas Priest made our children kill themselves” court case.

    “Freedom of artistic impression” means “people are free to express something other people thoroughly detest”. Any kind of other people, be they born-again Christians or Metalsucksers. The latter deserve no more special treatment than the former in this respect.

    1. Turtle trumpets says:

      Rainer suggesting that somebody else is using “too many words”…

  8. Trashchunk says:

    Art means you wear a beret and act emotional in front of chicks, or in the true artist sense, other dudes, while excreting squeezings of expression

  9. ben umanov's dildo dradel says:

    Fuck fuck fuck fuck I hate those metalsuck fucks

Comments are closed.